NBA Drops Hammer on the Clippers. Plus, the Western Conference Hierarchy

Summary of NBA Drops Hammer on the Clippers. Plus, the Western Conference Hierarchy

by The Ringer

1h 49m•September 4, 2026

Overview of NBA Drops Hammer on the Clippers. Plus, the Western Conference Hierarchy

This episode of The Ringer NBA Show splits into two big chunks: a deep reaction to the NBA’s punishment of the Clippers over the Kawhi Leonard/uncle Dennis/Lawrence Frank/Steve Ballmer saga, and a full tier-by-tier ranking of the Western Conference. The tone is equal parts serious and sarcastic — especially when the hosts dissect how brazen the Clippers’ alleged wrongdoing looks in the league report — before shifting into a long offseason outlook for every Western team.

NBA Discipline on the Clippers

The punishment and the report

  • The NBA’s report was described as devastating for the Clippers.
  • The hosts reacted to:
    • Five first-round picks being taken away
    • A $30 million fine
    • A suspension for Steve Ballmer
    • A six-month suspension for Lawrence Frank
  • Their read was that the report suggests a coordinated effort to work around league rules tied to Kawhi Leonard’s deal and outside sponsorships.

Why it hit so hard

  • They felt the evidence made the Clippers look blatantly dishonest and exposed.
  • One major theme was how absurd it is when people lie so openly that the truth is easy to trace back.
  • They also found the report unintentionally funny in places because of the strange sponsorship details and the way the timeline unfolded.

Bigger implications

  • The Clippers were framed as crippled long-term, not just punished.
  • The hosts debated whether the team should simply tear everything down and restart, because the pick loss makes future team-building nearly impossible.
  • They also discussed the broader question: Was cheating ever worth it?
    • Their answer: maybe only for truly transcendent players like prime LeBron, Wembanyama, Jokic, or Curry.
  • A key takeaway was that this kind of scandal can cost a team not just assets, but also future fans, trust, and franchise equity.

Western Conference Hierarchy

Western Conference rankings at a glance

RankTeamMain reasoning
15KingsWorst defense in the West, no clear direction, bleak long-term outlook
14MavericksLots of talent but major fit/injury questions and shaky point-guard depth
13GrizzliesFun reset team with upside, but their best player is basically still developing
12ClippersPunishment and uncertainty make the future look disastrous
11Trail BlazersVibes are bad, roster fit is awkward, and the direction is unclear
10WarriorsStill dangerous because of Steph, but old, fragile, and limited
9PelicansTalented but messy, with major health and lineup-fit concerns
8SunsHard-playing, feisty team, but likely to regress defensively
7TimberwolvesHuge disagreement between the hosts; talent is there, but fit/size/role questions remain
6JazzOne of the most intriguing young teams, especially on offense
5LakersLuka-centered offense makes them dangerous if the pieces fit and stay healthy
4NuggetsStill elite because of Jokic, but the bench and offseason moves were viewed as underwhelming
3RocketsPhysical, talented, and improved by continuity and veteran force multipliers
2ThunderReigning powerhouse: elite defense, elite top-end talent, deep rotation
1SpursWembanyama-driven upside and internal growth made them the hosts’ top team

Team-by-Team Takeaways

Bottom tier: Kings, Mavericks, Grizzlies, Clippers

  • Kings: Essentially a “relegate them now” team in the hosts’ eyes. Bad defense, questionable coaching, and little optimism.
  • Mavericks: Promising pieces, but the team still feels incomplete and injury-prone.
  • Grizzlies: A reset around young talent makes them fun, but they’re still largely projecting rather than proven.
  • Clippers: The scandal overshadows everything; even before the punishment, the roster looked unstable.

Middle tier: Blazers, Warriors, Pelicans, Suns, Timberwolves

  • Blazers: The hosts focused heavily on bad vibes, poor roster logic, and uncertainty about guard roles.
  • Warriors: Steph Curry keeps them afloat, but age, injuries, and minimal offseason improvement make them hard to trust.
  • Pelicans: More structure at point guard and some coaching optimism, but the fit around Zion remains fragile.
  • Suns: A hard-playing team that surprised one host last year, though defensive luck may not repeat.
  • Timberwolves: The biggest debate of the segment — one host loved the talent, while the other worried about fit and consistency.

Upper tier: Jazz, Lakers, Nuggets, Rockets, Thunder, Spurs

  • Jazz: Loved as an offensive team with upside; one host was particularly high on their future and rookie impact.
  • Lakers: Luka Dončić was the central reason for optimism. The idea was that a Luka-led team can become elite offensively almost by default.
  • Nuggets: Still extremely dangerous because of Nikola Jokić, but the offseason felt like a step backward in supporting talent.
  • Rockets: Seen as a serious contender thanks to veteran stability, defensive structure, and improved shooting support.
  • Thunder: Consensus elite team, even after losing some useful depth pieces.
  • Spurs: The clear No. 1 for one host, with Wembanyama’s ceiling driving everything.

Notable Insights

  • The West feels top-heavy but still unstable, with a few true contenders and a large middle class of teams that are interesting but flawed.
  • The hosts repeatedly returned to the idea that fit matters as much as talent, especially for teams like Dallas, Minnesota, and Portland.
  • Their strongest single star-based argument was simple: if you have Wembanyama or Jokić, your ceiling is enormous.
  • Their most important structural point: teams with no direction or no defensive identity are stuck, while the best teams have either a transcendent star, elite defense, or both.

Tone and Format Notes

  • The episode includes a recurring playful bit where each team gets a Beatles song.
  • The Clippers segment was especially animated, sarcastic, and legal-drama-heavy.
  • The Western Conference discussion was more measured, but still highly opinionated and full of sharp roster-fit analysis.