Brendan Schaub EXPOSES Boxing Corruption After Usyk Fight | TFATK Ep. 1192

Summary of Brendan Schaub EXPOSES Boxing Corruption After Usyk Fight | TFATK Ep. 1192

by Thiccc Boy Studios | PodcastOne

1h 8mMay 26, 2026

Overview of TFATK Ep. 1192

Brendan Schaub and Bryan Callen spend much of this episode reacting to the Oleksandr Usyk vs. Rico Verhoeven-style super fight talk, arguing about whether the stoppage was premature and why boxing is often seen as one of the most corrupt combat sports. From there, the conversation branches into the usual TFATK mix of lifestyle banter, viral clips, celebrity drama, sports news, and bizarre internet topics.

Main Topic: Usyk Fight, Stoppage Controversy, and Boxing Politics

Their take on the fight

  • The hosts strongly question the stoppage and call it an example of how boxing can be influenced by bad officiating or corruption.
  • They argue that the larger fighter in the matchup used size, pressure, and awkward angles effectively, and that the fight looked closer than the stoppage suggested.
  • They emphasize that Oleksandr Usyk is an elite, historically great boxer with ridiculous ring IQ and movement, but that the performance in this fight looked below his usual level.
  • They also note that Rico Verhoeven is an all-time kickboxing heavyweight with outstanding pedigree and should not be dismissed as just a “big guy.”

Broader boxing talk

  • They repeatedly call boxing the “most corrupt” major combat sport, especially when it comes to judging and referee decisions.
  • They discuss how “A-side” fighters often get favorable treatment, but also how those same stars can sometimes underperform in crossover/super-fight settings because of pressure and underestimation.
  • The episode touches on how boxing, kickboxing, and MMA are not interchangeable skill sets:
    • Boxers usually struggle badly in kickboxing or MMA.
    • Kickboxers and MMA fighters can sometimes cross over into boxing and make money, but the reverse is rarely true.
  • They speculate that a rematch would likely favor Usyk more heavily if he takes the fight seriously next time.

Other Sports and Fight Talk

  • Jake Paul vs. elite heavyweights: They joke about Jake Paul’s willingness to fight dangerous opponents and discuss how much money it would take to step into the ring.
  • Francis Ngannou / Anthony Joshua comparisons: They contrast crossover boxing fights and how one elite boxer is still a very different level of threat.
  • Combat sports hierarchy: They repeatedly circle back to the idea that boxing is easier to enter than MMA or kickboxing, but far harder to survive in against specialists from other disciplines.

Lifestyle, Personal Banter, and San Diego Talk

San Diego weekend

  • Brendan talks about being in San Diego and how much he loves the weather and laid-back vibe.
  • They discuss the cost of living being steep, especially for anyone trying to raise a family there.
  • The conversation includes a lot of casual summer/Memorial Day energy, barbecues, and neighborhood hangouts.

Training and TRT

  • They talk about morning workouts, staying consistent, and how dialing in testosterone/TRT made a difference.
  • The tone is very “middle-aged gym guy,” with jokes about keeping the body tight and not wasting the day.

Sea lion story

  • Brendan tells a dramatic story about a sea lion bite in San Diego, tying it into a discussion about how dangerous wildlife can be when people get too close.
  • The bit spirals into jokes about whether sea lion meat is edible and what Inuits historically used for survival.

Viral Clips, Internet Drama, and Pop Culture

Chelsea Handler and the roast backlash

  • They spend a long stretch on Chelsea Handler’s criticism of comedians after the roast.
  • They and their guests push back hard, arguing:
    • roasts are supposed to be offensive,
    • Chelsea’s comments are hypocritical given her own edgy history,
    • and she’s trying to sound righteous while still being part of the same comedy world.
  • Shane Gillis’ response is highlighted as especially funny and classy.

A bizarre custody/divorce documentary

  • They discuss a Hulu documentary about parents using children in custody disputes, including allegations, court drama, and manipulation.
  • Their takeaway is that family court battles can become deeply toxic, expensive, and psychologically damaging for everyone involved.
  • The discussion turns into a broader reflection on how parents can weaponize kids during divorce.

Drake surprises a TikTok dad

  • They react positively to a viral clip of a father whose daughter loves Drake songs.
  • Drake appears in the backseat and later gifts the family an Escalade, which they see as a genuinely cool gesture.

Hooters rebrand discussion

  • They talk about reports that Hooters may be trying to become more family-friendly.
  • Their view: if Hooters removes the core appeal, it risks losing the point of the brand.
  • They joke that the name still implies a certain product, so the rebrand may be confusing.

News and Side Topics

  • A sudden sepsis-related death: They discuss a recent death from pneumonia that rapidly progressed to sepsis, using it as a reminder that serious symptoms should be taken to the hospital quickly.
  • White House shooting incident: They briefly cover a mentally unstable man opening fire near the White House and note that it was not a political attack so much as a deranged act.
  • Tom Hardy / MobLand: They mention reports of on-set tension and Hardy allegedly being late, with the production siding against him.
  • Facebook / Zuckerberg / origin myths: They debate whether Zuckerberg “stole” Facebook ideas and compare that story to other business-origin controversies.
  • Flamin’ Hot Cheetos story: They also question the famous origin story behind Flamin’ Hot Cheetos and whether it was fully true.
  • Necrophilia tangent: The episode ends on a dark, bizarre internet-clip tangent about people committing sexual acts with corpses, which they treat as another example of how weird the world can get.

Key Takeaways

  • The Usyk fight dominates the episode because they see it as a case study in judging, corruption, and how styles matter in crossover fights.
  • The hosts believe Rico Verhoeven deserves more respect and that the result was not as clear-cut as it should have been.
  • They repeatedly stress that boxing is hard to trust because bad scoring and stoppages can decide major fights.
  • Outside the fight talk, the episode is classic TFATK: casual, chaotic, sports-heavy, and full of internet rabbit holes, celebrity reactions, and crude humor.