Data Skeptic

<p>Doug Bowman, Professor of Computer Science at Virginia Tech, joins Kyle to explore how augmented reality, virtual reality, and AI are reshaping the future of human-computer interaction. From wearable virtual workspaces to intelligent interfaces that adapt to our surroundings, they discuss the opportunities, challenges, and privacy concerns of a world where computing extends beyond the screen.</p>

<p>What if we could 3D print food with customized flavors and textures? Yamato Miyatake joins us to explore how digital food fabrication, human-computer interaction, and AI could transform the future of cooking and dining.</p>

<p>The next evolution of wearable technology may not require new screens or controllers, but new ways to interact with the devices we already wear. Shimon explores how gesture-sensing earbuds could transform virtual reality and wearable computing through intuitive, user-centered interactions that make technology more accessible and adaptable.</p>

<p>How do we design robots and autonomous vehicles that understand the unwritten rules of human behavior? Kyle speaks with Cornell Tech professor Wendy Ju about implicit interaction, "Wizard of Oz" prototyping, and what studying pedestrians, self-driving cars, and even robotic furniture can teach us about designing technology that behaves the way people expect.</p>

<p><span data-sheets-root="1">The data we collect about ourselves can tell us a lot—but only if the technology collecting it actually fits into our lives. Daniel Epstein explores personal informatics, from fitness trackers and food journals to baby tracking and AI, and explains why abandoning a tracking tool doesn't necessarily mean it failed.</span></p>

<p>In the final episode of our Recommender Systems season, we explore the growing questions of trust, manipulation, privacy, fairness, sustainability, and user control. From fake reviews and shilling attacks to explainable recommendations and user-selected algorithms, we look at what happens when recommender systems must answer not only for what they recommend, but for the consequences of those choices.</p>

<p>In part two of the Data Skeptic Recommender Systems season finale, Kyle asks a deceptively difficult question: what should recommender systems actually optimize for? Drawing on conversations from across the season, the episode explores engagement, filter bubbles, popularity bias, fairness, human curation, embeddings, and the growing role—and risks—of large language models in shaping what gets recommended to us.</p>

<p>Where did recommender systems come from, and how do we know when they're actually working? In part one of Data Skeptic's three-part Recommender Systems finale, Kyle traces the field from collaborative filtering and the Netflix Prize to matrix factorization and modern approaches, while exploring why accuracy alone can't capture what makes a recommendation useful, surprising, or meaningful.</p>

<p>Recommender systems influence nearly every aspect of our digital lives—but what does it mean for those systems to be fair? Robin Burke joins Data Skeptic to discuss the history of recommender systems, the limitations of optimizing purely for accuracy, and how ideas from social choice theory can help balance the needs of users, creators, and society. The conversation explores the future of recommendation algorithms and why fairness is a far more complex challenge than it first appears.</p>

<p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer" data-start="1442" data-end="1922">News recommendation algorithms influence far more than what stories we click—they can shape our understanding of the world. In this episode, Kyle Polich speaks with Andreea Iana about responsible AI, filter bubbles, multilingual news recommendation, and her open-source NewsRecLib framework for evaluating recommender systems. They explore why bigger models aren't always better and how future recommendation systems can balance personalization with diversity and societal impact.</p>

<p>What if you could simply tell a recommendation system what you want instead of relying on likes, dislikes, and watch history? Kyle Polich talks with Fuyuan Lyu about the DPR framework, which combines large language models and traditional recommender systems to give users direct control over recommendations through natural language. Together they explore how conversational interfaces could transform platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and news feeds while preserving the strengths of modern recommendation algorithms.</p>

<p>How can researchers audit recommendation systems when the algorithms are hidden from view? Hieu Le joins Kyle Polich to discuss Auto-Like, a reinforcement learning framework that systematically explores how platforms like TikTok personalize content feeds. The conversation covers recommendation transparency, black-box auditing, and the future of platform accountability.</p>

<p>Aaron Payne, an MBA student at Georgia Tech studying business analytics and a Senior Insights Analyst at Chick-fil-A, joins Kyle Polich to talk about turning analytics into decisions that matter. They unpack a real-world forecasting project with Comfama in Colombia, including messy data realities, interpretability tradeoffs, and why "data science for good" starts with the people impacted.</p>

