Part 2: Sony Film CEO on Marvel’s Decline and Hollywood’s Originality Crisis

Summary of Part 2: Sony Film CEO on Marvel’s Decline and Hollywood’s Originality Crisis

by The Ringer

32mFebruary 24, 2026

Overview of Part 2: Sony Film CEO on Marvel’s Decline and Hollywood’s Originality Crisis

This episode of The Town features Tom Rothman (head of Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group) in a wide-ranging conversation about the future of Spider-Man, Sony’s partnership with Marvel/Disney, Kevin Feige’s run and recent Marvel challenges, the role of movie stars vs. IP, streaming’s impact on theatrical windows and openings, and what Rothman views as the biggest industry problem today: a crisis of originality.

Key topics covered

  • The Spider-Man franchise: Sony–Marvel partnership, box office performance, and future plans (including Spider-Verse).
  • Kevin Feige and Marvel’s creative trajectory—why Rothman still trusts Feige but sees overreach.
  • The continued importance (and scarcity) of true movie stars in the theatrical era.
  • Streaming vs. theatrical: how PVOD/short windows affect opening weekends and audience habits.
  • Rothman’s prescription for windows (45 days to transactional, 100 days to free) and why he thinks Disney already leads here.
  • The core industry crisis: lack of original mid‑budget films and where the next franchises will come from.
  • Exhibition economics: admissions decline, ticket pricing spiral, and the risk of movies becoming a luxury good.
  • Side segments: James Bond casting speculation and industry anecdotes.

Main takeaways

  • Sony’s Spider-Man deal with Marvel/Disney was strategic and mutually beneficial — it revitalized the franchise by tying Spider-Man into the MCU via Tony Stark, and yielded massive box office (No Way Home ~ $1.9B; Rothman believes it would have exceeded $2B with China).
  • Kevin Feige remains a creative force; Rothman attributes some recent Marvel fatigue to overextended interconnectivity and heavy TV tie-ins (a prior Disney mandate), but thinks “less may be more” going forward.
  • Movie stars still matter—perhaps more now because there are fewer of them. Scarcity of appearance choices builds trust in their projects; streaming does not reliably create movie stars.
  • Short or simultaneous streaming windows damage opening weekends. The measurable harm shows up in diminished openings, not necessarily weekend-to-weekend drops.
  • Rothman advocates clear, robust theatrical windows (45 days to transactional, 100 days to free) to preserve the theatrical value chain and support originality.
  • The industry’s biggest problem is originality: mid-budget original films struggle without theatrical urgency or pre-existing IP. Restoring windows and cultural urgency are needed to revive original franchises.
  • Exhibition must avoid a pricing spiral: higher ticket prices mask lower admissions and risk turning moviegoing into a luxury, reducing audience breadth.

Notable quotes and soundbites

  • “Fix the windows. Fix the windows.” (Rothman’s repeated prescription.)
  • “Scarcity has value.”
  • “Streaming doesn't make movie stars.”
  • “There are only two reasons people go to the movies: experiential (big-screen spectacle) and story-based (a story, a star).”
  • On Marvel: “Never bet against Jim Cameron. And never bet against Kevin Feige.”
  • On No Way Home and China: Rothman says the film’s reported $1.9B would have gone over $2B if it had released in China; he also recounts being asked to remove the Statue of Liberty for China.

Data / concrete figures mentioned

  • Spider-Man: No Way Home grossed about $1.9 billion worldwide (Rothman believes >$2B with China).
  • Domestic admissions decline cited: from roughly 1.1 billion admissions (2019) to the “high 700s” (current), masking effect of price increases.
  • Recommended windows: 45 days to transactional, 100 days to free/AVOD/SVOD.

Recommendations / action items Rothman urges

For studios

  • Reinforce robust theatrical windows (his suggested standard: 45 days to transactional, 100 days to free).
  • Keep investing in original storytelling and take risks — but recognize the commercial pressures and need for collective industry practices that preserve theatrical value.

For exhibitors

  • Avoid aggressive price hikes that further depress admissions; focus on improving the in-theater experience to preserve breadth of audience.

For the industry at large

  • Rebuild cultural urgency for theatrical releases (marketing, eventization).
  • Support the development pipeline that can generate new franchises rather than relying solely on pre‑branded IP.

Contextual notes and nuances

  • Rothman stresses antitrust and trade‑association limits on coordinating studio behavior, so the industry’s collective response is complicated legally and practically.
  • He defends studio executives’ motives: many genuinely want originality but are constrained by shareholders, employees, and the need to deliver reliable hits.
  • He acknowledges experimentation (short windows, PVOD) post-COVID, but argues those experiments revealed harms, especially to opening weekend performance.
  • He sees Netflix potentially evolving to adopt windows if it wants studio assets to perform long-term and preserve the theatrical ecosystem.

Side discussion highlights

  • Spider-Verse: Rothman says the franchise will return but as “a fresh reboot” with new creative teams.
  • Movie-star list examples Rothman cited or praised: Timothée Chalamet, Tom Holland, Zendaya, Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, Denzel Washington, Tom Hanks; he notes there are fewer “guaranteed” stars today, making each more valuable.
  • Bond casting: hosts skeptical Jacob Elordi will be chosen; no casting finalized and script still in development (Stephen Knight writing).

Bottom line

Tom Rothman’s core argument: theatrical movies and originality can be saved — but only if the industry preserves theatrical windows, treats cinema as an event (restoring scarcity/value), avoids a damaging price spiral at exhibition, and keeps taking creative risks to develop new original franchises. Streaming has benefits, but its current models and short windows have real, measurable harms to openings and to the ecosystem that cultivates movie stars and original films.