Why Human Intelligence is Rapidly Decreasing - With Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath

Summary of Why Human Intelligence is Rapidly Decreasing - With Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath

by Shawn Stevenson

1h 1m•August 17, 2026

Overview of The Model Health Show Episode

In this episode of The Model Health Show, Shawn Stevenson speaks with neuroscientist and educator Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath about a major trend reversing across modern childhood: children are becoming less cognitively capable than previous generations. The conversation argues that the rapid expansion of digital technology in schools and everyday life has harmed attention, memory, literacy, numeracy, creativity, and social development. Horvath also outlines practical steps parents and educators can take to reduce screen dependency and rebuild stronger learning habits.

Main Thesis: Why Human Intelligence Is Declining

Dr. Horvath explains that for over a century, each generation generally outperformed the last in cognitive measures like:

  • IQ
  • Working memory
  • Sustained attention
  • Literacy
  • Numeracy
  • Creativity

But that trend has reversed, especially for Gen Z and younger children. According to Horvath, the biggest change is not biology, but environment—specifically the rise of digital technology in learning.

Key idea

Human biology has not changed fast enough to explain the drop, so the environment around learning has changed instead.

Why Digital Learning Is Failing

Horvath argues that ed tech and screen-based learning were sold as efficiency upgrades, but they misunderstand how humans actually learn.

Problems with tech-based learning

  • Learning is not just information transfer

    • Engineers often treat learning like downloading data into a computer.
    • Human learning is biological, social, embodied, and slow.
  • Speed is not the same as learning

    • Tech often promises faster learning.
    • Horvath argues slower learning is usually deeper learning.
  • Screens reduce depth

    • Children may complete tasks faster on tech, but retain less.
    • Literacy, numeracy, and critical thinking all suffer when learning shifts online.
  • COVID normalized a bad substitute

    • Remote learning was a necessary emergency measure.
    • But many schools never fully rolled back the screen-first approach afterward.

Learning Is Social and Biological

One of the episode’s core arguments is that learning is not just brain-based—it is biological and relational.

Human beings learn through resonance

Horvath explains that empathy is not just a feeling; it is a measurable biological synchrony between people. In-person teacher-student connection supports learning because:

  • heart rate can synchronize
  • breathing can synchronize
  • brain activity can become more similar
  • motivation and understanding improve

Why screens are weaker

  • Zoom is weaker than in-person learning
  • Phone calls are weaker than Zoom
  • Texting is the weakest form of connection

The episode warns that digital communication can increase loneliness rather than relieve it, creating a cycle where people seek more connection through the same tool that isolates them.

The Biggest Learning Concepts Discussed

1. The “Mode Effect”

When a person performs a task online, they generally do worse than when doing the same task in an analog format.

Examples:

  • digital tests
  • online assignments
  • screen-based reading
  • computer-based note-taking

Horvath argues that digital testing often hides this problem by “re-norming” scores or redesigning the test to fit screen behavior rather than real skill.

2. The “Fluency Illusion”

The easier something feels, the more people believe they are learning it well—even when they are not.

Examples:

  • rereading text feels easy but often produces weaker learning
  • difficult recall feels harder but leads to better retention

3. Long-Term Memory Is the Foundation of Higher Thinking

Horvath emphasizes that:

  • creativity
  • critical thinking
  • collaboration
  • problem-solving

all grow out of stored knowledge in long-term memory. Access to information is not the same as embodied knowledge.

4. Engagement Is Not Learning

Games and gamified apps can keep children interested, but engagement alone does not guarantee learning.

He argues that:

  • games often teach mechanics, not content
  • children may remember how to “play” the system but not the subject
  • fun and learning are not automatically the same thing

Why Multitasking Makes Everything Worse

The episode strongly warns against multitasking, especially on screens.

What happens when kids multitask

  • speed drops
  • accuracy drops
  • memory drops
  • focus disappears

Horvath says that many children have effectively trained themselves to multitask through constant screen exposure, and this makes focused learning much harder.

School and home problem

Kids now encounter screens both:

  • at home for entertainment
  • at school for learning

That means the same device is associated with distraction, not concentration.

Health and Happiness Are Affected Too

The episode also connects declining cognition with broader declines in:

  • physical health
  • emotional well-being
  • happiness
  • relationships

Horvath argues these trends are not separate accidents—they likely share a common cause: overuse of digital technology in children’s lives.

What Parents Can Do

Horvath gives several practical steps for families to begin reversing the trend.

1. Print things out

If learning matters, use paper when possible.

  • print homework
  • print worksheets
  • print articles
  • print reading material

He argues that children learn better from analog materials than from screens.

2. Do a tech audit

Track:

  • when tech is used
  • how often it is used
  • why it is used
  • how adults model screen use

This helps families see patterns without judgment.

3. Create tech-free time

Examples:

  • one tech-free day per week
  • half-day tech-free blocks
  • family hikes or shared offline activities

He notes that the first few attempts may feel uncomfortable, but that discomfort is often a sign of dependency.

4. Keep learning analog at home

Even if technology stays in the house, learning itself should happen away from screens whenever possible.

What Educators and Leaders Can Do

Horvath stresses that teachers often know screens are harming learning, but they usually lack power to change policy.

Key points for educators

  • teachers see the decline firsthand
  • many are constrained by district policies
  • administrators and parents have more leverage
  • parents must be the ones to push change first

Practical path forward

  • speak at school board meetings
  • question tech-first policies
  • advocate for analog learning and testing
  • support teachers who want to push back

Key Takeaways

  • Children are becoming less cognitively capable than previous generations.
  • Screen-based learning is a major contributor to this decline.
  • Learning is biological, social, and embodied—not just digital information transfer.
  • In-person interaction is superior to text-based or screen-based communication.
  • Engagement, personalization, and gamification often feel effective but may reduce real learning.
  • Long-term memory is the foundation for creativity and critical thinking.
  • Parents are the most important agents of change.

Recommended Actions From the Episode

  • Use paper instead of screens for schoolwork when possible.
  • Reduce multitasking and off-task screen use.
  • Build tech-free family routines.
  • Push schools to prioritize analog learning.
  • Share the message with other parents, teachers, and decision-makers.

Resource Mentioned

  • Book: The Digital Delusion by Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath
  • Website: learningmadeeasyglobal.net

Final Message

The episode’s core message is urgent but hopeful: children are not failing on their own—our systems are failing them. If families and schools begin prioritizing real human connection, analog learning, and focused attention, children can once again move toward stronger intelligence, better health, and better futures.