Can Denver Get on OKC’s Level? Plus, Two Amuse-Bouche Trades, and the Most Intriguing Teams at the Deadline.

Summary of Can Denver Get on OKC’s Level? Plus, Two Amuse-Bouche Trades, and the Most Intriguing Teams at the Deadline.

by The Ringer

1h 22mFebruary 2, 2026

Overview of Can Denver Get on OKC’s Level? Plus, Two Amuse-Bouche Trades, and the Most Intriguing Teams at the Deadline

This Ringer Group Chat episode (hosts Justin Verrier, Rob Mahoney, and Kyle) breaks down a juicy NBA slate and the trade-deadline landscape ahead of Thursday’s deadline. Main themes: a marquee Nuggets–Thunder game (what Denver’s emerging pieces mean against OKC), two small but telling weekend trades (De’Andre Hunter and Vít Krejčí), and a tour of the most intriguing teams/decision points heading into the deadline (Warriors, Pistons, Timberwolves, Blazers, Cavs, Thunder).

Game recap: Nuggets vs. Thunder — what mattered

  • Final impression: OKC blew Denver open in the third quarter by raining threes; when OKC’s shots fall they’re almost unbeatable.
  • Standouts:
    • Kaysan/Kasen Wallace (OKC): career-high threes (7) and strong defensive impact — when he shoots like that OKC is lethal.
    • Peyton Watson (Denver): breakout, 29-point type performance; has added reliable shooting to his athleticism and looks like a legitimate rotation/role star.
    • Nikola Jokić: back from a 16-game absence — a mixed return. Showed flashes but still finding conditioning/minutes; Denver will manage him carefully.
    • Jamal Murray: named an All-Star (host discussion about how such accolades matter in retrospect).
  • X-factor notes:
    • Isaiah Hartenstein’s matchup value vs. Jokić (the “net” metaphor) — important small-ball/size option for OKC.
    • Denver’s depth issues (Gordon, Cam Johnson, Brown out) and minutes management make the lineup construction a key ongoing story.

Trades this weekend (the “amuse-bouche” deals)

  • Cavs ↔ Kings: De’Andre Hunter moved on (Cleveland traded Hunter, cleared his $25M team option/contract issues) and Cleveland got back Dennis Schröder, Dario Šarić and Keon Ellis (depth, energy, defensive wing). Takeaways:
    • Cleveland: got cheaper, energetic depth immediately useful for playoffs; reduced long-term luxury noise.
    • Sacramento: gambled on Hunter’s fit/ceiling; listeners/hosts skeptical — Hunter’s best season might be behind him, and he never quite “graduated” from prospect promise to reliable two-way piece.
    • Bigger implication: Cleveland may be quietly preparing for longer-term guard decisions (Garland durability discussed as a risk).
  • Blazers (win) — Vít Krejčí to Portland for two second-round picks + a roster/injury piece:
    • Hosts called it a steal for Portland: high-upside shooter/dribbler on a cheap 2–3 year contract who fits Portland’s spacing/shot profile.
    • Practical roster reason: Portland plans to convert two two-way spots to full roster spots and needs guard shooting/playmaking depth while they ride their rebuild and retain flexibility (and wild-talk about Giannis rumors as pure fantasy).
    • Context: deals cost low-value assets; Portland retains draft/pick flexibility.

Most intriguing teams at the deadline (who to watch and why)

Golden State Warriors

  • Status: deep cap/pick complications; Steph Curry dealing with knee soreness. Giannis trade rumors immediately dragged the Warriors into conversation.
  • Hosts’ read: Warriors have limited clear paths to a transformational deadline upgrade without mortgaging far future picks; Giannis-to-GSW perceived as improbable logistically and timeline-wise.
  • Questions: Do the Warriors sell parts (Draymond) or stand pat? Can they add a ball-handler/creator short-term without sacrificing long-term viability?

