Overview of NPR Politics Podcast: Voters Reject the Establishment in This Week’s Primaries
This NPR Politics Podcast episode covers a busy week of primary elections across six states, highlighting a continued anti-establishment mood in both parties. The hosts discuss surprising results in South Dakota and Iowa, the slow vote count and “red mirage” confusion in California, and a New Jersey race shaped by an incumbent’s undisclosed illness. The second half of the episode shifts to redistricting, where the Supreme Court’s Alabama decision signals a major change in how courts may treat race and congressional map drawing, with big implications for the 2026 House battle and beyond.
Primary Election Takeaways
Anti-incumbent sentiment is still shaping the races
- Across the primaries, voters repeatedly favored outsiders, lesser-known candidates, or candidates running against the political establishment.
- In many cases, that didn’t mean incumbents always lost — but it did mean anti-Washington energy remained strong.
South Dakota governor’s primary
- The Republican primary featured a four-way race including:
- the incumbent governor,
- the state’s at-large U.S. House member,
- the state House speaker,
- and a car salesman, Toby Doeden.
- Doeden finished first, ahead of the incumbent, sending the race to a runoff.
- The hosts caution against overreading the result because the runoff still decides the nomination.
Iowa GOP governor’s primary: Trump’s pick loses
- President Trump endorsed Randy Feenstra late in the race, but Feenstra narrowly lost to Zach Lane.
- Lane ran as an outsider, “Iowa first” candidate and was associated with the MAHA wing of the GOP.
- This was the first major Trump-backed loss of the cycle and could matter in what is expected to be a close gubernatorial race in the fall.
- The hosts note this is less about Trump’s influence fading overall and more about this specific race and candidate.
Iowa Democratic Senate primary: electability beat ideology
- Democrats chose Josh Turek, a state representative and Paralympian, over younger progressive Zach Walls.
- Turek sold himself as the more electable candidate in a conservative-leaning state and had support from the party establishment, including Chuck Schumer.
- Walls ran explicitly against the establishment, but voters ultimately favored the candidate they thought had a better chance in the general election.
California Primary and Vote Counting
Why the results are taking so long
- California uses a vote-by-mail system, and ballots can be counted if they are postmarked by Election Day and arrive later.
- Republicans tend to vote in person more often, so their totals appear first.
- That creates a “red mirage,” where early results can make Republican candidates look stronger than they really are.
What’s happening so far
- In the California governor’s race, Republican Steve Hilton is currently ahead of Democrats Javier Becerra and Tom Steyer.
- In the Los Angeles mayor’s race, incumbent Karen Bass is leading, with Spencer Pratt briefly in second, though a Democrat could still move into the second runoff spot as more ballots are counted.
- Several House races are also still being counted, especially after California’s recent redistricting changes.
Trump’s claims about a “steal”
- Trump posted that Democrats were trying to “steal” the California primaries.
- The hosts explain that this is a familiar misinformation pattern from 2020: early Republican leads are often the result of vote-counting order, not fraud.
- Officials can count ballots through June 9, so many results are still pending.
New Jersey Race to Watch
NJ-7 is shaping up as a general election battleground
- Democratic nominee Rebecca Bennett, a former Navy helicopter pilot and health care worker, won the primary.
- The race matters because incumbent Rep. Tom Kean Jr. has been absent from public view since March due to an undisclosed illness.
- The district had already been considered a competitive battleground, and Bennett now has a clearer path while Kean is out.
Redistricting and the Supreme Court
Alabama ruling marks a major shift
- The Supreme Court allowed Alabama to use a congressional map with only one majority-Black district out of seven.
- That reverses the earlier lower-court ruling, which had required a second majority-Black district because Black residents make up more than a quarter of the state’s population.
- The decision suggests a new, more permissive legal framework for maps with reduced minority representation.
Louisiana and South Carolina developments
- In Louisiana, lawmakers redrew the map after earlier litigation and eliminated one of the state’s two majority-Black districts.
- In South Carolina, an effort to redraw the maps and remove the state’s one majority-Black district failed after some Republicans resisted the plan.
The current seat math
- Republicans have now drawn maps that could favor them in 16 additional House seats.
- Democrats have drawn about 6 additional seats.
- With other changes, the net advantage is roughly +10 seats for Republicans.
- The hosts stress that this does not guarantee outcomes, but it gives Republicans a meaningful edge heading into the midterms.
Bigger Picture: What Comes Next
The redistricting arms race is likely not over
- The hosts believe this cycle may not be the end of mid-decade map drawing.
- Democrats are already talking about redrawing maps in places like Illinois and New York in 2028.
- Because Republicans moved first and Trump effectively signaled that this kind of redistricting is acceptable, neither party seems likely to “disarm” unilaterally.
What to watch in November
- The hosts say the real test will be whether these redrawn maps actually hold up in a strong year for either party.
- Some new maps, especially in places like Louisiana and Tennessee, are designed to be very safe for Republicans.
- Others, including Texas, Florida, and North Carolina, could backfire if Democrats have a strong national year.
Main Takeaways
- Voters in multiple primaries showed a continued preference for outsiders and candidates seen as less tied to the establishment.
- Trump’s influence remains strong, but not invincible — especially in races where his chosen candidate was already slipping.
- California’s slow vote count is normal and does not indicate fraud; it reflects how mail ballots are processed.
- The Supreme Court’s Alabama decision could reshape how race and district lines are treated nationally.
- Redistricting is now a high-stakes partisan arms race that could stay active through the next census.
