With the Podcast “I’ve Had It,” Jennifer Welch Goes “Dark Woke” on Politics

Summary of With the Podcast “I’ve Had It,” Jennifer Welch Goes “Dark Woke” on Politics

by The New Yorker

32mJanuary 19, 2026

Overview of I've Had It (Jennifer Welch)

This New Yorker Radio Hour interview with Jennifer Welch, co-host of the political podcast I've Had It, profiles her rise from interior designer and reality-TV personality to a leading, confrontational left-leaning podcaster. Welch describes the show’s evolution from airing everyday grievances to a blunt, populist, and profanity-laced politics she calls “dark woke”: a version of progressive politics that fights for equality but embraces ruthless, in-your-face tactics. The conversation covers her background, the podcast’s style and audience, critiques of mainstream media and centrist Democrats, positions on culture-war topics and foreign policy, and how podcasts fit into today’s media ecosystem.

Key points and main takeaways

  • Origin and format
    • Welch launched I've Had It after reality-TV exposure and an interior-design career; the podcast started with relatable riffs on everyday annoyances and moved toward pointed political commentary.
    • They also run “IHIP News” (I've Had It Podcast News) to cover politics more directly.
  • Style and positioning
    • Describes the show as cathartic, intimate, profane, and intentionally provocative—appealing to listeners who feel alienated by both coastal elites and corporate media.
    • Coined term “dark woke”: fighting for social justice but willing to use harsh rhetoric and tactical ruthlessness.
  • Audience and reach
    • Large, engaged audience including many in “middle America” and blue dots within red states; Welch reports listeners in places like Oklahoma.
  • Critique of media and centrism
    • Argues decline of traditional journalism and an overstructured Democratic media ecosystem; says corporate media and corporate Democrats have created a vacuum that fuels anti-establishment sentiment.
    • Calls for Democrats to meet voters where they are (e.g., appear on popular podcasts like Joe Rogan) and to adopt more candid, populist messaging.
  • Political judgments
    • Tough on both parties: calls out MAGA rhetoric and what she sees as toxic masculinity, while sharply criticizing establishment Democrats (e.g., Cory Booker, Rahm Emanuel, Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer) for duplicity or prioritizing corporate interests.
    • Asserts the need to name atrocities honestly (e.g., willingness to call leaders war criminals) and holds potential Democratic leaders to those standards.
  • Community and emotional framing
    • Compares the show’s function to Al‑Anon: a place for people to feel heard, validated, and less isolated amid political gaslighting and trauma.

Topics discussed

  • Welch’s personal background: Oklahoma upbringing by politically progressive, atheist parents; reality TV to podcast pivot.
  • Evolution of I've Had It: from “petty grievances” to frank political commentary and IHIP News.
  • “Dark woke” explained: progressive goals + unapologetic tactics.
  • Media landscape: decline of traditional news audiences, rise of podcasts and social media as primary info sources.
  • Role of personalities like Joe Rogan: platforms that feel intimate and less formal.
  • Critique of Democratic establishment: centrist/corporate Democrats vs. populist left.
  • Culture-war flashpoints: transgender issues, “wokeness” backlash, the “wine mom” label, and how those narratives affect politics.
  • Foreign policy and accountability: willingness to label state actors as war criminals and critique U.S. actions historically.
  • Electoral strategy and candidates: interest in economic populists (mentions admiration for Ro Khanna, conditional support for J.B. Pritzker, skepticism about the Democratic establishment’s fit with base priorities); views on Gavin Newsom.

Notable quotes and insights

  • “This is the era of FU politics and dark woke.”
  • “We are fighting for good and for equality and for social justice for everybody, but we don't mind saying F you.”
  • Podcasts feel intimate—“you know them and they're right in your ear”—which is why they are influential now.
  • “We’re being gaslit and propagandized”—the podcast as a community to resist that feeling.
  • Self-reflection: “I was a very good MSNBC liberal... I see the error of my thinking.”

Controversies and criticisms addressed

  • Confrontational interviews: Welsh recounts contentious exchanges with figures such as Cory Booker and Rahm Emanuel; she defends blunt questioning (e.g., yes/no on Netanyahu).
  • Public labeling and tone: acknowledges her style may alienate some conservative listeners and that she embraces that trade-off—she’s not a politician running for office.
  • Pushback on labels: rejects reductive terms like “wine mom” and points out gendered double standards in media portrayals.

Implications and recommendations (for listeners, media, and Democrats)

  • For listeners: Expect direct, emotionally candid, and populist progressive commentary—useful for those who want a sense of community and outrage validation.
  • For mainstream media and Democrats:
    • Consider more candid, populist messaging that prioritizes working-class economic concerns over corporate alignment.
    • Engage broader media ecosystems (podcasts, nontraditional platforms) to reach skeptical or disaffected voters.
    • Be willing to speak plainly on human-rights abuses and not hide behind euphemisms.
  • For podcast creators: Intimacy and conversational tone remain key differentiators versus formal news media.

Final summary

Jennifer Welch’s I've Had It represents a populist, combative strand of left‑of‑center podcasting that trades decorum for immediacy and moral clarity. Welch argues that corporate media and centrist Democrats have ceded ground, creating a space for “dark woke” politics that fights for equality while deploying ruthless rhetoric. The show’s success underscores how podcasts and social-media feeds have reshaped political information flows—making intimacy, anger, and authenticity powerful political tools.