Truth About Shooting in Minneapolis, and Shock Anti-ICE Network Details, w/ James O'Keefe, Dave Aronberg, and Andrew Branca  |  Ep. 1238

Summary of Truth About Shooting in Minneapolis, and Shock Anti-ICE Network Details, w/ James O'Keefe, Dave Aronberg, and Andrew Branca | Ep. 1238

by SiriusXM

1h 41mJanuary 26, 2026

Overview of Truth About Shooting in Minneapolis, and Shock Anti-ICE Network Details (The Megyn Kelly Show — Ep. 1238)

This episode centers on the January Minneapolis confrontation in which Border Patrol/ICE agents shot 37-year-old Alex Preddy during an attempted arrest amid large anti‑ICE protests. Megyn Kelly interviews on‑the‑ground reporter James O’Keefe and hosts a legal debate with Andrew Branca and former prosecutor Dave Ehrenberg. The show covers (1) what the available video shows, (2) claims about highly organized anti‑ICE/anti‑federal networks in Minneapolis (signal chats, spotters, autonomous-zone tactics), (3) political reactions and deployment decisions, and (4) competing legal interpretations of whether agents’ use of deadly force was justified.

Key topics covered

  • The Minneapolis shooting of Alex Preddy during an ICE/Border Patrol operation.
  • Video breakdowns (DropSite News, AFStreamWatch clips) and audio timeline: shouts of “gun,” followed seconds later by multiple rounds fired.
  • On‑the‑ground reporting from James O’Keefe: protesters allegedly organized, aggressive, doing doxxing/spotting/hotel swarms and threats against press/federal agents.
  • Conflicting official narratives: DHS/ICE initial characterizations, pushback from agents, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz’s statements criticizing federal actions.
  • Political responses: President Trump sending Tom Homan to Minnesota; talk of using National Guard, Insurrection Act, or withdrawing federal enforcement as political strategies.
  • Legal issues: self‑defense standard, Graham v. Connor “objective reasonableness,” potential criminal and civil exposures for agents, and federal vs. state prosecution dynamics.
  • Separate but related legal action: arrests (three made so far) and an affidavit alleging protesters violently disrupted a church service (FACE Act / conspiracy against rights claims).

What the video/audio evidence shows (as discussed)

  • Multiple videos captured the confrontation: whistles, large crowd noise, agents struggling with Preddy after an earlier shoving incident and pepper spray deployment.
  • An agent is heard yelling “gun” or “gun, gun” before shots are fired; there is a short span (reported ~2–3 seconds) between the shout(s) and the first gunfire.
  • Agents recovered a 9mm handgun and additional magazines at or near the scene.
  • Stabilized, slowed clips (AFStreamWatch) show an agent in a gray coat apparently grabbing something near Preddy’s waist at roughly the moment gunfire begins; camera angles partially obscured key moments.
  • There are credible reports (cited on the show) that the recovered firearm model may have a history of alleged uncommanded discharges. That possibility is being investigated as one potential chain-of-events explanation (e.g., accidental discharge by an officer while seizing the gun → other officers believe a shot was fired → they return fire).

James O’Keefe’s on‑the‑ground reporting — main claims

  • Protesters were highly organized: signal/Signal chats, spotters at corners, personnel inside hotels and other infrastructure.
  • He and his team were aggressively confronted, followed, patted down, projectiles thrown (ice bricks, rocks), and received death threats that referenced their vehicle plate; he reported being threatened and briefly pursued out of hotels.
  • O’Keefe says police presence was limited/absent in areas that had effectively become “no‑go” or autonomous zones for law enforcement.
  • He described protesters treating journalists and perceived opponents as “feds,” conducting citizen‑style searches and confiscations.

Political context and reactions noted

  • Gov. Tim Walz publicly condemned federal ICE/Border Patrol actions, called them brutal and called for removal of federal agents; his comments sparked strong pushback.
  • President Trump announced sending Tom Homan to Minnesota and said he would coordinate with Governor Walz; later tweets reiterated federal support for locating criminals.
  • Internal polling and national polls (cited on show) indicate many independents and a plurality of Americans think ICE tactics have “gone too far,” which the show argued has political implications for Republicans going into midterms.
  • Megyn Kelly floated (rhetorically/tongue‑in‑cheek) strong federal countermeasures (pull ICE out, ship migrants to Minnesota, use Insurrection Act or National Guard) as political and tactical options.

