Overview of VP JD Vance on Deportations, Greenland, and Don Lemon, PLUS Latest on Savannah Guthrie's Mom's Abduction — The Megyn Kelly Show (Ep. 1245)
This episode (live on SiriusXM) is a two-part show. First, Megyn Kelly interviews Vice President J.D. Vance in his ceremonial office: a wide‑ranging, candid conversation on Washington culture, crime statistics, immigration enforcement/deportations, court fights, foreign policy (Iran, Greenland, China), domestic policy (affordability, voter integrity), and political messaging. The second half shifts to breaking reporting on the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie (mother of NBC’s Savannah Guthrie), featuring crime‑reporter Ashleigh Banfield (exclusive law‑enforcement sourcing) and former FBI profiler James Fitzgerald, who analyze evidence, investigative moves, and ransom‑note claims.
Part 1 — Interview with Vice President J.D. Vance: Key topics & takeaways
-
Setting/tone
- Interview conducted in the VP’s ceremonial office in Washington, D.C.; Vance presents as candid, jokey, policy‑focused and media‑sceptical.
- Vance contrasts D.C. “performative” politics with the president’s blunt style.
-
Crime and public safety
- Vance credits the administration’s “pro‑law‑and‑order” policies and deportations for what he calls a historic drop in crime ("lowest crime rate in 120–125 years," claimed).
- He emphasizes lives saved and praises empowered local law enforcement.
-
Immigration enforcement / deportations
- Administration numbers cited: ~2.2 million “self‑deportations” plus ~675,000 formal deportations (Vance’s framing).
- Vance acknowledges legal/judicial obstacles (nationwide injunctions, activist judges) and says ramp‑up of new ICE officers and appeals to the Supreme Court will accelerate enforcement.
- Discussed Minneapolis tensions (drawdown of some federal officers) — says officers pulled were mostly protective elements, not ICE deportation teams; calls for better local cooperation.
- E‑Verify: supports congressional action; administration has taken administrative steps to limit access to benefits for noncitizens.
-
Courts and separation of powers
- Vance frames judicial injunctions against immigration moves as a challenge to democratic will: “Are the people still sovereign?”
- Expresses concern about judicial animus towards the administration.
-
Domestic politics / Congress / messaging
- Predicts Democrats would focus on investigations and impeachment if they control the House; criticizes Democratic agenda as unified primarily by opposition to Trump and by cultural issues (DEI, gender ideology, abortion).
- On GOP messaging: Vance plans to hit the road more, use nontraditional media/podcasts, and emphasize local outlets to communicate accomplishments.
-
Foreign policy
- Iran: top priority is preventing nuclear weapons; options include diplomacy and military if necessary; careful not to repeat Iraq‑era quagmires.
- Greenland: strategic importance (missile defense) — U.S. has secured commitments/more access; argues the U.S. should get concessions in return for defensive responsibilities.
- China: Vance says relationship should be managed prudently; disputes reporting that the administration has dramatically increased student visas for China.
-
Election integrity
- Supports SAVE Act (voter integrity); pushes for ID checks and wants the Senate to act (acknowledges filibuster challenges).
-
Economy / affordability
- Acknowledges Americans still feel economic pain; cites figures that households lost net wages under Biden and regained some during the Trump administration; highlights industrial investment and declining rents as positives.
-
Personal / 2028 considerations
- On future runs: says family considerations and doing the job well now will determine future decisions; family wellbeing is top priority.
Notable quotes (paraphrased)
- On Washington: “It’s a place where everything is transactional and people try to pretend it’s not.”
- On the president: “What you see is what you get.”
- On enforcement: “We’re not going to stop enforcing our immigration policies.”
Caveats
- Many of Vance’s claims (crime stats, deportation totals, investment figures) are presented as his administration’s framing and should be cross‑checked with independent statistics and official reports.
Part 2 — Savannah Guthrie’s mother (Nancy) missing: Ashleigh Banfield report & James Fitzgerald analysis
Summary of Ashleigh Banfield’s reporting
- Source claim (Ashleigh cites an “impeccable” law‑enforcement contact): investigators believe “son‑in‑law may be the prime suspect.” Name reported: Tommaso Sioni (husband of Savannah’s sister Annie).
- Reported evidentiary points:
- Multiple home cameras (Nest) were smashed/removed.
- The back door reportedly was left open; front‑door tiles show blood drops.
- The sister’s car (Annie Guthrie’s vehicle) was towed/impounded and marked as evidence.
- Investigative focus on ~2:00 a.m. timeframe (based on device separations/pings — Banfield’s source).