<p>Kyle Polich sits down with Yashar Deldjoo, research scientist and Associate Professor at the Polytechnic University of Bari, to explore how recommender systems have evolved and why trustworthiness matters. They unpack key dimensions of responsible AI, including robustness to adversarial attacks, privacy, explainability, and fairness, and discuss how LLMs introduce new risks like hallucinations.</p> <p>The episode closes with a look at "agentic" recommender systems, where tools and memory shift recommendations from ranked lists to end-to-end task completion.</p>

<p>Goodreads star ratings can be misleading as measures of "book quality," and research from Hannes Rosenbusch suggests that for many professionally published books, differences between readers often matter more than differences between books. The episode also explores how to model reader preferences, why reviews often reveal more about the reviewer than the text, and how LLMs can aid computational literary research while still falling short of human editors in creative writing. <!-- notionvc: f198d4f9-8d25-445d-990a-10505e5a819e --></p>

<p>Ekaterina (Kat) Filadova from MIT EECS joins us to discuss strategic learning in recommender systems—what happens when users collectively coordinate to game recommendation algorithms. Kat's research reveals surprising findings: algorithmic "protest movements" can paradoxically help platforms by providing clearer preference signals, and the challenge of distinguishing coordinated behavior from bot activity is more complex than it appears. This episode explores the intersection of machine learning and game theory, examining what happens when your training data actively responds to your algorithm.</p>

<p>Anas Buhayh discusses multi-stakeholder fairness in recommender systems and the S'mores framework—a simulation allowing users to choose between mainstream and niche algorithms. His research shows specialized recommenders improve utility for niche users while raising questions about filter bubbles and data privacy.</p>

<p>In this episode, host Kyle Polich speaks with Roan Schellingerhout, a fourth-year PhD student at Maastricht University, about explainable multi-stakeholder recommender systems for job recruitment. Roan discusses his research on creating AI-powered job matching systems that balance the needs of multiple stakeholders—job seekers, recruiters, HR professionals, and companies. The conversation explores different types of explanations for job recommendations, including textual, bar chart, and graph-based formats, with findings showing that lay users strongly prefer simple textual explanations over more technical visualizations. Roan shares insights from his "healthy friction" study, which tested whether users could distinguish between real AI-generated explanations and randomly generated ones, revealing that participants often used explanations as information sources rather than decision-making tools.</p> <p>The discussion delves into the technical architecture behind these systems, including the use of knowledge graphs built from tabular data, inference rules, and large language models to generate human-friendly explanations. Roan explains how his research aims to open the black box of recommender systems, making them more transparent and trustworthy for non-technical users. Looking forward, he discusses ongoing work on automated knowledge graph construction from resumes and job listings, research into fairness considerations around gender and location, and plans for real-world testing with actual job seekers. The episode concludes with Roan's vision for the future: AI systems that support rather than replace human recruiters, making the job search process less grueling while maintaining the essential human judgment that recruitment requires.</p> <p> </p>

<p>In this episode, we explore the fascinating world of recommender systems and algorithmic fairness with David Liu, Assistant Research Professor at Cornell University's Center for Data Science for Enterprise and Society. David shares insights from his research on how machine learning models can inadvertently create unfairness, particularly for minority and niche user groups, even without any malicious intent. We dive deep into his groundbreaking work on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and collaborative filtering, examining why these fundamental techniques sometimes fail to serve all users equally.</p> <p>David introduces the concept of "power niche users" - highly active users with specialized interests who generate valuable data that can benefit the entire platform. We discuss his paper "When Collaborative Filtering Is Not Collaborative," which reveals how PCA can over-specialize on popular content while neglecting both niche items and even failing to properly recommend popular artists to new potential fans. David presents solutions through item-weighted PCA and thoughtful data upweighting strategies that can improve both fairness and performance simultaneously, challenging the common assumption that these goals must be in tension. The conversation spans from theoretical insights to practical applications at companies like Meta, offering a comprehensive look at the future of personalized recommendations.</p> <p> </p>