Ellison’s Earnings Call Head Fake

Summary of Ellison’s Earnings Call Head Fake

by Puck | Audacy

22m•November 13, 2025
Listen to Episode

Overview of The Powers That Be — "Ellison’s Earnings Call Head Fake"

This episode breaks down Paramount Skydance’s first public earnings call since David Ellison became CEO. Bill Cohan and host Peter Hamby analyze what Ellison emphasized (strategy and vision), what he largely avoided (detailed historical earnings discussion), how the market reacted, and what the call reveals about Paramount’s interest in acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD). The conversation focuses on management’s guidance, cost-cutting targets, M&A posture, and the likely scenarios ahead.

Key takeaways

  • Management guided to roughly $30 billion in revenue and about $3.5 billion of adjusted EBITDA for the coming year (implying ~10–12% EBITDA margin).
  • Paramount Skydance raised its cost‑cut target from $2 billion to at least $3 billion — a major focus of the call.
  • David Ellison avoided dwelling on historical earnings and instead delivered a strategy-heavy, corporate‑language presentation built around three “North Star” priorities: cost discipline, profitable streaming, and growth via creative storytelling.
  • The stock jumped ~10% after the call — likely driven by the aggressive cost‑takeout messaging and a renewed sense of strategic direction.
  • The WBD sale/auction remains central. Ellison signaled interest but also played coy, suggesting Paramount can “buy versus build” and that WBD would help hit their goals — while downplaying any urgency.

What happened on the earnings call

  • Minimal discussion of past quarterly financials; management framed this as understandable because the leadership change happened recently.
  • Forward guidance was highlighted (see Key takeaways) but little detail was given on near-term results or granular line items.
  • Ellison emphasized three corporate priorities — cost cutting, making streaming profitable, and growing via creative/production strengths — repeatedly in polished corporate language.
  • The company increased its announced cost-savings ambition to at least $3 billion, up from $2 billion previously discussed.

Ellison’s “North Star” priorities (as presented)

  • Cost reduction: scale up cost takeouts to at least $3 billion.
  • Streaming profitability: make streaming “very profitable” (operational focus rather than subscriber growth).
  • Creative anchor: grow business centered on “creative engines” and storytelling.

Market reaction and why shares moved

  • Shares rose roughly 10% after the call.
  • Most likely drivers:
    • The larger cost‑savings target (investors reward visible margin improvement).
    • A confident strategic posture from management that suggested a clearer path to profitability.
    • Continued positioning around the WBD opportunity (investors speculating on M&A upside).
  • Note: Guidance for EBITDA was reduced from earlier internal goals in some timelines, but the market seemed focused on cost discipline and strategic direction.

Paramount and the WBD (Warner Bros. Discovery) angle

  • Background: Paramount Skydance has made multiple (reported) offers for WBD that were rejected; WBD has announced a split/spin plan and is running a process.
  • Scale problem: Paramount’s market cap ($18B) is far smaller than WBD’s ($57B market cap + ~$30B debt), meaning a full takeover would require substantial outside capital (Larry Ellison and partners).
  • Strategic posture:
    • Ellison publicly suggested Paramount can “buy versus build” and repeatedly framed any WBD deal through his North Star objectives.
    • The conversation now resembles a cat‑and‑mouse auction phase: Paramount courting the asset, WBD soliciting interest, and other bidders (or piece buyers) possible.
  • Timeline and scenarios:
    • A full sale to Paramount could be pursued via a hostile/direct-to-shareholder push (bear-hug/hostile bid), but that requires big capital commitment and is politically/operationally complex.
    • WBD’s preferred path appears to be the announced split (spin) by April; spinning could create saleable pieces that attract different buyers and possibly unlock higher per‑share value.
    • Ellison’s team is publicly projecting indifference to whether they land WBD, but the rhetoric also telegraphs genuine interest if the price/structure fits.

Implications and likely outcomes

  • Short term: Expect continued market volatility around any WBD process updates (data room activity, buyer interest, timeline changes).
  • If Paramount pursues WBD aggressively (hostile/direct-to-shareholders), the timeline could accelerate — but that is uncertain and expensive.
  • If WBD proceeds with the split, buyers may pursue pieces rather than the whole, potentially producing greater aggregate value than a single acquirer paying for the full company.
  • For investors: cost cuts and clearer profitability targets are positive signals, but execution risk is meaningful. M&A upside depends on capital commitments and regulatory/operational hurdles.

Notable quotes from the call

  • “How do we maximize value for our shareholders?” — paraphrase of Ellison’s corporate framing.
  • “No must‑haves for us…buy versus build.” — Ellison signaling flexibility on M&A vs internal growth.
  • Repeated references to “North Star principles” (cost savings, profitable streaming, creative growth).

What to watch next (actionable signals)

  • Confirmations of the $3 billion+ cost‑savings program: specifics, timing, and realized run-rate effects.
  • Any escalation in bidding tactics for WBD (formal hostile steps, bear‑hug letters, shareholder solicitation).
  • WBD’s execution of its split/spin timeline and which assets are carved out — who bids on which pieces.
  • Further guidance updates on revenue/EBITDA and streaming profitability metrics.
  • Statements or commitments from Larry Ellison or financing partners about capital backing for a large acquisition.

Bottom line

Ellison used the call to reposition Paramount Skydance as a cost‑focused, profit‑oriented buyer with appetite for strategic M&A — while downplaying historical earnings. Investors cheered the bigger cost‑cut target and clearer strategic priorities. The biggest macro question — whether Paramount can or will acquire Warner Bros. Discovery — remains unresolved and hinges on financing, timing, and WBD’s split strategy.