Mistrusting the process: containing Congo’s Ebola outbreak

Summary of Mistrusting the process: containing Congo’s Ebola outbreak

by The Economist

21m•June 1, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of The Intelligence by The Economist

This episode opens with a deep dive into Congo’s Ebola outbreak, focusing on why containment is so difficult in eastern DRC: distrust of authorities, conflict, weak health infrastructure, and delays in response. It then shifts to Europe’s efforts to reduce dependence on American tech companies, especially in cloud, AI, and government systems. The episode ends on a lighter note with a feature on the sticky toffee pudding—its origins, modern reinvention, and why many still think the classic version is best.

Ebola in Eastern Congo: Why Containment Is So Hard

The outbreak’s current status

  • The Ebola outbreak is centered in Ituri province in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
  • Officials estimate 1,000+ suspected cases and around 250 deaths, though those numbers may be undercounts due to limited testing.
  • There are signs of spread beyond the epicenter:
    • South Kivu
    • North Kivu
    • Uganda
  • Experts are also watching South Sudan closely.

Why the response is struggling

  • Deep mistrust of government and NGOs is undermining public-health efforts.
  • In some communities:
    • A third of people reportedly do not believe Ebola is real.
    • Burial teams are resisted because local customs involve washing the dead, which can spread the virus.
  • The region is also complicated by:
    • Extreme poverty
    • Refugee flows
    • Militia violence
    • A group with reported links to Islamic State
  • Health workers are trying to do several things at once:
    • test and confirm cases
    • isolate patients
    • trace contacts
    • build community trust
    • establish treatment and burial protocols

The “institutional immune system”

John McDermott describes outbreak control as depending on three linked fronts:

  1. The field — boots-on-the-ground health operations
  2. Politicians’ offices — funding, coordination, and state authority
  3. The lab — diagnostics and vaccine development

Vaccine challenge

  • This outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo strain, for which there is no licensed vaccine yet.
  • Scientists are working on an experimental vaccine, but it is still early-stage and would likely take 2–3 months at best before being ready to ship.

Main takeaway

  • The outbreak is expected to worsen before it improves, but the episode stresses that it is not too late to limit the damage if funding, logistics, and science all move quickly.

Europe’s Bid for Tech Sovereignty

What Europe is worried about

  • Europe is increasingly uneasy about dependence on American tech firms in cloud computing, AI, and digital infrastructure.
  • Concerns include:
    • exposure of sensitive data
    • possible legal access under laws like the US CLOUD Act
    • geopolitical dependence on US-controlled platforms
    • the risk of being locked into critical services

What governments are doing

  • The EU is preparing a tech sovereignty package, including cloud and AI development measures.
  • Examples of action already underway:
    • France is moving government computers from Windows to Linux
    • Germany’s intelligence service has chosen a French analytics firm over Palantir
  • Sensitive sectors such as:
    • defense
    • health
    • finance
      are most concerned about sovereignty and security.

Limits of switching

  • American cloud providers are offering “sovereign” versions of their services, but critics call this sovereign washing.
  • Even when Europe wants to switch, it faces major obstacles:
    • high switching costs
    • integrated service lock-in
    • quality and price advantages of US firms
    • the need to remain globally competitive

Main takeaway

  • Europe wants more control over its digital future, but building a full tech ecosystem from scratch is extremely hard, and regulation alone is unlikely to eliminate dependence on US firms.

Sticky Toffee Pudding: Tradition vs Reinvention

What makes it notable

  • The segment visits Hawksmoor in London to examine the classic British dessert.
  • Peter Woods, the restaurant group’s development chef, argues that the best sticky toffee pudding does not need elaborate upgrades.

Origins and rise

  • The dessert’s origin is somewhat disputed:
    • Francis Coulson is often credited with inventing it in the 1970s
    • another Lake District hotel claims it helped popularize it
  • It became a pub staple by the 1990s and later a mainstream restaurant dessert.

Why it’s back in the spotlight

  • A TikTok creator known as “the STP guy” has revived interest with dessert reviews.
  • The episode notes a wave of inventive variations, including:
    • miso
    • cocoa crumble
    • green apple sorbet
    • healthier swaps like yogurt, almond milk, or protein powder

Main takeaway

  • Despite modern twists, the segment argues the classic version remains hard to beat: if the original is already excellent, why complicate it?

Key Takeaways

  • Ebola in Congo remains a race against mistrust, conflict, and time.
  • Public health response depends as much on legitimacy and trust as on medicine.
  • Europe’s tech dependence on the US is a strategic concern, but switching is difficult.
  • Sticky toffee pudding shows how tradition can survive even as people keep trying to reinvent it.