Goff to the Races! Previewing Every Week 2 Game

Summary of Goff to the Races! Previewing Every Week 2 Game

by ESPN, Omaha Productions, Mina Kimes

1h 19m•September 17, 2026

Overview of Goff to the Races! Previewing Every Week 2 Game

Mina Kimes and Daniel Jeremiah preview every Week 2 NFL game, focusing on the most important scheme matchups, what stood out in Week 1, and where each team has a path to success. The conversation leans heavily on offensive line play, defensive pressure, quarterback decision-making, and a few key personnel developments that could swing games. The biggest throughline: several Week 1 defensive performances were alarmingly bad, while a few units — especially Houston, Seattle, Kansas City, Baltimore, and Tampa Bay — flashed real strength.

Biggest Week 2 Themes

  • Week 1 exposed a lot of defenses. Several teams were much worse than expected, especially the Panthers, Chargers, Rams, and Broncos.
  • Quarterbacks who win with rhythm and in-breakers can attack soft zones. Jared Goff and C.J. Stroud were highlighted as strong fits against defenses that struggled in coverage.
  • 12 personnel and run-game commitment matter. Multiple teams are trying to modernize their offenses by using more tight ends and under-center runs.
  • Pressure packages will define several games. Baltimore, Houston, Pittsburgh, Seattle, and the Jets all have front-seven advantages worth watching.
  • Several rookies stood out early. Abdul Carter, Josiah Trotter, Will McDonald, and Ben Morrison got notable praise.

Game-by-Game Takeaways and Picks

  • Lions vs. Bills

    • Key matchup: Jared Goff attacking the Bills with in-breakers versus a Buffalo defense that was vulnerable over the middle in Week 1.
    • Buffalo’s offense looked cleaner and more in control, with Josh Allen in command and Dalton Kincaid healthy.
    • Pick: Bills for both Mina and Daniel.
  • Panthers vs. Falcons

    • Carolina’s defense was alarmingly poor against Chicago, especially against the run.
    • Atlanta is expected to lean on the ground game, which makes Carolina’s run defense the main concern.
    • Pick: Panthers from both hosts, with the caveat that Bryce Young would have been much better supported by a stronger defense last week.
  • Browns vs. Buccaneers

    • Cleveland’s offense still looks limited and heavily dependent on space and play-action.
    • Tampa Bay’s defense got major praise, with rookies and young defenders standing out.
    • Pick: Buccaneers from both.
  • Bengals vs. Texans

    • Houston’s offense looked more functional with C.J. Stroud working the intermediate middle of the field.
    • Cincinnati’s defense generated pressure, but the linebackers still look like the weakness.
    • Houston’s defense is expected to be angry after Week 1 and may challenge Cincinnati’s more static offensive style.
    • Pick: Texans from both.
  • Packers vs. Jets

    • The Jets’ pass rush — especially Will McDonald and Braelon Allen/edge speed presence noted in the discussion — is a major weapon.
    • Green Bay’s offensive line was described as alarming, but Jordan Love and the receiving group are still dangerous.
    • Pick split: Daniel chose Packers, Mina chose Jets.
  • Eagles vs. Titans

    • Tennessee’s offensive line remains a huge problem.
    • The Titans’ best hope is their lone mismatch on the interior with Jeffrey Simmons versus Philly’s shuffled offensive line.
    • Mina emphasized that Cam Ward is trying too hard and needs simpler completions and less pressure to force plays.
    • Pick: Eagles from both.
  • Vikings vs. Bears

    • Chicago’s offense looked explosive and efficient, even though Caleb Williams still left some plays on the field.
    • Daniel’s key was Cole Kmet/Loveland as a quick-answer target against Brian Flores’ pressure looks.
    • Minnesota’s receivers are a bad matchup for Chicago’s secondary, but the quarterback edge still favored the Bears.
    • Pick: Bears from both.
  • Saints vs. Ravens