- Rumors of ransom notes/emails demanding Bitcoin (multiple outlets reported receiving demands; law enforcement says it’s investigating).
- Law enforcement response: Pima County Sheriff issued a statement saying no suspect or person of interest has been publicly identified; detectives are following leads and coordinating with the FBI. Sheriff also said camera footage so far has been inconclusive.
James Fitzgerald (former FBI profiler) — key analysis points
- Victimology: investigations start with people closest to the victim (family first). Family members being scrutinized is routine.
- Phones/tower pings: investigators likely checked phones and tower data; suspicious late‑night activity by cars/phones would justify seizure/search of a vehicle.
- Car seizure: impounding a vehicle is a standard step to preserve potential forensic evidence (DNA, blood, fibers, trace evidence). Consent vs. warrant unclear; either is commonly used.
- Cameras smashed: suggests mission‑oriented actor who planned aspects of ingress/egress; not necessarily a “mastermind,” but someone thinking ahead about detection.
- Blood evidence: blood at front‑door tiles, limited trail to driveway — possibilities include body carried out, blood deposition patterns, or repositioning. Forensic analysis required.
- Ransom notes: historically many ransoms are accompanied by proof‑of‑life; forensic linguistics and email tracing can help authenticate notes. Not all notes are genuine; some are copycats or hoaxes.
- Investigative posture: treat the case as search‑and‑rescue (assume victim may be alive), but cover all crime possibilities (abduction, homicide, staging, family involvement).
- Forensic linguistics: experts can compare ransom texts/messages to detect same author, non‑native markers, and authenticity signals.
Evidence / timeline (as discussed)
- Saturday night: Nancy last seen returning from event (reports vary: church or Mahjong at church).
- By Sunday morning/noon: family reported concern; sheriff engaged.
- Forensic items raised in the show: smashed Nest cameras (front/back), blood on front entrance tiles, back door open, possible absence of blood trail to the driveway, vehicle towed/impounded, FBI involvement, possible ransom email(s) reported to media.
Law enforcement statements vs. reporting
- Media (Ashleigh, TMZ, local Tucson outlets) report potential suspect and ransom emails; Sheriff’s office explicitly states they have not publicly identified a suspect and cautions against spreading unverified accusations.
- Ashleigh and Fitzgerald emphasize the difference between investigative focus and formal charges; sources may say “may be prime suspect” while authorities withhold public ID.
What to watch next / likely investigative steps
- Whether the Sheriff/FBI will confirm (or arrest) a person of interest (search warrants, charges, public ID).
- Results of forensic testing on the impounded vehicle (DNA, blood, fibers, cadaver dogs).
- Recovery or publishing of camera/cloud footage (Nest account/cloud warrants) and whether footage was destroyed by someone at the scene.
- Authentication and forensic‑linguistic analysis of ransom emails/notes; any proof‑of‑life material provided.
- Search outcomes (areas searched by ground/aerial teams) and any new tips submitted via the Sheriff’s public tip channels (QR code referenced).
Credibility notes & cautions (from the episode)
- Ashleigh Banfield relies on an unnamed but described “high‑level” law‑enforcement source — reporting is breaking and not fully corroborated on the record.
- Pima County Sheriff’s public statement: “At this point, investigators have not identified a suspect or person of interest.” Law enforcement often limits public disclosures while preserving investigative integrity.
- Listeners/readers should treat allegations (e.g., son‑in‑law as “prime suspect”) as unconfirmed until official charging/identification by investigators or court filings.
Notable soundbites (paraphrased)
- Ashleigh Banfield: her source told her “they now believe that son‑in‑law may be the prime suspect.”
- Sheriff: investigators “have not identified a suspect or person of interest… we are taking all tips and leads very seriously.”
Actionable items / recommended responsible behavior for the public
- Do not spread unverified accusations on social media; they can harm investigations and innocent people.
- If you have pertinent tips, use official law‑enforcement channels (Pima County Sheriff tip line/QR code) — authorities said tips go directly to detectives and the FBI.
- Avoid sharing or amplifying ransom emails/notes publicly before investigators verify them (can tip off perpetrators or compromise tracing efforts).
- Respect the family’s privacy while following official updates.
Quick takeaway
- Vance interview: administration themes — tough immigration enforcement, law‑and‑order framing, global posture on Iran/Greenland, and a concerted push on messaging and domestic economic claims.
- Guthrie abduction coverage: breaking, fluid, source‑driven reporting that indicates a potential family‑connected suspect, smashed cameras, blood at the threshold, and an impounded vehicle — but law enforcement has not publicly named a suspect; forensic work and FBI coordination are ongoing. Expect developments and official updates before conclusions can be drawn.