Legal analysis — core arguments from the panel

  • Legal standard (agreed point): Use of force by officers is judged under Graham v. Connor — “objective reasonableness” of the officer’s perception at the moment; prosecutors must disprove reasonableness beyond a reasonable doubt to secure criminal convictions.
  • Andrew Branca (self‑defense law expert): argued the shooting can be legally justified. Key points:
    • Officers heard “gun,” observed a suspect involved in a physical altercation and perceived an imminent deadly threat.
    • An individual who places hands on a federal agent can be committing a federal offense; in that totality, officers’ split‑second decisions can be reasonable even if later information shows the suspect held a phone or was not actively firing.
    • Multiple shots from several officers within seconds are not per se unlawful if the initial perception justified deadly force and the threat was not already neutralized.
  • Dave Ehrenberg (former prosecutor): skeptical that the available footage establishes objective reasonableness for all shots fired. Key points:
    • He questions whether felony assault on a federal agent was clearly established from the videos; he saw Preddy’s hands holding a phone and reacting after being pepper‑sprayed.
    • Notes potential for prosecution — indictments are possible, but convictions are difficult; federal removal/immunity and venue issues complicate outcomes.
    • Highlights the possibility that the firearm’s alleged uncommanded discharge and the officers’ subsequent reactions could form a complex factual issue for grand juries/trials.
  • Procedural concerns:
    • If state charges proceed, cases can be removed to federal court; federal defenses (supremacy, qualified immunity) and political choices by DOJ will influence prosecution or dismissal.
    • No statute of limitations for murder could permit future state prosecutions even if federal actions occur now or officers receive pardons for federal liability.

Church protest affidavit / FACE Act claims (separate but related)

  • The episode reviewed a DHS/ICE affidavit alleging that protesters violently disrupted a church service: obstructed exits, traumatized children, caused injury (one parishioner broke an arm), and threats of firearms.
  • Magistrate judge initially denied warrants for several public figures but authorized warrants for three identified alleged leaders; DOJ pursued additional judicial remedies and a grand jury process is reportedly beginning.
  • These FACE Act / conspiracy‑against‑rights allegations are presented as serious federal offenses with documented victim trauma in the affidavit.

Notable quotes and soundbites

  • Megyn Kelly: characterized the organized agitators as “terrorists” and urged strong federal action.
  • James O’Keefe: “They have spotters on most street corners…they patted me down like they were the authorities…they will kill press.”
  • Andrew Branca: “The only person responsible for the death of Alex Preddy is Alex Preddy” (argument framed around Preddy’s actions initiating the sequence).
  • Dave Ehrenberg: emphasized that the shooting “may be indictable” and stressed differences between proving probable cause vs. proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

What remains unresolved / caveats

  • Multiple factual points remain under investigation: whether Preddy drew or brandished the weapon, whether the recovered gun fired uncommanded, which agent(s) fired first, and how many officers discharged weapons.
  • Initial public statements (DHS, state officials) have been challenged by internal agent reports and news outlets; early narratives changed as more video and agent statements emerged.
  • The media environment includes manipulated/AI‑altered videos; the hosts repeatedly urged listeners to rely on verified footage and official investigations.
  • Legal outcomes hinge on DOJ/state prosecutorial decisions, grand jury findings, availability/turnover of federal evidence, and judicial rulings on immunity and removal.

Expected next steps / likely developments

  • Federal and state investigations will continue; a grand jury process is reported to be starting for some related church protest matters.
  • Tom Homan’s deployment to Minnesota (per President Trump) could change tactics/coordination between federal and state authorities.
  • Possible further arrests related to the church disruptions and organized protest activities.
  • For the Preddy shooting: forensic firearms examination (including trigger mechanics), witness interviews, and body‑cam or other footage reviews will be determinative.

Actionable takeaways for listeners/readers

  • Treat early social media footage and claims with caution — wait for vetted, multiple‑angle verification.
  • Key sources to watch for updates: DOJ/ICE official releases, local prosecutor announcements, verified videos from DropSite News / AFStreamWatch / reporters on the ground (O’Keefe, Cam Higby, Azra Nomani), and court filings (affidavits, warrants).
  • Expect a politically charged environment: statements from elected officials and media narratives will shape public perceptions and may influence prosecutorial choices.

Sources / evidence cited on the episode

  • On‑scene video from DropSite News; stabilized/slowed clips from AFStreamWatch.
  • James O’Keefe’s on‑the‑ground reporting and social posts (including posted death‑threat screenshot).
  • Affidavit filed by DHS/ICE Special Agent Timothy Gerber regarding the church disruption (summarized in the show).
  • Statements and reporting from Fox News, NBC tracker, New York Post, Axios, Wall Street Journal; polling cited (New York Times, internal GOP polling via Axios).
  • Panel legal references: Graham v. Connor (excessive force objective reasonableness standard).

Note: The episode mixes verified reporting, opinion, and political commentary. Several factual questions are still open; this summary reflects what the show presented and flagged as under investigation.