Say One Nice Thing … About the East’s Tanktastic Bottom Five. Plus, UConn Shocks the World (Again)! | Group Chat

Summary of Say One Nice Thing … About the East’s Tanktastic Bottom Five. Plus, UConn Shocks the World (Again)! | Group Chat

by The Ringer

1h 25m•March 30, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of Say One Nice Thing … About the East’s Tanktastic Bottom Five. Plus, UConn Shocks the World (Again)! | Group Chat

This Group Chat episode (The Ringer) opens on a long, exuberant breakdown of UConn’s dramatic win over Duke — a 19-point comeback finished by a near-impossible buzzer-beating three — then pivots to the show’s recurring “Say One Nice Thing” segment where the hosts try to find at least one compliment for five of the Eastern Conference’s worst teams (Pacers, Wizards, Nets, Bucks, Bulls). The conversation mixes game-reaction heat, draft prospect scouting, tanking strategy, and roster/organizational takes — with tangents about team culture, coaching, and one host’s home projects.

Key moments & big takeaways

  • UConn vs. Duke reaction

    • Hosts call the finish “one of the greatest sports moments” they’ve seen: UConn erased a 19-point deficit, and a deep buzzer-beating three (off a scramble and last-moment possession) beat Duke.
    • Key sequence elements mentioned: a late deep three by “Caravan” (narration mismatch in transcript), a missed one-and-one free throw earlier, a chaotic throw-up turnover by a Boozer, then the final shot by “Mullins.”
    • Dan Hurley’s post-win celebration included him rubbing his head against a referee — the hosts called the ref the unsung hero for not retaliating and blew up the moment as “psychotic” in a comedic way.
    • Prospect discussion tied to the game: Mullins (movement shooter, size/shoulder concerns, inconsistency), Alex Caravan (veteran leader; many tournament wins), Cam Boozer (allied to an old-school four profile), and Illinois’ Wagler (promising moves/escape package).

  • Tanking and draft implications

    • Hosts discussed how teams are leaning into (or botching) tanking; some franchises are “experts at being bad” — this is increasingly strategic because of evolving league rules and protections.
    • The draft and roster-development choices (who gets targeted, which college prospects translate) are central to whether a tank actually yields a meaningful step forward.

Draft prospects and prospect notes (as discussed)

  • “Mullins”

    • Movement shooter profile (compared to Joe Harris / JJ Redick archetypes).
    • Pro concerns: narrow shoulders, limited ability to absorb contact, struggles as an on-ball creator under pressure, inconsistent make rate.
    • Big decision ahead (testing draft, NIL influences, potential to raise stock with a strong offseason).

  • “Caravan” (veteran UConn guard)

    • Praised for calm and leadership in clutch moments; long tenure and tournament experience make him a steady veteran presence.

  • “Cam” (Cam Boozer)

    • Viewed as a smart, physical, old-school four; possibly limited mobility in NBA space but can bully smaller defenders, play with high IQ, and could evolve into a stretch option.

  • Other draft names touched on (transcript spellings vary):

    • Wagler — high-level escape moves/stepbacks, could tighten handle for big upside.
    • Caleb Wilson, Milan Momkilovich (movement-shooter comparisons), and others were briefly mentioned as players to track.

“Say One Nice Thing” — East’s bottom five (summary of hosts’ one-thing-positive for each)

For each team the hosts tried to highlight at least one promising or redeeming feature amid dismal records or tanking behavior.

  • Indiana Pacers

    • Problem: Deep losing stretch since the deadline; evidence of active tanking.
    • One nice thing: There’s a remaining, quiet competitiveness and some roster building blocks. The Pacers discovered useful lineups (e.g., Pascal Siakam at the five in some lineups), they have rotation/bench pieces (Kobe Brown, Jairus Walker) who could be real contributors, and Siakam’s effort/versatility is a plus.

  • Washington Wizards

    • Problem: Seasonal mess, roster uncertainty.
    • One nice thing: Will (Will Riley in transcript) has emerged — he’s shot well, handled pick-and-roll reps, and filled an important wing role. The Wizards could have a clearer wing role next year that plugs into a future traction plan around star(s).

  • Brooklyn Nets

    • Problem: Tanking, poor draft clarity, wildly mixed rookie class results.
    • One nice thing(s):
      • Young players have flashed — the hosts singled out “Ben Saroff”/Ben Sarr (transcript) as an intriguing young piece with downhill tendencies and flashes of playmaking.
      • Claxton + Michael Porter Jr. chemistry: Claxton’s playmaking and Porter’s off-ball finishing produced efficient looks; that pairing could be a short-term, productive core if the roster is right.

  • Milwaukee Bucks

    • Problem: Giannis health/availability mess, coaching friction (Doc Rivers), organizational chaos.
    • One nice thing: The roster can legitimately shoot — multiple rotation players are hitting threes at high rates (AJ Green, Torian Prince, Bobby Portis, Miles Turner, others). If Giannis were healthy and sustained, that shooting base would make Milwaukee deadly; as-is it’s a tantalizing but underleveraged strength.

  • Chicago Bulls

    • Problem: Missed tanking window, front office/trade skepticism; middling draft odds.
    • One nice thing: Leonard Miller (acquired as a secondary piece of a previous trade) is a promising lengthy forward who fits Chicago’s ball-movement offense and could be an actual rotation contributor; and certain younger pieces (transcript refers to “Bezalus” and “Giddy”) show incremental improvements.

Note: the hosts emphasized context — many “nice things” are conditional (development, health, roster construction or trade moves).

Notable quotes & lines

  • “I have the energy of a champion” — Justin, on wearing his UConn hat.
  • “The ref is the real hero for not teeing up Dan Hurley.”
  • “We are experts at being shitty” — on teams that have mastered tanking.
  • “There is no deserving in life.” — Rob, on who ‘deserves’ lottery picks.
  • “The audacity to commit to the bit” — hosts on teams leaning into long, public tank campaigns.

Tactical recommendations & what to watch next

  • Short-term watching:

    • UConn’s Final Four matchup with Illinois (how their guard depth & defense play together vs. Illinois’ wing creators).
    • Prospects to monitor: Mullins, Caravan, Wagler, and the Nets’ rookies (Ben Saroff, Yegor, Geoman in the transcript), plus Claxton–MPJ on-court chemistry.

  • For the front offices (hosts’ implicit advice)

    • Pacers: keep experimenting with Pascal at the five and preserve minutes for promising bench pieces (Kobe Brown).
    • Wizards: develop and expand role for Will Riley as a wing with playmaking/shooting upside.
    • Nets: clarify draft identity (too many young projects; needs clearer plan), consider acquiring a ready-made young piece (Darren Peterson name raised as an ideal target).
    • Bucks: decide sooner than later on Giannis (extension vs. trade) and stabilize coaching/communication.
    • Bulls: double down on developmental fits (Leonard Miller) and scout to find the next incremental contributor rather than chasing splashy “fixes.”

Episode housekeeping & tone

  • Heavy ad reads sprinkled throughout (Home Depot, Carvana, Men’s Warehouse, ZetBound, Chevy, Two Good Creamers, Shane Company).
  • Hosts include Justin Verrier, Rob Mahoney, and J. Kyle (plus production/other contributors).
  • Style: conversational, high-energy, often sarcastic and jokey; leans hard on fan-affective reaction (especially regarding UConn) and on inside-baseball draft/prospect chat.

If you want a one-line elevator: this episode is half ecstatic UConn reaction (historic buzzer-beater + chaos), half contrarian tank-defense — the hosts try to find one redeeming detail in five losing Eastern teams and break down which prospects and roster pivots could (theoretically) change their fortunes.