    • Baltimore’s defensive pressure package looked devastating in Week 1.
    • Mina’s key was whether Tyler Shough can survive Baltimore’s exotic pressure looks and disguised blitzes.
    • Pick: Ravens from both.
  • Steelers vs. Patriots

    • Pittsburgh’s trenches and defensive front were praised, but the offense still needs to catch the ball and show more consistency.
    • New England’s defense looked better than expected, and Drake Maye will need to simplify his decisions.
    • Pick split: Daniel chose Steelers, Mina chose Patriots.
  • Jaguars vs. Broncos

    • Mina’s focus was Denver’s offense needing to unlock Jalen Waddle more effectively in the intermediate game and on designed touches.
    • Daniel viewed Jacksonville as one of the more physical, underrated teams in the league, especially after its run-game and protection showed well.
    • Pick split: Daniel chose Jaguars, Mina chose Broncos.
  • Raiders vs. Chargers

    • The Chargers’ Week 1 collapse was more about the defense than the offense.
    • Their pass rush looked slow, they didn’t generate clean pressure, and the secondary got exposed.
    • Las Vegas looked better coached and more structurally sound offensively.
    • Pick: Chargers from both, with urgency being the key reason.
  • Dolphins vs. 49ers

    • Mina wanted Miami to be more creative and “weird” with the run game instead of forcing everything under center.
    • San Francisco’s defense was solid, and Miami’s run game didn’t look dynamic enough in Week 1.
    • Pick: 49ers from both.
  • Commanders vs. Cowboys

    • Washington’s front showed some promise, and the offense can stress Dallas with Jayden Daniels’ athleticism.
    • Dallas’ defense was described as a disaster in Week 1.
    • Pick split: Daniel chose Cowboys, Mina chose Cowboys as well, though both expressed low confidence.
  • Seahawks vs. Cardinals

    • Seattle’s defense drew strong praise for structure, communication, and coaching.
    • Daniel pointed out that Arizona may need to blitz more, which could open the door for Seattle’s passing game.
    • Pick: Seahawks from both.
  • Colts vs. Chiefs

    • Indianapolis’ run defense and tackling were a major concern after being bullied by Baltimore.
    • Kansas City’s offense is committing to the run and condensed formations, but the passing game is still not fully synced.
    • The Chiefs’ defense looked refreshed and much more aggressive.
    • Pick: Chiefs from both.
  • Giants vs. Rams

    • The Rams need to stay committed to the run game and avoid getting behind the sticks.
    • The Giants’ defense has real juice, especially with Abdul Carter and other front-seven pieces.
    • The Giants offense may try to mirror San Francisco’s approach by using heavy personnel and attacking matchups.
    • Pick: Rams from both, though the point spread was flagged as potentially too large.

Players and Matchup Nuggets to Watch

  • Jared Goff: Mina/DJ both think his elite in-breaker throwing could be a problem for Buffalo.
  • Josh Allen + Dalton Kincaid: Buffalo’s offense looked smooth and dangerous with Kincaid healthy.
  • Will McDonald: The Jets edge rusher got major praise for his speed and spin move.
  • Josiah Trotter: One of the best rookie performances of the week, with a sack, pick-six, and impact all over the field.
  • Ben Morrison: Drew strong praise for sticky coverage and active tackling.
  • Abdul Carter: Looked like one of the most impressive defenders on the field in Week 1.
  • Antonio Williams: Minimized in the transcript as a player who deserves more snaps in Green Bay’s receiver rotation.
  • Kyle Hamilton usage: Baltimore’s defensive deployment was described as “diabolical.”

Bottom Line

This preview emphasized that Week 2 could be defined by whether teams can exploit the flaws that were exposed in Week 1: bad tackle play, shaky linebacker groups, weak offensive lines, and defenses that struggled with motion and intermediate passing. The consensus leaned toward several contenders — Buffalo, Houston, Baltimore, Kansas City, Seattle, and San Francisco — while a few games were tossed up because of quarterback uncertainty or matchup-specific pressure packages.