Disney's Biggest Swings and Misses, Plus Iger vs. Eisner—With the Acquired Guys

Summary of Disney's Biggest Swings and Misses, Plus Iger vs. Eisner—With the Acquired Guys

by The Ringer

41m•August 28, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of Disney's Biggest Swings and Misses, Plus Iger vs. Eisner—With the Acquired Guys

Matt Belloni talks with Ben Gilbert and David Rosenthal of Acquired about the Walt Disney Company’s long history of near-failures, bold acquisitions, and strategic pivots. The conversation centers on how Disney built its modern empire, where it has stumbled in the streaming era, and whether Bob Iger or Michael Eisner deserves more credit for shaping the company’s success.

Disney’s Core Advantage: A Brand People Love

A major theme is that Disney’s biggest asset is not just individual franchises, but the Disney brand itself.

  • Disney benefits from unusually strong “studio-level” brand equity.
  • That same strength becomes a liability when the company misses repeatedly, since audiences expect excellence.
  • The hosts note that Disney can’t behave like Netflix or other studios because its brand carries a much higher bar.
  • This makes Disney both more powerful and more constrained than its competitors.

The Company Has Nearly Collapsed More Than Once

The episode emphasizes how often Disney has come close to disaster despite its iconic status.

Early 1980s Crisis

  • Disney was in serious trouble before the Bass brothers stepped in.
  • The company was vulnerable to corporate raiders and effectively had to use a takeover defense to save itself.
  • That led to a dramatic leadership reset, bringing in executives from Paramount and Warner Bros.

Strategic Transformation Under Eisner

  • Michael Eisner is credited with turning Disney from a family-content company into a broader entertainment empire.
  • He modernized the business and made it more acquisitive and growth-oriented.
  • The hosts argue this was the foundation of the Disney most people know today.

Eisner vs. Iger: Who Was the Better CEO?

The episode spends a lot of time comparing Disney’s two most famous modern leaders.

Why Eisner Gets Credit

  • He inherited a fragile company and helped save and modernize it.
  • He oversaw major strategic moves that transformed Disney’s scale and scope.
  • His shareholder returns were much stronger by the numbers:
    • Eisner: about 22.5x stock appreciation over 21 years
    • Iger: about 5x over roughly the same period

Why Iger Still Matters

  • Iger benefited from the profitability of cable, especially ESPN.
  • He positioned Disney for the streaming era and leaned hard into IP-driven strategy.
  • His legacy may ultimately depend on how well Disney performs in the next decade.

Bottom Line

The guests lean slightly toward Eisner, mainly because of what he inherited and how much he changed the company.

Disney’s Best and Worst Acquisitions

Best Acquisition: Cap Cities / ABC / ESPN

The clear winner, in their view, is the Cap Cities/ABC deal, mainly because it brought Disney control of ESPN.

  • ESPN generated enormous operating income over time.
  • The hosts estimate ESPN has produced around $75 billion in operating profit for Disney.
  • They argue this asset funded much of Disney’s later strategic flexibility.

Strong Case for Pixar

They also make a strong case for Pixar as one of Disney’s most important deals:

  • Pixar rescued Disney animation at a time when it was struggling.
  • It brought in both IP and creative leadership.
  • It revitalized the heart of Disney’s brand flywheel.

Fox Acquisition: The Most Debated

The hosts are more skeptical of the Fox deal.

  • They agree it had the lowest ROI of Disney’s major acquisitions.
  • Disney overpaid significantly.
  • Still, the deal added valuable assets like:
    • Avatar
    • The Simpsons
    • FX
    • Additional content useful for bundling and scale

One host sees the deal as strategically useful for streaming scale; the other would rather Disney spin out some of the assets.

Streaming: Disney Was Late, and That Mattered

A major criticism is that Disney moved too slowly into streaming.

  • Disney continued licensing key content to Netflix for too long.
  • By the time Disney+ launched, the company was already behind.
  • The hosts believe Disney failed to act early enough when the shift to streaming was visible.
  • Hulu is described as a compromised, multi-owner service that never had clean strategic alignment.

Key Insight

Streaming is framed as a scale economies business, more like tech than traditional Hollywood.

  • Success depends less on individual titles than on platform scale, churn reduction, and bundle economics.
  • Disney’s late start made its streaming strategy more reactive than proactive.

The Role of ESPN Today

Despite cord-cutting fears, ESPN is not viewed as dead weight.

  • The hosts think ESPN may have already bottomed out.
  • Sports leagues still need a strong media bidder, which helps ESPN’s long-term relevance.
  • New partnerships, direct-to-consumer streaming, and league collaborations could stabilize the business.
  • ESPN remains a major driver of Disney’s overall cash flow, even if it is no longer at peak profitability.

Parks, Cruises, and the Safest Part of Disney

The conversation is very bullish on Disney’s experiences business.

  • Parks and cruises are seen as durable, high-demand assets.
  • Rising global wealth makes these offerings even more monetizable over time.
  • The guests describe this as one of the safest places to deploy capital inside the company.

The Big Creative Risk: Disney Needs the Next Cultural Breakout

The hosts worry more about Disney’s creative pipeline than its balance sheet.

  • It has been nearly a decade since Disney Animation or Pixar produced a new original mega-hit on the scale of Frozen.
  • Sequels and legacy IP are fine, but Disney needs fresh franchises to keep the flywheel going.
  • They argue the company needs new shared cultural moments that can feed:
    • box office
    • streaming
    • merchandise
    • parks

Possible Test Cases

  • Encanto is cited as a strong candidate for sequel-driven franchise building.
  • They also discuss how a modern hit like K-pop Demon Hunters shows that streaming-era cultural moments can still happen.

Notable Takeaways

  • Disney’s brand is both its greatest strength and its biggest constraint.
  • Eisner saved and modernized Disney; Iger optimized and positioned it for the next era.
  • ESPN may be Disney’s most valuable acquisition ever.
  • The Fox deal added scale, but at a very high price.
  • Disney was late to streaming and paid for it.
  • The company’s future depends on balancing:
    • brand integrity
    • streaming scale
    • parks/expeiences growth
    • and new franchise creation

Short Closing Note

The episode ends with some box-office chatter, but the real focus is Disney’s long-term identity: a company built on brand love, reinforced by acquisitions, and now trying to prove it can still create the kind of original hits that once made it unbeatable.