‘House of the Dragon’ Is Back. Was It Worth the Wait? Plus, ‘Star City’ Episode 5.

Summary of ‘House of the Dragon’ Is Back. Was It Worth the Wait? Plus, ‘Star City’ Episode 5.

by The Ringer

1h 14mJune 22, 2026

Overview of The Watch

Chris Ryan and Andy Greenwald spend most of the episode on two major TV conversations: the return of House of the Dragon and the fifth episode of Star City. Along the way, they also touch on streaming-business shakeups, a few cancellation stories, and some lighter banter about family life, music, and British politics. The core theme of the episode is simple: when a franchise is good, how much does it matter that it’s also becoming more like a locked-in IP machine?

House of the Dragon: Big spectacle, real craftsmanship, lingering frustration

What they liked

  • The show’s production values are still exceptional: dragons, water, battle staging, and visual effects all drew strong praise.
  • Ryan Condal and the team have found a better storytelling rhythm, especially in how they handle exposition and worldbuilding.
  • The episode’s naval battle and dragon action were singled out as particularly impressive.
  • They appreciated small character moments and side plots, especially:
    • Aegon and Larys’ road-trip dynamic
    • the low-born dragon rider storyline
    • the sense that the show is finally comfortable with its own scale and machinery

Their main critique

  • The big issue remains that House of the Dragon feels like a historical document rather than an open-ended drama.
  • Because the outcome is already baked in, the show can feel more like homework than discovery.
  • They argued that the series would likely work better if it were compressed into fewer, tighter seasons.
  • They also felt the show’s themes—war, power, dragons as weapons, and the cost of ambition—are often strong in concept but not always fully felt emotionally.

Big-picture take

  • They compared House of the Dragon to Star Wars-style franchise storytelling, where the world is now large enough to support different tones and levels of seriousness.
  • Their joke analogy: the Targaryens are basically the Jedi of Westeros.
  • They noted that Night of the Seven Kingdoms proves the franchise can support multiple creative modes, not just the mainline dynastic conflict.

Structural complaint

  • A recurring frustration was that the episode feels like it should have been the end of a season, not the start of one.
  • They suggested that if the second season had ended with the kind of major fallout they discussed—especially Jace’s death at the Battle of the Gullet—the season would have felt more complete and more powerful.

Star City Episode 5: Spycraft, timing, and a very strong episode

Why they liked it

  • Both hosts were enthusiastic, with Chris calling it one of the best shows on TV.
  • Episode 5 was praised for its pacing and structure:
    • it starts immediately after the previous episode’s reveal
    • it doesn’t waste time
    • it keeps the audience off balance in a good way

What stood out

  • The episode’s espionage beats are familiar, but the show deploys them with confidence.
  • They especially loved:
    • the Valya/Tanya scene outside the training center
    • Irina’s escalating mole plot
    • the visual storytelling in the secretarial pool sequence, where the camera quietly reveals who may have seen what
  • They praised the direction by Cassia Adamic, noting the episode’s strong handheld style and clean visual paranoia.

Bigger plot points

  • The show is building toward a secret Soviet mission to Venus, which they found absurd, ambitious, and fun.
  • They also discussed the complexity of the mole setup and the idea that an American spy is embedded in a mission to space.

TV business, cancellations, and streaming strategy

The Boroughs cancellation

  • They discussed Netflix canceling The Boroughs despite strong viewership signals.
  • Their read: the cancellation likely came down to cost, streaming math, and behind-the-scenes business politics, not creative failure.
  • They used it as a jumping-off point to criticize how opaque streaming economics have become.

Amazon and Luca Guadagnino’s Artificial

  • They also talked about Amazon shelving Guadagnino’s OpenAI-adjacent project.
  • The conversation focused on how tech ownership, corporate optics, and entertainment are increasingly intertwined.

Bigger industry takeaway

  • They returned to the same concern several times: streaming companies care deeply about share price and business optics, often at the expense of clear creative logic.
  • The hosts also pointed out that viewers rarely know how these shows are actually monetized, which makes the cancellation math hard to evaluate from the outside.

Lighter detours and banter

Parent corner

  • Much of the opening banter centered on:
    • a bat mitzvah weekend
    • dance-floor politics
    • generational differences in teen party music
  • They joked about how current kids’ dance-floor favorites are driven by TikTok culture.

Movie and music talk

  • Chris briefly reviewed Toy Story 5, which he loved and described as surprisingly smart and emotionally effective.
  • They also riffed on Olivia Rodrigo, Weezer, and Pinkerton, mostly as a joke about online music discourse.

British politics

  • They ended with a spirited discussion of Andy Burnham and the state of UK politics, treating it like its own kind of serialized drama.

Bottom line

  • Best thing on TV right now: Star City, at least in their view.
  • Most impressive franchise return: House of the Dragon, though it still struggles with the limitations of being a preordained story.
  • Main recurring theme: modern TV is strongest when it either surprises you structurally or earns its inevitability emotionally—ideally both.