Splits in the Maga movement

Summary of Splits in the Maga movement

by Financial Times

24m•December 4, 2025
Listen to Episode

Overview of Splits in the MAGA movement

This episode of the Rachman Review (Financial Times), hosted by Gideon Rachman, features Jacob Heilbrunn (editor, The National Interest) discussing growing fractures inside the MAGA/Trump coalition. The conversation focuses on three intertwined fault lines: the Tucker Carlson–Nick Fuentes controversy and the rise of explicit anti‑Semitism among younger conservatives; a shifting Republican posture toward Israel and foreign policy; and the political fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein files. Heilbrunn argues these developments reveal both institutional realignments (e.g., at the Heritage Foundation) and political stress points that could affect Trump’s grip on the GOP.

Key issues splitting the MAGA movement

1) Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes

  • Carlson gave platform time to Nick Fuentes, a public white nationalist and anti‑Semite, provoking outrage.
  • Carlson’s tactic: provocative guests drive ratings and open alternative narratives to mainstream accounts; also reflects his break with neoconservative orthodoxies.
  • Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts defended Carlson, illustrating how influential conservative institutions have been reshaped to be more Trump‑aligned and tolerant of “no enemies to the right” behavior.

2) Anti‑Semitism and the GOP’s generational shift

  • Politico reporting revealed young Republicans exchanging Holocaust jokes and anti‑Semitic messages; J.D. Vance downplayed these as “youthful excess.”
  • Heilbrunn stresses that anti‑Semitic currents are not purely new but a resurfacing of older strains in the American right (examples cited: Patrick Buchanan, earlier National Review positions).
  • A younger cohort within the GOP is increasingly hostile to perceived Israeli influence on U.S. policy — a position that overlaps with some left‑wing critiques and fuels tolerance for figures like Fuentes.

3) Republican relationship with Israel and foreign policy

  • Carlson and a younger “America First” wing argue for treating Israel as any other ally — rejecting the bipartisan post‑1980s pro‑Israel consensus that mixed neoconservatives and evangelical support.
  • This shift risks breaking a long‑standing Republican coalition pillar (neocon/evangelical pro‑Israel alignment) and is creating internal battles with neoconservative-leaning conservatives worried about being pushed out.

4) Jeffrey Epstein files and wider conspiracies

  • Congressional moves to release Epstein-related documents have embarrassed and pressured the Trump circle.
  • Heilbrunn suggests something in the files is politically dangerous for Trump (or at least he behaves as if it is), and that the attempt to block release has heightened suspicion.
  • Conspiracy theories link Epstein, Israel, and various conservative influencers; these conspiracies further radicalize and fracture the movement.

Key actors and institutional dynamics

  • Donald Trump: reluctant to repudiate hardcore white‑nationalist elements because they are critical to his rural base and electoral coalition; prefers keeping options open rather than alienating core supporters.
  • Tucker Carlson: seen as a potential presidential contender by some; represents a media figure who has pivoted from neocon circles (Weekly Standard) to anti‑establishment, America‑First messaging.
  • Nick Fuentes: extremist figure whose explicit praise of Hitler and Holocaust denigration make him toxic to establishment conservatives.
  • Kevin Roberts / Heritage Foundation: under Roberts, Heritage has been reoriented toward Trumpist policies, defending or tolerating controversial figures as part of a broader conservative realignment.
  • J.D. Vance and other Republican politicians: attempting to balance courting the base while managing establishment and Jewish‑friendly elements of the party.

Notable insights & quotes

  • “He is, in essence, the anti‑Reagan” — describing Trump’s repudiation of Reagan‑era internationalist Republicanism.
  • Heilbrunn: Carlson “repudiated” his Weekly Standard/neocon origins and is pushing a younger conservative agenda skeptical of Israel and neoconservative globalism.
  • Observation: “All bets are off now” — on who can be a viable presidential candidate in the current political environment (media figures, outsiders).

Political implications and likely trajectories

  • Short term: Trump retains incentive to avoid alienating the hard‑right base; GOP leadership is likely to continue a delicate balancing act rather than clear repudiation of extremists.
  • Medium term:
    • The GOP’s pro‑Israel consensus could erode if young conservatives and influential media figures continue to push anti‑Israel narratives.
    • Institutional shifts (Heritage Foundation and allied outlets) may normalize previously marginal positions.
    • Tucker Carlson or similar media personalities could plausibly challenge for nomination; nothing is taboo anymore in U.S. electoral politics.
  • Epstein files: If released, they could cause reputational damage and political fallout; if suppressed, they will fuel further conspiracy theories and distrust.

Bottom line / Takeaways

  • The MAGA coalition is experiencing substantive internal strains across cultural, ideological and foreign‑policy lines.
  • The split is driven by generational shifts, media‑driven radicalization, institutional realignment within conservative organizations, and an inability (or unwillingness) by Trump and many GOP leaders to clearly repudiate extremist elements.
  • These tensions could reshape Republican orthodoxy on Israel and foreign policy and create electoral and governance risks for the party — but whether they produce immediate rupture or a managed re‑composition of the coalition remains uncertain.

Closing note

The episode also includes brief promotional plugs for other FT podcasts (The Next Five) and is framed as part of ongoing coverage of U.S. political upheaval, signaling the story will continue to evolve.