A Member of the “Seditious Six” on Reviving the Democratic Party

Summary of A Member of the “Seditious Six” on Reviving the Democratic Party

by The New Yorker

43mMay 16, 2026

Overview of The Political Scene from The New Yorker

This episode centers on Congressman Jason Crow of Colorado, one of the so-called “Seditious Six,” and uses his background as an Army veteran and national security hawk to explore how Democrats can build a winning message for the 2026 midterms. The hosts connect Trump’s weakening political standing, economic anxiety, foreign policy, and the party’s internal identity crisis, while Crow argues that Democrats need to be more honest, more local, and more forceful about fairness, corruption, and the rule of law.

Main Topics Discussed

Trump, China, and the optics of power

  • Evan Osnos reports from Beijing on Trump’s summit with Xi Jinping.
  • The hosts note how Trump seems drawn to the pageantry and authority of authoritarian power.
  • They argue the trip may produce symbolic wins or transactional headlines, but not meaningful solutions to Americans’ economic worries.

Democrats and the 2026 midterms

  • The conversation frames Democrats as having a political opening because Trump and Republicans are vulnerable on:
    • the economy,
    • corruption,
    • unpopular foreign policy,
    • and governance instability.
  • But Democrats also face their own weaknesses:
    • unclear messaging,
    • ideological fragmentation,
    • and a persistent image problem with working-class voters.

Jason Crow’s “seditious six” background

  • Crow reflects on the video he and five other Democrats made reminding service members not to follow illegal orders.
  • He says the message was simply a restatement of military law and ethics, not a political provocation.
  • He criticizes Trump and Pete Hegseth for escalating the issue and normalizing dangerous behavior.

War powers, Iran, and congressional authority

  • Crow sharply criticizes Trump’s military actions, including strikes carried out without clear authorization.
  • He argues Congress should reassert control over war-making powers.
  • He says repeated military interventions have disproportionately burdened working-class Americans in blood and treasure.

Key Takeaways

1. Democrats need to own their failures

Crow’s most direct advice to Democrats is to admit where the party has fallen short:

  • they stopped showing up in many communities,
  • they lost trust among rural and working-class voters,
  • and they should not simply ask for support without first rebuilding credibility.

2. Winning requires empathy and locality

Crow emphasizes that Democrats should:

  • speak to people’s pain and frustration,
  • focus on district-level issues,
  • and recruit candidates who resemble their communities rather than career politicians.

3. “Fairness” is the unifying message

A recurring theme is that voters want a system that feels fair:

  • fair wages,
  • fair rules,
  • fair government,
  • and fair use of public money. Crow frames corruption as theft from ordinary Americans, not an abstract Washington scandal.

4. Democrats need strength, not just policy

Crow argues that many voters do not necessarily reject Democratic policies; they just see Democrats as:

  • weak,
  • timid,
  • and unwilling to fight. His answer is to project conviction and competence more aggressively.

5. National security and morality are linked

One of the episode’s strongest ideas is that foreign policy is not separate from domestic politics:

  • if the U.S. ignores rules abroad, it weakens moral standards at home;
  • if the government is reckless with war and public money, ordinary Americans pay the price;
  • Democrats can connect these concerns into a broader argument about decency and accountability.

Notable Insights from the Conversation

  • Crow describes his Army experience as shaping his view that soldiers must be grounded in morality and legality, even under pressure.
  • The hosts highlight that “norms” is too abstract a word unless translated into everyday questions of what is decent, normal, and acceptable.
  • Susan Glasser, Jane Mayer, and Evan Osnos also note the tension inside Democratic messaging:
    • populist anti-elite language can sound powerful,
    • but it can also clash with the party’s need to present a credible governing alternative.

Closing Takeaway

The episode argues that Democrats’ path forward is not just anti-Trump messaging. It is a broader moral and political reset: acknowledge past failures, reconnect with working-class America, defend democratic norms, and offer a clear sense of fairness and strength. Jason Crow’s appeal is that he ties those ideas together through both military credibility and lived experience.