Don’t let your backend write checks your frontend can’t cache

Summary of Don’t let your backend write checks your frontend can’t cache

by The Stack Overflow Podcast

30m•January 20, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of Don’t let your backend write checks your frontend can’t cache

This Stack Overflow Podcast episode (host Ryan Donovan) features Prakash Chandran, CEO and co‑founder of Zeno. They discuss the growing friction between frontend dreams—especially ephemeral, AI‑generated interfaces—and the backend systems that must power them. The core message: as frontends become more dynamic and agentic, teams must rethink API design, caching, orchestration, observability and governance so backends don't become the bottleneck or a source of security/data risk.

Guest background

  • Prakash Chandran: former Google UX/product leader (design lead for Google Calendar; led design/research for Google for Business and Education). Co‑founder/CEO of Zeno (builds backend tooling/IDE for modern development).
  • Experience spans frontend UX and exposure to backend/DevOps through his co‑founder (ex‑Google Photos lead DevOps).

Main topics covered

  • Common mismatch: frontends request or assume workloads and responses that backends aren’t designed to provide or cache.
  • Server‑side rendering reduces client JS but can still overload backends if business logic isn’t properly delegated.
  • Generative AI and ephemeral UIs amplify backend complexity:
    • Many ephemeral interfaces may need to call multiple third‑party APIs and orchestrate them.
    • Users expect near‑instant responses; long, unbounded backend processing leads to perceived failure.
    • Permissioning, context, state and tooling integration are nontrivial.
  • Recommended approach: favor atomic/componentized UI units instead of generating full UIs on the fly.
  • Spec‑driven design (API specs, SDKs, Swagger/OpenAPI) must become first‑class for backends to support dynamic frontends and agentic consumption.
  • Risks of AI‑generated backend code: governance, security, scalability and lack of ownership; you must inspect and own generated code before production use.
  • Pragmatic adoption of AI:
    • Good for prototyping, internal tools and boilerplate.
    • Prefer senior engineers to co‑create with AI; require juniors to keep writing code for learning.
    • Use AI cautiously for production features; retain SRE and security disciplines.
  • Zeno’s vision: a mixed IDE/canvas for backend creation combining code, a DSL (Xenoscript), visual tooling and AI assistance—an accessible middle layer between cloud consoles and raw infra tooling.

Key takeaways / insights

  • "Writing checks your backend can’t cache" — frontends frequently assume backend capabilities (latency, scale, caching) they don’t have.
  • Componentize UIs: design and cache atomic units (cards, widgets) rather than entire ephemeral pages.
  • Make API contracts and specs central: discovery, ordering, and intent must be explicit for agents/frontend generators to use APIs correctly.
  • Frontend vs backend risk: frontend failures are brand/UX risks; backend failures are data/security risks — both require different controls.
  • AI is powerful but not yet trustworthy as an autonomous producer of production backends; supervision, inspectability and ownership are essential.

Notable quotes

  • “It isn’t enough to present them something and then have them waiting around.”
  • “If you don’t understand it, you don’t own it.”
  • “Front end engineers need to have a pretty intimate understanding … of how the backend works.”

Practical recommendations / action items

For frontend developers:

  • Learn backend fundamentals: caching, indexing, request lifecycle, rate limits and what your APIs can realistically serve.
  • Work component‑first: identify atomic units of business value you can cache or render quickly.
  • Collaborate early with backend engineers to align on API contracts and performance SLAs.

For backend engineers / architects:

  • Make specs (OpenAPI/Swagger/SDKs) first‑class; design APIs for agent consumption and prioritization.
  • Consider richer API shapes than basic CRUD to convey context and limit scope of data returned.
  • Improve observability to handle agent‑driven or dynamically generated traffic patterns.

For engineering leaders:

  • Use AI for prototypes and internal tooling; restrict production use until outputs are auditable and reliable.
  • Prefer senior engineers to lead AI co‑creation; require juniors to continue hands‑on coding for skill development.
  • Maintain SRE/security processes: code reviews, tests, audits, and governance before shipping AI‑generated artifacts.

For product teams:

  • Design UX that sets correct expectations for latency (progressive disclosure, “thinking longer” patterns).
  • Prioritize modular UX that degrades gracefully when downstream services are slow.

Tools & approaches mentioned

  • Xano: example low‑code backend tool useful for frontend engineers to learn backend primitives.
  • Spec‑driven design, SDKs, OpenAPI/Swagger.
  • Zeno: mixed IDE vision combining code, DSL (Xenoscript), visual canvas and AI assistance.

Bonus

  • Stellar Answer shoutout: Bruno Brunowski — answer on parsing command line arguments in bash (saved by 100 users).

If you want the short practical summary: componentize the frontend, make API intent explicit via specs, treat AI‑generated code with governance and ownership, and invest in observability and orchestration so your backend can reliably serve the new wave of dynamic, agentic frontends.