S8 Ep6: S8, The State v. Patricia Rorrer - Addendum 3

Summary of S8 Ep6: S8, The State v. Patricia Rorrer - Addendum 3

by Undisclosed

38m•June 11, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of Undisclosed Addendum 3

This addendum opens with a timely legal update out of Alabama on the constitutionality of nitrogen gas executions, then pivots back to Episode 3 of the Patricia Rorrer series, “Leads to Nowhere.” The discussion focuses on early investigative missteps, Andy’s polygraphs and alibi, questionable family timelines, possible paternity doubts, and troubling forensic handling of evidence.

Alabama Execution Update: Nitrogen Gas vs. Firing Squad

  • The hosts discuss a federal ruling in Alabama that found the state’s planned nitrogen gas execution method likely violates the Eighth Amendment because it can cause:
    • severe air hunger
    • emotional distress
    • anxiety and physiological stress
    • physical discomfort before asphyxiation
  • The inmate, Jeffrey Lee, argued he should instead be executed by firing squad.
  • The judge agreed that a firing squad could cause a rapid loss of consciousness and potentially a quicker, less painful death than nitrogen gas.
  • Rabia and Jennifer both expressed discomfort with the entire framing, noting that all the methods being compared are still fundamentally barbaric and archaic.
  • Colin noted the disturbing irony of modern capital punishment debates sounding like a return to centuries-old methods.

Episode 3 of the Patricia Rorrer Series: “Leads to Nowhere”

Early Suspicion Falls on Andy

  • The episode centers on the early investigation, when Andy becomes the prime suspect in the disappearance of Joe and Alex.
  • The hosts emphasize that the investigation generated many leads, but most went nowhere, especially regarding alternate suspects and ex-partners.

Andy’s Polygraph Results

  • Andy took at least two polygraphs, and the first one showed deception on multiple questions.
  • His explanation for the failed answer was that he had moved a vibrator/sex toy before police searched the home.
  • The hosts were skeptical that this could explain deceptive responses to questions about:
    • withholding information about the disappearance
    • knowing where his wife and son were
    • misleading investigators
    • personal involvement in the disappearance
  • Rabia suggested he may have had a ready-made excuse in case he failed.
  • Jennifer noted the vibrator explanation seemed like a stretch, especially as a response to questions unrelated to the object itself.

The Missing FBI Polygraph Record

  • The episode references a third polygraph reportedly administered by the FBI.
  • The hosts say there is no copy of the results in the records they currently have.
  • Rabia said she had already filed a FOIA request for it, and Jennifer confirmed a request had also been submitted, but nothing had been returned.

Andy’s Alibi and Family Witnesses

The Worksite Alibi

  • Andy claimed he spent the day working with his father at a house owned by Kathy and Tom Holschwander.
  • The hosts point out that this alibi has major weaknesses:
    • the timeline is vague
    • there are gaps in the morning when Andy could have been alone
    • his father is not a neutral witness
    • even the father’s version does not cover the full disappearance window

The Mother’s Phone Call

  • Andy’s mother claimed she called Joe around 1:15 p.m.
  • According to her, Joe said she was about to leave and meet up with her.
  • The hosts found her later follow-up call — whether at 3 p.m. or 4 p.m. depending on the report — highly suspicious, especially given the long delay and lack of apparent concern.
  • Rabia strongly questioned the story, saying it didn’t make sense that a concerned grandmother would wait so long to follow up if she believed plans were changed.

Family Dynamics and Possible Covering

  • A listener comment suggested Andy’s parents may have been covering for him.
  • The hosts discussed how the family’s stories create more questions than answers, especially around exact times and who actually saw Andy that day.

Paternity Questions About Alex

  • The episode also raises whether Alex was actually Andy’s biological son.
  • This comes from reports that:
    • Andy had previous long-term partners who did not become pregnant
    • some reportedly did not use birth control
    • other people in Andy’s orbit also found the pregnancy surprising
  • Rabia said it is a fair question given the circumstances, though not proof of anything by itself.
  • Jennifer added that even if paternity was uncertain, doubt alone could be relevant to motive or relationship dynamics.

Patricia’s Call to Andy

  • The hosts clarify that Patricia had already known Andy was married and had a child before the key phone call.
  • So the State’s theory is not that she suddenly learned he had a wife and baby, but that she became angry when Joe reportedly yelled at her and hung up.
  • Rabia explained that Patricia was already in the habit of keeping in touch with former partners, and Andy was not the only ex she contacted.
  • They also note that Patricia’s call happened while she was dealing with major personal events, including a horse-riding competition in Oklahoma.

Forensic Concerns: Hair, Blood, and Sloppy Evidence Handling

  • One of the most disturbing issues discussed is a blonde hair found in Joe’s car in an area associated with the driver’s seat.
  • Early file notes said the material was positive for blood, suggesting it might yield a blood type or DNA profile.
  • But later testimony from Dr. Jensen said he could not verify it was blood, creating a troubling inconsistency.
  • Rabia and Jennifer argue that the problem may have been:
    • poor evidence collection
    • contamination
    • mishandling of samples
    • use of Post-it notes instead of standard evidence collection methods
  • The hosts criticized the storage process as unorthodox and likely damaging to the evidence.

Discovery of the Bodies

  • The episode ends with the discovery of Joe and Alex’s bodies about four months later.
  • The hosts clarify the discovery was made by a farmer, Paul Kovalchuk, while plowing a field, with Trooper Joseph Vasquez involved in the response.
  • Rabia says the field layout still raises difficult questions about how the bodies could have remained undiscovered for so long.

What’s Coming Next

  • The hosts preview Episode 4, which will focus on:
    • the crime scene
    • the autopsies
    • the cause of death
    • the injuries sustained by Joe
  • Rabia says she has not recently spoken with Patty but hopes to check in soon.

Key Takeaways

  • The Alabama execution discussion highlights how unsettled and morally fraught capital punishment remains.
  • In the Patricia Rorrer case, the hosts see Andy’s alibi, family stories, and polygraphs as deeply unreliable.
  • The forensic record appears sloppy and contaminated, especially regarding the hair and blood evidence.
  • The episode strengthens the case that the early investigation may have been steered by weak assumptions rather than solid evidence.