What Happened To The Vegan Movement? Rich & Simon Hill On The Rise & Fall Of Plant-Based Eating

Summary of What Happened To The Vegan Movement? Rich & Simon Hill On The Rise & Fall Of Plant-Based Eating

by Rich Roll

1h 16mJune 29, 2026

Overview of What Happened To The Vegan Movement? Rich & Simon Hill On The Rise & Fall Of Plant-Based Eating

Rich Roll and nutrition scientist Simon Hill unpack why the vegan/plant-based movement lost momentum after peaking culturally around 2020. Their core argument is that the science supporting whole-food, plant-predominant diets has not gone away—but the movement suffered from a mix of overhyped product marketing, overly absolutist health claims, poor communication, cultural backlash, and a shift toward more aggressive carnivore/anti-“woke” narratives. The episode ultimately makes the case for a more honest, nuanced, and sustainable way of advocating for plant-forward eating.

Why the Movement Lost Steam

1) Overhyped plant-based meat and dairy alternatives

  • Companies like Beyond Meat, Impossible Foods, and Oatly rode a wave of hype, but many products failed to deliver on:
    • Taste
    • Price
    • Health expectations
  • As grocery budgets tightened and inflation rose, products that were 2–3x more expensive than animal-based options became harder to justify.
  • The category also got caught in the broader backlash against ultra-processed foods.

2) The health message was often overstated

  • A major point of agreement: many people were sold plant-based foods as if they were inherently “healthy,” when many were actually highly processed.
  • That created a trust problem.
  • The hosts argue that people felt misled when the public health message blurred together:
    • ethical veganism
    • environmentalism
    • and actual nutrition science

3) Culture shifted hard in the opposite direction

  • Post-2020, there was a strong backlash against “wokeness,” and veganism got lumped into that broader cultural bucket.
  • Online and in media spaces, “plant-based” became associated with being soft, overly moralistic, or politically aligned.
  • At the same time, carnivore, high-meat, and masculinity-coded diets gained traction.

What They Think Went Wrong in Messaging

Absolutism backfired

  • A recurring theme is that the movement relied too heavily on claims like:
    • “protein isn’t a concern”
    • “you don’t need to worry about B12”
    • “all animal foods are poison”
  • Rich and Simon argue that these kinds of blanket statements may energize a movement in the short term, but they damage credibility over time.

“Vegan” became a purity test

  • They criticize the tendency toward:
    • shaming
    • moral superiority
    • “vegan on vegan crime”
    • rigid all-or-nothing thinking
  • Their view: this alienates people who might otherwise be open to eating more plants.

Good intentions don’t excuse bad communication

  • The hosts acknowledge that many advocates were motivated by animal welfare or environmental concerns.
  • But they argue that using health claims as a “Trojan horse” for ethical messaging eroded public trust.
  • Their preferred model is honesty with nuance, not simplifying away complexity.

The Science Still Supports Plant-Predominant Eating

The evidence hasn’t shifted

  • Both hosts emphasize that the underlying nutrition science remains strong:
    • Plant-predominant diets are associated with better long-term health outcomes.
    • The best diets tend to be high in fiber and minimally processed.
  • But they stress that many dietary patterns can be healthy:
    • Mediterranean
    • DASH
    • MIND
    • vegetarian
    • vegan
    • pescatarian

The real issue is food quality

  • The healthiest version of plant-based eating is not burger patties and dairy-free cookies.
  • It’s foods closer to their natural state:
    • beans
    • lentils
    • tofu
    • tempeh
    • chickpeas
    • whole grains
    • vegetables
    • fruits
    • nuts and seeds

Protein, Supplements, and Practical Nutrition

Protein needs more honesty

  • They reject the idea that protein “just takes care of itself” for everyone.
  • For some people, especially active people who eat enough total calories, it may be fine.
  • But for others, a plant-based diet can underdeliver on protein if they don’t deliberately replace animal foods well.

Key nutrients to watch

  • They specifically mention:
    • B12
    • omega-3s
    • iodine
    • zinc
    • potentially others depending on the person’s diet

Practical supplement advice

  • Simon recommends that many people starting out consider:
    • a multivitamin
    • a DHA/EPA supplement
  • For active people, he suggests aiming roughly for:
    • 1.2 g protein/kg body weight as a baseline
    • 1.6 g/kg if very physically active

Veganism, Masculinity, and the “Soy Boy” Narrative

Meat became a symbol, not just food

  • The episode spends significant time on how meat got tied to masculinity, strength, and leadership.
  • The hosts argue this is a cultural construct, not a nutritional truth.
  • They note the irony that “red-pilled” thinkers claim to resist propaganda, while often repeating meat-industry messaging.

Real strength is behavioral, not dietary

  • Their definition of masculinity focuses on:
    • integrity
    • emotional capacity
    • protectiveness
    • discipline
    • willingness to do hard things
  • They argue that being a man isn’t about eating steak; it’s about living according to values and being able to show up for others.

A Better Way to Advocate

“Attraction rather than promotion”

  • One of the strongest practical ideas in the conversation is to model the lifestyle instead of preaching it.
  • Rather than scolding people or demanding purity:
    • make the diet appealing
    • be a positive example
    • respect people’s autonomy
    • meet people where they are

Focus on addition, not elimination

  • A more effective entry point, they suggest, is to encourage people to add more plants rather than immediately demand full veganism.
  • That can mean:
    • meatless Mondays
    • swapping in legumes
    • reducing ultra-processed foods
    • moving toward a plant-predominant pattern gradually

Main Takeaways

  • The science for whole-food, plant-forward eating remains strong.
  • The movement lost credibility because it often oversold processed vegan products and made absolute claims it couldn’t fully support.
  • Cultural backlash and the rise of carnivore/macho messaging intensified the decline.
  • The most persuasive message is not “be perfect vegan,” but:
    • eat more real food
    • mostly plants
    • not too much
    • and be honest about tradeoffs
  • The episode argues for nuance, humility, and trust as the foundation for any sustainable nutrition movement.

Practical Starting Point

If someone wants to eat more plant-based without overcomplicating it, the hosts’ advice is essentially:

  • Base meals around:
    • beans
    • lentils
    • tofu
    • tempeh
    • chickpeas
    • whole grains
    • fruits and vegetables
  • Don’t ignore:
    • protein
    • B12
    • omega-3s
  • Consider:
    • a multivitamin
    • DHA/EPA supplementation
  • Aim for a pattern that is:
    • healthy
    • sustainable
    • aligned with your values
    • realistic for your life

Closing Perspective

The episode is less a eulogy for veganism than a reset. Rich and Simon’s position is that plant-based eating doesn’t need hype, moralizing, or absolutism to be worthwhile. It needs honesty, practical guidance, and a broader tent—because the goal isn’t winning arguments, but helping more people eat better for their health, the planet, and animals.