What’s Wright - Nick Wright's Mailbag: Mahomes, Allen & Lamar ALL-TIME RANKING, Giannis to OKC? + NBA expansion

Summary of What’s Wright - Nick Wright's Mailbag: Mahomes, Allen & Lamar ALL-TIME RANKING, Giannis to OKC? + NBA expansion

by iHeartPodcasts and The Volume

39mApril 4, 2026

Overview of What’s Wright — Nick Wright's Mailbag (Episode 441)

Nick Wright hosts a mailbag episode covering a wide range of sports topics submitted by listeners. Major topics: whether OKC should pursue Giannis, how an NBA expansion draft would work and which teams/players would be most affected, Final Four betting picks, all-time career projections for the “big four” QBs (Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow), Lamar Jackson’s career trajectory, instant replay in sports, Nick’s personal “made it” moments in media, and his personal Mount Rushmore of sports moments.

NBA: Giannis to OKC, expansion draft, and roster implications

  • Giannis to OKC?

    • Nick’s answer: No — he would not recommend trading for Giannis even if OKC lost in Round 2.
    • Reasons:
      • Giannis’ recent lower-body injuries make his long-term durability riskier.
      • Age and contract complexity: any trade likely requires committing to a long extension into Giannis’ mid-30s.
      • OKC has surprising depth (Shea, Jalen Williams, Chet, AJ Mitchell, etc.) and should avoid gutting a sustainable timeline.
      • Trades for Giannis make sense only for teams in “desperation” mode with the assets and willingness to retool immediate timelines.
    • Other teams mentioned as possible suitors (but unlikely or asset-poor): Knicks, Rockets (if desperate), Lakers (lack assets), Warriors (lack assets), Heat (maybe).
  • How an NBA expansion draft typically works (Nick’s explanation):

    • Expansion teams would likely receive mid-first-round picks (e.g., 6th and 7th picks).
    • Expansion draft: each existing team can protect a set number of players (historically eight).
    • Expansion teams can select up to one player per team and would assume that player’s contract.
    • Teams often leave higher-salary or expiring-contract players unprotected to deter selection.
    • There have historically been rules limiting an expansion team’s ability to win the draft lottery in their first few years.
  • Who would be most affected?

    • Deep teams with more than eight quality players are most vulnerable.
    • Oklahoma City Thunder cited repeatedly as a team with many worthy protections and potential players left exposed (Cason Wallace, Jalen Williams others).
    • Spurs, Celtics, Knicks also discussed as deep/interesting rosters in this context.

NCAA Final Four picks / Betting insight

  • Nick’s Final Four bets:
    • Arizona +1.5 (small underdog pick)
    • UConn +1.5 (small underdog pick)
  • Rationale: both matchups expected to be outstanding; he favors the underdogs as small plus-line plays.

NFL: All-time rankings and projections for Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow

  • Mahomes

    • Current view: already a top-2 QB in Nick’s eyes.
    • Long-term smart bet: Mahomes likely finishes #2 all-time, and could eventually be the only realistic candidate to challenge Tom Brady for #1 (but that’s a high bar).
  • Lamar Jackson vs. Josh Allen vs. Joe Burrow

    • In the present moment: Nick ranks Lamar ahead of Josh Allen.
    • Projected career endpoints (post-merger / modern-era framing):
      • Mahomes: likely #2 (possibly climbs toward Brady in ultimate legacy).
      • Josh Allen: expected to finish around the Steve Young / Kurt Warner tier (right outside top 10 modern-era).
      • Lamar Jackson: likely to finish in the approximate area of Ben Roethlisberger (mid-teens range) — Nick emphasizes Lamar’s incredible regular-season production and two MVPs, but playoff shortcomings matter.
      • Joe Burrow: projected more like Matt Stafford-level (around 20–22 range), facing tougher HOF odds due to injuries and team success variability.
    • Key caveat: championship wins, playoff lapses, and injuries will shift these projections.
  • On Lamar’s career and perception

    • Has he overachieved early expectations? Yes — unanimous MVP, transcendent regular-season play, and far exceeded draft-slot expectations.
    • Why some prefer Burrow: some evaluators prioritize pure passing play/“passer” traits and separate mobility/rushing-based value from traditional passer rankings — that skews comparisons.

Instant replay and Hawkeye (tennis) — Nick’s take

  • Tennis Hawkeye: functions well (accurate, instant); he accepts it.
  • Broader concern: “mission creep” of replay systems across sports.
    • Replay intended for clear, black-and-white fixes has expanded into nuanced calls, changing long-standing on-court/out-of-play conventions.
    • Examples: baseball stolen-base/tag calls and NBA loose-ball vs. kickouts being altered by replay-level physics details.
    • Net view: while beneficial for accuracy, replay expansion has sometimes harmed the flow/logic of sports.

Personal & cultural items

  • Nick’s “Made it” moments in sports media:

    • Filling in for Colin Cowherd on The Herd (around July 2016, just before KD-to-Warriors fallout) — a career-defining pinch-me moment.
    • Lunch with Colin Kaepernick after he’d defended his protest; receiving a DM from Aaron Rodgers praising similar points; and instances where producers/coaching staffs used his on-air segments internally.
    • Ten-year anniversary at Fox (joined April 20, 2016) noted as a milestone.
  • Nick’s Mount Rushmore of sports moments (personal favorites that give him goosebumps):

    • Tiger Woods’ 2019 Masters win.
    • LeBron James’ block in Game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals (on Andre Iguodala).
    • Patrick Mahomes’ overtime Super Bowl drive that cemented the Chiefs’ dynasty (game referenced as the comeback/O.T. Super Bowl).
    • Usain Bolt’s 100m Olympic celebration/finish.
  • World Cup sleeper picks

    • Long-shot pick: Norway (Nick’s suggestion as a deeper dark horse).
    • Croatia also noted as a potential deep-run candidate based on recent consistency (but very long odds).

Quick Q&A / Miscellaneous

  • Would Nick be an NFL GM, NBA GM, or pro poker player?

    • Best fit: NFL GM.
    • Second: professional poker player (but notes modern poker is extremely elite and less booze-and-bluff than before).
    • Worst fit: NBA GM (small rosters and less decision latitude would frustrate him).
  • Book club: he’s open to bringing it back in a different format but wants to avoid long on-air readings and needs a better structure.

Key takeaways / Recommendations

  • For OKC fans: avoid big, risky trades for aging/injury-prone superstars like Giannis — preserve depth and timeline.
  • For bettors: Nick’s Final Four lean is to back Arizona +1.5 and UConn +1.5.
  • For NFL watchers: current rankings place Mahomes as the generational successor-level QB (already top-2 in Nick’s view); Lamar still leads Allen in current reputation because of MVPs and dynamic play, but future playoff success will alter final legacies.
  • For sports governance fans: be cautious about extending replay into subjective or physics-nuanced areas; the costs to the game’s flow and historical conventions can be substantial.

Notable quotes (paraphrased)

  • “If you trade for Giannis, you’re signing up for age 33, 34, 35 at a minimum.”
  • “Lamar is one of the greatest regular-season players ever — he just needs one deep playoff run to change narrative.”
  • “The mission creep on instant replay is what kills me.”

Episode runtime: Nick’s mailbag format hits several listener-submitted questions with short, opinionated takes — useful for fans wanting quick perspectives on roster strategy, expansion logistics, QB legacies, and betting angles without a deeper long-form interview.