The 2nd Amendment and ICE

Summary of The 2nd Amendment and ICE

by Charlie Kirk

37m•January 27, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of The 2nd Amendment and ICE (The Charlie Kirk Show — Jan 27, 2026)

Charlie Kirk and guests discuss the recent ICE/Border Patrol surge in Minneapolis, the fallout around Border Patrol chief Greg Bovino, the shooting involving a man named Preddy, Second Amendment questions about carrying firearms at demonstrations, and a long interview with Rep. Chip Roy (R‑TX) about why Texas is deporting far more people with far less public drama than Minnesota. The episode focuses on tactics vs. messaging for immigration enforcement, responsible gun ownership during confrontations with law enforcement, and broader concerns about immigration policy and cultural change.

Key topics discussed

  • Background and arc of ICE/Border Patrol operations in Minneapolis and why the surge happened (Somali fraud, prior reporting).
  • The role and controversy around Greg Bovino (his transfer/relief, social media exchanges, presidential support).
  • Tom Homan being sent to Minneapolis to reset operations and messaging.
  • The Preddy shooting: context (described as occurring during an organized attempt to impede federal agents, not a protest), implications for armed attendees at demonstrations.
  • Second Amendment and firearms at protests: legal and practical guidance; messaging pitfalls.
  • Rep. Chip Roy interview: differences between Texas and Minnesota enforcement, 287(g) cooperation, state powers to pressure localities, concerns about "Islamification," H‑1B visas, birthright citizenship, and potential DHS funding fights.

Episode breakdown

Minneapolis ICE surge, Bovino, and internal divisions

  • Kirk and cohost Blake set the scene: a high‑visibility ICE surge in Minneapolis tied to fraud investigations (particularly involving Somali communities) and broader immigration enforcement.
  • Greg Bovino (presented as a Border Patrol hero and symbolic on‑the‑ground leader) was transferred/relieved amid controversy after confrontations and social‑media exchanges with lawmakers and critics. President Trump publicly backed him.
  • Administration and enforcement ranks are portrayed as united on the overall immigration agenda but divided on tactics and messaging — some worry about "performative" operations that appear callous; others push for aggressive enforcement.
  • Tom Homan (former ICE director) was sent to Minnesota to "reset" operations and refine messaging while maintaining enforcement.

Second Amendment, public carrying, and the Preddy shooting

  • FBI director Kash Patel and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem made public comments criticizing bringing guns to protests; those remarks were discussed and partially rebutted.
  • Charlie and Blake emphasize: legally and strategically, conservatives should not concede the right to carry firearms to demonstrations. Instead, messaging should stress responsible, safety‑first firearm ownership.
  • Practical guidance emphasized in the show:
    • In many states (including Minnesota, per the hosts), you must disclose a firearm to an officer if the officer asks; only a few states require proactive disclosure at every contact.
    • If stopped with a firearm in a vehicle: turn off the car, place keys visibly, tell the officer you have a firearm — to reduce officer alarm.
    • Avoid approaching or confronting law enforcement while armed in tense operations; make it clear you are not a threat.
  • Context on the Preddy shooting: hosts argue Preddy was involved in a direct action intended to impede federal agents (not attending a peaceful protest), and that bringing a gun into that scenario increases risk. Comparisons to Kyle Rittenhouse are discussed and rejected as inapt.

Interview with Rep. Chip Roy (R‑TX)

  • Discrepancy: Texas handles about 25% of deportations under the current administration, with relatively little public drama; Minnesota handles roughly 2% but has generated most of the controversy.
  • Reasons cited for Texas' better performance:
    • Greater cooperation between state/local law enforcement and ICE via 287(g) agreements.
    • State-level powers to pressure noncooperative jurisdictions (with recent Texas legislative moves to withhold funds and push compliance).
  • Minnesota is described as resisting ICE cooperation; officials (Gov. Tim Walz, Minneapolis leadership) are accused of overstating their coordination.
  • Roy supports targeting the "worst actors" (criminals and those under orders of removal) while also enforcing removal orders broadly — argues you can do both.
  • Broader framing: Roy (and the hosts) argue this is part of an organized cultural/sovereignty threat — raising alarm about what they call the "Islamification of the West," growth in mosques/Islamic centers (examples in Texas), H‑1B and business‑driven immigration pressure, and perceived erosion of assimilation and cultural cohesion.
  • Policy recommendations from Roy:
    • Pause or dramatically tighten immigration (he supports an immigration moratorium or net‑zero approach).
    • Codify enforcement of removal orders and tighten H‑1B/birthright citizenship policy.
    • Support ICE/Border Patrol operationally and politically (send in trusted leaders like Tom Homan).
  • On DHS funding and potential shutdowns: Roy says the House Freedom Caucus will push to hold the line, support the president and ICE, and use reconciliation or other tools if necessary. He suggests calling Democrats' bluff on shutdown threats.

Main takeaways

  • Enforcement vs. messaging: Hosts argue the administration should maintain aggressive enforcement but refine tactics and messaging to avoid unnecessary provocation and accusations of cruelty; swap personnel where needed without signaling policy retreat.
  • Don't cede Second Amendment ground: Conservatives should not accept restrictions on carrying firearms to protests in principle, but must emphasize responsible gun ownership and de‑escalation in practice.
  • Cooperation matters: Texas-style cooperation between local/state authorities and ICE (287(g)) leads to far more removals with less public spectacle than politically resistant jurisdictions like Minneapolis.
  • Bigger policy push: Guests urge broader immigration reform actions — moratoriums, changes to birthright/H‑1B practices, and stronger state tools to force local compliance.
  • Political posture: The hosts and Rep. Roy view this as an existential cultural fight (assimilation, sovereignty, law and order) that requires urgent, coordinated enforcement and political will.

Notable quotes / soundbites

  • Charlie Kirk: "If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're going to end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful." (intro)
  • Blake (pre‑show point paraphrase): "Competence matters — stop being performative for social media; get the job done."
  • Rep. Chip Roy: "We can't win a war that we do not acknowledge exists." (framing immigration enforcement as part of a larger existential struggle)
  • Kirk on firearms at demonstrations: "You have to make sure law enforcement knows that you are not a threat to their lives."

Practical recommendations / action items (for listeners)

  • If you carry publicly: take firearms safety courses, practice de‑escalation, and follow lawful officer requests; disclose a weapon when an officer asks to reduce risk.
  • For advocates who want stricter enforcement:
    • Push for state‑level cooperation agreements (287(g)) and laws that withhold funds from sanctuary jurisdictions.
    • Back administrative leadership that emphasizes both targeted enforcement of the worst actors and consistent application of removal orders.
  • Messaging for conservative activists: emphasize responsible gun ownership, lawfulness, and that enforcement targets criminals and those under court orders — avoid performative displays perceived as intentionally cruel.
  • For concerned voters: engage with local/state representatives about immigration policy, enforcement, and coordination between local law enforcement and ICE.

Caveats / context

  • The episode presents a strongly pro‑enforcement, conservative viewpoint and includes charged cultural framing (e.g., "Islamification"). Listeners should note the political perspective and weigh facts from multiple sources when forming policy conclusions.
  • Legal requirements for firearm disclosure vary by state; the hosts discuss Minnesota rules as they understand them — consult state law or legal counsel for definitive guidance.