Penn State vs. Buffalo preview: How can the Nittany Lions improve on the ground?

Summary of Penn State vs. Buffalo preview: How can the Nittany Lions improve on the ground?

by The Nittany Dispatch: A Penn State Football Podcast

1h 1m•September 17, 2026

Overview of The Nittany Dispatch: A Penn State Football Podcast

This episode previewed Penn State’s final non-conference game against Buffalo and focused heavily on the Nittany Lions’ biggest early-season question: how to get the run game moving without sacrificing the strength of the offensive line and the overall offensive rhythm. John Sauber and Audrey Snyder also dug into quarterback leadership, defensive depth, NIL spending, and several listener questions from the live chat.

Main Takeaways

The run game is still the biggest concern

  • The hosts agreed that Penn State’s ground attack has been the main issue through two games.
  • Offensive coach comments suggested the problem is a mix of:
    • play-calling and sequencing,
    • execution,
    • trust/availability within the running back room,
    • and some players still working back into game shape.
  • They stressed that the current workload for the lead back feels unsustainable, especially once Big Ten play begins.
  • Quentin Martin Jr. remains the most talked-about upside option, but the staff appears to be prioritizing trust and consistency.
  • James Peoples was singled out as a player fans expected more from, while the group expects Buffalo to be a chance to sort out real depth behind the top backs.

The offensive line has been a bright spot

  • Both hosts said the offensive line has been better than expected, even if the run production hasn’t matched it.
  • Their view: the line is consistently winning at the point of attack, moving defenders, and avoiding many assignment errors.
  • The message was clear: the line has done enough to justify better results from the backs.

The quarterback has been better than advertised

  • A major theme was how well Penn State’s quarterback has played beyond just the leadership/intangibles everyone expected.
  • The hosts were impressed by:
    • his command of the offense,
    • accountability after mistakes,
    • willingness to throw into tight windows,
    • and a few high-level throws, including a standout deep ball to Zay Robinson.
  • Audrey emphasized that the quarterback’s play has raised the offense’s ceiling, not just stabilized it.

The defense looks legitimately strong

  • Penn State’s defense was described as sound, physical, and very difficult to beat rep-to-rep.
  • The defensive line has been especially impressive for winning individual matchups and holding up against the run.
  • The linebackers were praised for creating plays by “finding work,” not just waiting for the call to come to them.
  • The secondary’s versatility stood out, with multiple players capable of moving around and filling different roles.
  • One area to watch: safety/nickel usage, including how much a versatile defender like Marcus Neal stays on the field in different packages.

Buffalo Preview

What Penn State should learn in this game

  • This game is less about the final score and more about:
    • identifying a workable running back rotation,
    • seeing who can become a real depth piece,
    • and continuing to evaluate defensive rotations.
  • The hosts expect Penn State to be heavily favored and to use this as a chance to get backups meaningful reps.

Players to watch

  • Zay Robinson was the offensive player Audrey picked to watch, especially because of his explosiveness as a receiver and return man.
  • On defense, the secondary and edge rotation were the biggest areas of interest.

Score predictions

  • John: Penn State 42, Buffalo 3
  • Audrey: Penn State 41, Buffalo 6
  • Both expected a comfortable win and a chance for the offense to look cleaner on the ground.

Listener Q&A and Other Topics

Personnel groupings explained

  • John broke down common personnel packages:
    • 11 personnel = 1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR
    • 12 personnel = 1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR
    • 14 personnel = 1 RB, 4 TE, 0 WR
  • They noted Penn State’s willingness to use heavier personnel groupings, especially with a tight end-heavy identity.

NIL spending discussion

  • They referenced reporting that Penn State’s NIL/roster spending is estimated in the $29–32 million range.
  • Their view:
    • Penn State is competitive, but it probably cannot match the top of the market dollar-for-dollar year after year.
    • The program likely needs to pick its spots and spend aggressively in select years.
    • Closing the gap with programs backed by huge boosters or massive brands is difficult.

Fan reaction to the running backs

  • They agreed that fans may be overreacting a bit to Quentin Martin Jr.’s limited usage.
  • At the same time, they acknowledged that if he gets extended work and flashes big-play ability, the conversation will only grow louder.

Miscellaneous note

  • The episode also included some lighter discussion about:
    • the team’s media schedule,
    • James Franklin’s “Hi, Michael” viral moment,
    • Miami’s Nike deal,
    • and a brief Packers debate.

Bottom Line

Penn State’s defense and offensive line look ready for bigger challenges, but the run game remains the central issue entering Big Ten play. This Buffalo matchup is viewed as an opportunity to clean up execution, sort out the backfield rotation, and let the offense build momentum before the competition level rises.