Millennials are getting old

Summary of Millennials are getting old

by Vox

25mJanuary 30, 2026

Overview of Today Explained — "Millennials are getting old"

This Vox episode (hosted by Deja Tolentino and Estet Herndon) links two related internet-cultural phenomena: the wave of nostalgia for 2016 across social platforms and the psychological/biological realities of aging as early millennials approach midlife. It features reporting from Deja Tolentino on the 2016 revival online and a conversation with Emily Gould (New York Magazine) about aging, the “44 cliff” research, and how millennials are grappling with getting older.

Key takeaways

  • 2016 nostalgia is a major internet trend in 2026, driven largely by TikTok and Gen Z re-romanticizing mid-2010s culture (music, aesthetics, influencers).
  • The “2016 vibe” is associated with the rise of influencer culture, maximalist makeup, Snapchat-era filters, and an early-algorithm social internet that felt more like a shared monoculture.
  • Nostalgia for 2016 partly reflects dissatisfaction with the present: political/economic turmoil of the 2020s, fragmentation of shared culture, and a loss of forward-looking optimism.
  • A Stanford-linked study (reported widely) highlights biological “aging cliffs” around ages 44 and 60—media coverage made age 44 feel like a milestone for becoming “middle-aged.”
  • Emily Gould argues the healthiest approach to aging is psychological: acceptance, open-mindedness, resilience, gratitude for the social/emotional benefits of aging, rather than treating aging as a problem to be fixed by anti-aging products.

Topics discussed

  • What “2016 vibes” look and sound like: Chainsmokers, Drake’s “One Dance,” Kylie-era pop culture, makeup gurus, mannequin challenge, pink wall aesthetic.
  • Metrics showing the resurgence: TikTok searches for “2016” surged (reported 452%), Spotify 2016 playlists up ~71% year-over-year (compared to 2024).
  • Cultural reasons for nostalgia: last shared monoculture, perceived optimism/low stakes, rise of influencer monetization and algorithmic feeds.
  • Risks of persistent nostalgia: inability to imagine better futures; cultural stagnation and escapism.
  • The biology and psychology of aging: personal stories of abrupt changes at 44, the anti‑aging industry, and mindset strategies to age well.
  • How millennials’ financial instability and life-course differences (housing, career paths) may shape their experience of aging.

Notable data & quotes

  • Data cited: TikTok searches for “2016” +452%; Spotify 2016 playlist listens +71% (year-over-year vs 2024).
  • Memorable quotes:
    • “It was one of the last years in which we engaged in a monoculture together.”
    • “Staying young is in some part a matter of appreciating the opportunity to get old.” — Emily Gould (summarizing a mindset shift toward gratitude and acceptance)
    • “It gets better.” — recurring reassurance about aging and life trajectory.

Recommendations / Practical takeaways

  • If nostalgia feels consuming, try balancing it with curiosity for new cultural currents and small creative experiments to imagine forward-looking alternatives.
  • For approaching midlife:
    • Prioritize mindset: openness to change, willingness to be wrong, gratitude for hard-earned perspective.
    • Build social connections across ages—older people who accept aging often model the most sustainable mindsets.
    • Consider incremental, realistic health habits rather than expensive “anti-aging” quick fixes.
    • Financial planning: recognize economic differences facing many millennials (housing and stability) and take pragmatic steps where possible (budgeting, retirement planning).
  • For creators and brands: nostalgia can be a useful cultural touchstone but overreliance risks creative stagnation.

Who appears / production notes

  • Reporting and interviews: Deja Tolentino (internet culture reporter, newsletter Yap Year) and Emily Gould (novelist and New York Magazine feature writer).
  • Recommended reading: Gould’s New York Magazine piece “Falling Off the Aging Cliff at 44” (referenced in the episode).
  • Episode production: produced by Danielle Hewitt; edited by Amina Alsadi; fact-checking by Andrea Lopez Cruzado; engineers Bridger Dunnigan and David Tattashore.