Overview of Undisclosed: Unfiltered 5.7.2026
This weekly “unfiltered” episode covers a mix of true-crime updates, legal analysis, and listener feedback. The hosts open with a response to criticism about UFO-related commentary, then discuss three major stories: a tragic double-homicide case involving University of South Florida doctoral students, a privacy/discovery dispute involving Talkspace therapy records in a pregnancy-discrimination lawsuit, and a Third Circuit ruling narrowing how police must account for self-defense evidence when filing arrest affidavits.
Listener Mail and UFO Discussion
The episode begins with Rabia responding to a disgruntled listener email objecting to her discussion of UFOs, government briefings, and Matt Gaetz’s claims.
Main points
- Rabia says she was not citing Matt Gaetz as a reliable source, only using his comments to suggest that some lawmakers say they’ve received alarming briefings.
- The hosts jokingly but plainly state that they believe in UFOs/alien life and that Rabia also believes in God.
- Rabia acknowledges the criticism but doubles down that the point was about corroboration among public comments from lawmakers, not proof of any conspiracy.
Case 1: University of South Florida Students Missing and Killed
Mito covers the disappearance and murders of two University of South Florida doctoral students, Jamil Limon and Nahida Bristi, and the investigation into their roommate, Hisham Abu... (surname unclear in transcript).
What happened
- The students went missing in mid-April.
- Investigators found Limon’s passport, wallet, and bloodstained duct tape in the apartment trash.
- Limon’s body was later found in heavy-duty trash bags near a bridge.
- Bristi’s remains were later discovered in a bag by kayakers.
Key investigative details
- Authorities focused on one roommate after:
- inconsistent alibi details,
- GPS data,
- and ChatGPT searches about how to dispose of a body and whether trash bags could conceal remains.
- Another roommate told police that he and Limon had previously complained about Hisham’s erratic behavior and feared for their safety.
- Hisham was found at his family’s home, where he had barricaded himself, and was arrested after a SWAT standoff.
Background on the suspect
- He had prior arrests in 2023 for violence toward family members and burglary-related charges.
- He had been subject to a 72-hour emergency mental health hold and a domestic violence protective order, though the order later expired.
- He completed a diversion program in 2024, which apparently helped clear his record enough to pass an apartment background check.
Legal/ethical questions raised
- Could the murders have been prevented if the apartment complex or police had acted differently?
- Could the defense argue mental illness or an insanity defense?
- Do the ChatGPT searches help show planning/premeditation rather than instability?
Case 2: Talkspace Therapy Records, Discovery, and AI Training
Rabia discusses a litigation issue involving Jennifer Kamras, a nurse practitioner who sued AdventHealth after being terminated while nine months pregnant.
The lawsuit
- Kamras filed a pregnancy discrimination claim.
- She had been using Talkspace through her employer’s benefits for therapy.
- Her legal team called her Talkspace therapist to testify about her emotional state and the circumstances around her termination.
Why the case matters
- Once the therapist was used as a witness, the defense obtained all of the Talkspace session records through court order.
- Those records included word-for-word transcripts of therapy chats, audio, and video communications.
Privacy and legal concerns
- Talkspace reportedly stores vast amounts of client communications and has described its database as one of the largest mental health datasets in the world.
- The company’s terms reportedly allow use of client communications to develop new products, including AI tools.
- The episode raises concerns about:
- HIPAA and psychotherapy privilege,
- the difference between therapy notes and treatment records,
- and whether consumers understand how much of their therapy may be discoverable in litigation.
Legal takeaway
- Colin explains that by calling the psychotherapist to testify, the plaintiff likely opened the door to related records being admitted.
- The broader point: if you introduce privileged communications in your case, you may waive protection over the underlying sessions.
Case 3: Self-Defense, Arrest Warrants, and Malicious Prosecution
Colin covers a Third Circuit decision involving a fatal altercation outside a strip club in Erie, Pennsylvania.
Facts of the case
- During a fight, Cory Kendig was attacked by a group of men.
- Video showed him being choked and assaulted.
- Kendig shot Jeremy Jones in the stomach, and Jones later died.
Police/prosecutor conduct
- The lead investigator filed an arrest affidavit for murder and related charges.
- The affidavit allegedly did not mention the video or self-defense evidence.
- Kendig was later acquitted when a jury accepted his self-defense argument.
Civil rights lawsuit
- Kendig sued, claiming malicious prosecution.
- The defense argued qualified immunity and said self-defense is different from “evidence of innocence.”
Third Circuit’s ruling
- The court rejected the idea that self-defense is not evidence of innocence.
- It held that when officers or prosecutors file an affidavit, they must include evidence that conclusively establishes innocence or an affirmative defense.
- However, the court said this rule was not clearly established at the time, so Kendig still loses on qualified immunity.
Why the hosts found it important
- They liked the ruling as a step against qualified immunity, but were uneasy with the word “conclusively”, which may set too high a threshold.
- They noted the decision could influence how future affidavits and arrests are handled when video or other evidence strongly supports self-defense.
Additional Notes and Housekeeping
- The hosts mention that a new Undisclosed season is coming soon, with a trailer expected in the coming weeks.
- The episode closes with standard show credits and reminders about:
- the Facebook group,
- SpeakPipe voice notes,
- Patreon tiers,
- and social media accounts.
Key Takeaways
- True-crime / legal systems: The episode emphasizes how background checks, mental health intervention, and institutional response can fail in violent cases.
- Privacy law: Therapy platforms may expose users to surprising discovery risks, especially when therapy becomes part of a legal claim.
- Qualified immunity: Courts continue to refine how much exculpatory evidence police must disclose before seeking an arrest warrant.
- Tone of the show: Even in an “unfiltered” format, the hosts mix legal analysis with personal banter and occasional corrective commentary on their own public remarks.