ICE Under Fire

Summary of ICE Under Fire

by Puck | Audacy

28m•January 27, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of The Powers That Be — "ICE Under Fire"

This episode of Puck's The Powers That Be (host Peter Hamby, guest Julia Yoffe) covers two linked stories: the killing of Alex Preddy by ICE in Minneapolis and the political fallout for the Trump administration, and the brief international incident over Greenland — what Trump claimed he “won” in Davos and what, in reality, he gained. The episode centers on shifting American public opinion about immigration enforcement, intra‑party pushback against aggressive ICE tactics, the power of bystander video, and how allies managed (and minimized) a foreign‑policy flareup.

Key topics discussed

  • The killing of Alex Preddy during an ICE operation in Minneapolis and related videos that circulated.
  • Public opinion shifts against ICE and the Trump administration’s immigration policies (new polling).
  • Republican and conservative criticism of some White House rhetoric and tactics.
  • The prospect of attaching enforcement‑related reforms (body cameras, agent IDs, anti‑profiling measures) to a DHS funding bill — possible government standoff.
  • The Greenland episode: Trump’s threat to buy or otherwise control Greenland, the international pushback, and the vague “deal” announced in Davos.

What happened in Minneapolis (ICE incident)

  • A widely circulated video shows an ICE agent shooting Alex Preddy (name varies in the transcript). The footage and freeze frames were decisive in driving public outrage.
  • Witness and bystander footage reportedly has been taken into custody by federal authorities; both DHS and the FBI are investigating.
  • Local and national political leaders reacted: Minneapolis’s mayor reportedly had discussions with Trump; Minnesota’s governor engaged as well.
  • Republicans — including Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and other GOP figures — publicly urged the White House to recalibrate its immigration enforcement tactics.
  • Senate Democrats threatened to link DHS funding to reforms such as body cameras for ICE agents, mandatory visible IDs, and anti‑profiling measures.

Polling & public opinion (numbers cited)

  • Echelon Insights poll highlights:
    • 56% of voters oppose ICE’s current enforcement efforts.
    • 52% believe ICE is targeting people who are not threats to public safety.
    • 45% say ICE raids make them feel less safe (a plurality).
    • 43% approve / 55% disapprove of how Trump handles immigration in this poll (showing a flip from previous years when immigration was a stronger point for Trump).
    • 58% say the U.S. is on the “wrong track.”
  • YouGov: only ~20% of people who saw the killing video believed it was justified.
  • A separate Echelon question: 67% of likely voters said Trump does NOT deserve a Nobel Peace Prize.

Analysis & main takeaways

  • The visual evidence (phone videos) is reshaping public perceptions. Repeated footage of aggressive enforcement has eroded support for ICE even among some conservative or pro‑border voters.
  • This is not just partisan backlash; some GOP figures and conservative commentators have criticized the administration’s rhetoric and labeling of protesters/ victims as “would‑be assassins.”
  • There’s a concern about federal agencies seizing footage and the lack of truly independent investigators — raising transparency questions.
  • Historical comparisons: hosts and guest liken the speed and severity of democratic erosion to early stages of authoritarian regimes, noting how quickly visuals can alter public trust.
  • The Jan. 6 parallel: media and video evidence can be powerful, but partisan media ecosystems can harden alternative narratives, reducing long‑term accountability unless enforcement keeps producing damning footage.

Greenland episode — outcome and implications

  • Trump’s public pursuit of Greenland (and implied threats: tariffs, military action) created international alarm and stirred NATO allies.
  • In Davos the administration framed a vague agreement as a win; officials later suggested the outcome looks much like existing arrangements (e.g., 1951 basing/status arrangements) with few concrete new concessions.
  • European and Nordic leaders used a combined approach — measured pushback, flattery, and small concessions — to defuse the situation while allowing Trump a face‑saving “win.”
  • Substance: likely minimal. The episode strained relations, gave geopolitical rivals (Russia, China) propaganda and diplomatic leverage, and highlighted U.S. limitations in Arctic logistics (lack of icebreakers, specialized capability).
  • Overall characterization: a political mirage — a manufactured problem followed by a manufactured (but mostly symbolic) solution that Trump can use domestically.

Notable quotes / insights

  • “It took Donald Trump a year… to have his administration gunning down U.S. citizens in the streets of an American city.” — framing the severity and speed of the current moment.
  • The power of video: repeated footage has moved public opinion, and videos are being shot by immigrant families and witnesses — not just activists.
  • On Greenland: “First you create a non‑problem and then you create a non‑solution… and then you get your political win.”

Political and practical consequences to watch

  • Potential legislative outcomes: DHS funding could be tied to oversight reforms (body cams, visible IDs, anti‑profiling rules). This could trigger a funding fight or partial government shutdown.
  • Investigations: Federal probes (DHS/FBI) into the Minneapolis killing — transparency and any released footage will be crucial politically and legally.
  • Party dynamics: Increasing GOP pushback suggests fissures within the party over tactics and messaging on immigration; this may produce short‑term recalibration.
  • Foreign policy: Allies have shown they can blunt impulsive U.S. moves while protecting their own interests — but U.S. credibility and alliance cohesion may suffer long‑term.

Suggested follow‑ups (if you want to track this)

  • Watch for official releases or court filings about the Minneapolis footage and federal investigation updates.
  • Monitor Congressional negotiations on DHS funding for amendments on ICE oversight.
  • Track additional polls to see if the shift in immigration opinion persists or re‑hardens along partisan lines.
  • Watch diplomatic statements out of NATO, Denmark/Greenland, and Nordic countries for any longer‑term arrangements about Arctic security and basing.

Bottom line

A combination of damning cell‑phone footage and overzealous enforcement tactics has turned public opinion on ICE and immigration enforcement, forcing even some conservative voices to criticize the administration. The Greenland flap ended as a symbolic political win for the White House but produced little concrete gain and raised questions about U.S. competence and alliance trust. Both stories underscore how visual evidence and savvy responses from allies and domestic political actors can rapidly shape narrative and policy pressure.