He Made $60,000 in 2 Months with This “Failed” Real Estate Deal

Summary of He Made $60,000 in 2 Months with This “Failed” Real Estate Deal

by BiggerPockets

46m•August 31, 2026

Overview of Real Estate Rookie with Caleb Smith

This episode follows Caleb Smith’s early journey into real estate investing, from discovering BiggerPockets at 16 to closing on a profitable “failed” deal that made him over $60,000 in less than two months. The conversation covers his first purchase, the lessons he learned from bad assumptions and permitting issues, how he adapted to an expensive housing market in Northern Virginia, and why he’s now focused on a live-in flip and selectively pursuing cash-flowing properties in lower-cost areas.

Caleb’s Origin Story in Real Estate

Caleb’s interest in real estate started young:

  • He discovered BiggerPockets while working at Jersey Mike’s as a teenager.
  • He was drawn to the idea of entrepreneurship, passive income, and deal-finding.
  • By the time he turned 18, he had started building capital from:
    • working jobs since age 12
    • mowing lawns
    • farm work
    • stock investing

He initially believed he had a knack for investing, but later admitted much of his early stock-market success was luck, not skill.

First Lessons: Waiting Can Be Expensive

One of Caleb’s earliest investing lessons came from passing on a property on his first day of college:

  • He toured a potential student-housing deal in Harrisonburg, Virginia.
  • The house was listed for $165,000 and he thought it was a good deal.
  • His dad advised him to pass because of likely issues like:
    • lead paint
    • asbestos
    • termite damage
    • general rehab complexity

Years later, Caleb checked what happened to the property:

  • It sold later for around $270,000
  • He believes the market appreciation was the real driver, but the experience still reinforced how costly hesitation can be

First Purchase: Buying a Rental with Almost No Money

Caleb’s first actual deal came through a family connection in Western Loudoun County, Virginia:

  • His dad learned of a seller who wanted to sell off-market
  • The seller originally wanted around $329,000
  • Caleb’s dad believed the property was worth around $450,000+
  • Caleb had only about $2,000 to his name at the time
  • Caleb’s dad loaned him the money so he could buy it

Deal structure

  • Initial contract price: $329,000
  • Caleb negotiated it to $335,000
  • He received a $6,000 seller credit
  • He used the credit for a 2-1 rate buydown
  • Original appraisal came in at $375,000
  • The house was later estimated to be worth roughly $460K–$489K

Renovation work

The home needed only modest improvements:

  • new carpet using leftover materials from his dad’s luxury builds
  • a floating patio
  • subway tile backsplash

Total invested in repairs: roughly $10,000

Rookie Mistakes and Hard Lessons

Even though the first deal went well, Caleb identified several mistakes:

1. He didn’t do enough due diligence

He now says he should have insisted on:

  • a full home inspection
  • septic inspection
  • well inspection
  • right-to-void protection

This was especially important because the area is known for:

  • septic problems
  • shallow wells

2. He overpaid on loan costs

He learned that his lending fees were much higher than they should have been:

  • origination fee was around 1.75%
  • he believes a more normal range would have been around 0.5%–0.75%
  • total lending fees were close to $10,000

Takeaway: lenders do compete, and borrowers should shop around.

Why He Changed Strategy in Northern Virginia

After moving back to Northern Virginia, Caleb realized the traditional rental model didn’t make sense in that market.

Why long-term rentals didn’t work

  • Home prices were too high
  • Cash flow was weak or nonexistent
  • Many buyers were purchasing mainly for appreciation
  • A typical rental could easily be negative cash flow after expenses

He concluded that buying and holding indefinitely in his market didn’t fit his financial goals.

New Strategy: Live-In Flip

Caleb shifted toward a live-in flip approach, which he defines as:

  • buying a property below market value
  • renovating it while living there
  • selling after at least two years to capture primary-residence tax benefits

Why he likes this strategy

  • avoids short-term capital gains in many cases
  • provides upside from appreciation and renovation value
  • gives flexibility if the market turns down
  • aligns better with expensive markets like Northern Virginia

The “Failed” Flip That Made Him Money

Caleb’s next major deal looked like it could become a full live-in flip, but a zoning issue derailed the plan.

Initial deal details

  • Contract price: $325,000
  • Later renegotiated to $285,000
  • Seller credit: $7,000
  • He got money back at closing, including about $1,500

What went wrong

During due diligence and permit review, he discovered major issues:

  • the kitchen was built over a finished porch
  • the addition would require significant demolition
  • zoning required a boundary line adjustment
  • the property sat on two lots and had to be combined before permits could move forward

He spent weeks going back and forth with county officials and supervisors, but the permit process stalled.

What he did instead

Rather than continue waiting, he sold the property to another investor.

Final result

  • Bought for: $285,000
  • Sold for: $355,000
  • Held for: under two months
  • Profit: a little over $60,000

This was a strong example of adapting quickly when the original plan stopped making sense.

Relationships and Activity Created the Opportunities

A major theme of the episode is that Caleb’s deals came from consistent action and relationships:

  • knocking on doors
  • mailing letters
  • following up repeatedly
  • networking with agents and flippers
  • asking questions and staying visible

Even when a specific property didn’t work out, the interaction often led to another opportunity.

Examples

  • A door knock on one distressed property led to a referral on another one
  • A conversation with a co-listing agent led to a triplex opportunity
  • A friend in the business sent him a deal that fit his goals

How He Plans to Manage Rentals Going Forward

Caleb is now preparing to become a landlord, but he plans to do it realistically.

His approach

  • continue using the existing property management company
  • factor in a 10% management fee
  • avoid self-managing from a distance
  • treat management as an expense, not a free service

He believes the property still works even with professional management built in.

Caleb’s Long-Term Plan

Caleb’s future strategy is two-pronged:

1. Continue looking for live-in flips

He is:

  • sending 20–25 letters per day
  • tracking about 500 properties on a rotating basis
  • targeting older ramblers in Western Loudoun
  • focusing on properties owned by long-term sellers with high equity

2. Buy cash-flowing real estate in cheaper markets

He also wants to keep acquiring properties where:

  • cash flow is possible
  • appreciation still exists
  • tax benefits can be used against his active income

As a real estate professional, he also wants to use the tax advantages that come with commercial-style investing.

Key Takeaways

  • Waiting on a deal can cost more than taking a careful shot.
  • Real estate success often comes from action, not perfection.
  • Always do full due diligence on septic, wells, inspection, and permits.
  • Shop lenders and loan fees aggressively.
  • In expensive markets, traditional rentals may not cash flow well enough.
  • A live-in flip can be a smart way to combine appreciation, flexibility, and tax efficiency.
  • Relationships create deal flow; one opportunity often leads to the next.
  • Even a “failed” deal can become a strong win if you adapt quickly.

Caleb’s Final Advice and Positioning

Caleb’s overall message is that there’s value in:

  • being active
  • staying in motion
  • asking questions
  • following up
  • using your unique career advantages

He sees real estate as a long game, and his experience so far shows that persistence and flexibility matter just as much as having the “perfect” plan.