Detroit Pistons

  • Status: unexpectedly top of the East with a very young core (Jaden Ivey, Jalen Duren, Ausar Thompson, etc.).
  • Deadline dilemma: stay patient and trust internal growth or be aggressive and upgrade the bench/scoring now to exploit a rare immediate window in the East?
  • Needs: reliable offensive lift/three-point shooting off the bench (forward or guard). Possible targets discussed conceptually (swing pieces, shooters, spacing).
  • Hosts’ lean: they should be open to improving now — small-to-mid upgrades could make a big playoff difference.

Minnesota Timberwolves

  • Status: established contenders (Ant, Rudy, Julius combo) but suffering inconsistent second-unit scoring; recent skid exposed it.
  • Needs: a secondary scoring guard/wing who can create or reliable off-ball shooting; maybe a wing/big to shore up backup minutes.
  • Targets suggested (theory): Malik Monk, Sadiq Bey, Ben Mathurin, Ty Jerome, Tyus Jones — each has trade/fit pros and cons; money/picks make any deal tricky.
  • Time pressure: Wolves have pieces and limited draft capital to dangle, so trades will require creativity.

Portland Trail Blazers

  • Status: low-cost pickups (Krejčí) + major flexibility via holding valuable Bucks future picks; still a buyer/third-team in big trade scenarios.
  • Extra wrinkle: Blazers’ picks and low payroll make them an interesting partner or matcher in hypothetical superstar moves (Giannis talk = thought experiment, not realistic probability).
  • Host take: Portland continues to collect flexible, cheap assets and maintain optionality.

Cleveland Cavaliers / Oklahoma City Thunder

  • Cavs: their Hunter trade implies rethinking perimeter construction and durability around Donovan Mitchell and Darius Garland (Garland availability repeatedly questioned).
  • Thunder: more likely to stand pat — Hartenstein viewed as too valuable as a matchup and matchup-coverage piece to move at the deadline despite salary questions.

Notable quotes, metaphors & color

  • “Isaiah Hartenstein is that net for Jokic” — Hartenstein’s value is matchup-and-grind, not box-score flashy stats.
  • Peyton Watson has “graduated” from athletic curiosity to a multi-layered offensive threat — now part of Denver’s collective offensive options.
  • Trades labeled “amuse-bouche” — small, palate-opening deals hinting at bigger moves to come at the deadline.

What to watch on Thursday (trade-deadline checklist)

  • Will Golden State make a move (sell Draymond or trade future picks)? Any credible Giannis motion is improbable but a market signal.
  • Will the Pistons swing for a short-term offensive upgrade (splashy wing or shooter)?
  • Wolves: do they pursue a true second-unit scorer (e.g., Malik Monk) or try to patch internally?
  • Cavs: any further maneuvering tied to Garland’s health or Mitchell’s future?
  • Thunder: any marginal move for depth or accounting only — Hartenstein expected to stay.
  • Expect multiple small “amuse-bouche” moves; the hosts plan a Thursday afternoon pod to recap the deadline immediately after it closes.

Bottom line / takeaways

  • Denver looked both promising (Peyton Watson’s emergence) and fragile (Jokić minutes/reconditioning, limited depth). A Nuggets–Thunder series will be fascinating and different from last year.
  • Weekend trades were small but revealing: Cleveland prioritized energy/cheap depth and roster flexibility; Portland snagged a cheap shooter/playmaker in Krejčí.
  • The deadline likely offers more tinkering than blockbuster action — Golden State’s constraints and the Wolves/Pistons’ differing incentives make for a tense three-day build-up.
  • Key narrative to follow: which teams push now to capitalize on windows (Detroit) versus build patiently (Portland/Minnesota), and how injuries (Jokić, Garland, Steph) ultimately drive decisions.

Thanks to the hosts for the market color and for the Thursday-after-deadline follow-up promise — the pod’s next episode will recap whatever actually happens at the deadline.