Clint Smith: Make America What It Set Out to Be

Summary of Clint Smith: Make America What It Set Out to Be

by The Bulwark

1h 8mJuly 3, 2026

Overview of Clint Smith: Make America What It Set Out to Be

This Bulwark Podcast episode is a July 4th-themed conversation between Tim Miller and author/historian Clint Smith about what America is supposed to stand for versus what it often becomes in practice. The discussion moves from uplifting founding-era quotes to a sober critique of Trump-era attacks on Black advancement, history, public institutions, and multiracial democracy. Smith argues that America is best understood as a creed and an ongoing project—not an ethnic inheritance—and that the country’s job is to keep working toward the promise it made.

Main Themes and Takeaways

America as an aspirational project

  • Miller opens by reading two historical passages:
    • Gerald Ford welcoming new citizens at the 200th anniversary of the Declaration.
    • Thomas Jefferson reflecting on the Declaration’s 50th anniversary and hoping America’s example would eventually free “all.”
  • Together, these are framed as:
    • America welcoming immigrants into its “adventure”
    • America exporting the idea of freedom and self-government to the world
  • The key idea: America is not defined by ancestry, religion, or blood, but by a promise of liberty, rights, and opportunity.

Black military service and the Hegseth Pentagon

  • Smith discusses reporting for The Atlantic on Black service members under Pete Hegseth.
  • He describes:
    • Promotion delays and blocks affecting Black and female senior officers
    • A broader climate of racialized suspicion around DEI and “woke” military culture
    • The emotional burden on service members whose families have served for generations
  • Many Black military members see their service as defending the Constitution’s ideals, not the politicians currently in power.
  • Smith emphasizes the military’s historic role as a pathway to upward mobility for Black Americans.

Chappie James and symbolic erasure

  • A major example is the removal of the portrait of Gen. Daniel “Chappie” James, the first Black four-star general.
  • Smith explains why that mattered:
    • James symbolized what Black officers could achieve
    • Even though he was not a radical figure—he was politically conservative—it still signaled that no Black excellence is safe from attack
  • For many in the military, the removal felt like a message that their own ascent is unwelcome.

Lonnie Bunch and the Smithsonian

  • Smith also discusses Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch, the founding director of the National Museum of African American History and Culture.
  • Bunch is portrayed as:
    • A singular public historian
    • Deeply invested in preserving institutions that tell the full story of American history
  • Smith notes the irony that Trump seems to like Bunch personally, even while his administration attacks the Smithsonian’s work on slavery and race.
  • The larger issue is that the administration wants to narrow the national story and suppress uncomfortable truths.

DEI as a bad-faith political weapon

  • Smith makes a distinction between:
    • Legitimate concerns about efficiency or waste in government programs
    • The administration’s actual use of “DEI” as a broad, politically weaponized label
  • He says the current campaign is not a sincere reform effort, but a deliberate attempt to:
    • Remove Black people and women from positions of authority
    • Reassert a racial hierarchy
    • Recreate something like Jim Crow across institutions
  • He argues that diversity in institutions like the military is not just morally right, but operationally necessary.

The danger of a selective national memory

  • One of Smith’s core arguments is that ignoring the full history of America leads people to mistake inequality for the “natural order.”
  • If the history of slavery, segregation, immigration, and exclusion is erased, then present-day inequality looks inevitable rather than constructed.
  • That, Smith says, is why attacks on history and public education matter.

Personal and Historical Reflections

How to talk to kids about American history

  • Miller and Smith discuss how to explain America’s contradictions to children.
  • Smith says kids usually understand the “both/and” nature of history more easily than adults do:
    • America has done good things
    • America has done terrible things
  • He stresses that parents should be honest, age-appropriate, and willing to learn alongside their children.

Juneteenth and July 4th

  • Smith says Juneteenth feels like his true Independence Day.
  • He sees Juneteenth and July 4th as linked:
    • July 4th marks the ideal
    • Juneteenth reminds us how long freedom was denied
  • His concluding note is that progress comes from “chipping away at the wall” so future generations have less to dismantle.

Black American history and hidden figures

  • Miller quizzes Smith on past “Crash Course Black American History” topics.
  • Smith briefly explains:
    • Shirley Chisholm: first Black woman to run for president in a major-party primary; a model for later Black women in politics
    • Bayard Rustin: a key strategist of nonviolence and the March on Washington, often sidelined because he was gay

Lighthearted Closing Notes

Soccer and the holiday weekend

  • The conversation ends with some soccer talk, including Smith’s love of Senegal.
  • The tone lightens as they discuss Fourth of July food, family, and cookouts.
  • Miller closes by saying he probably won’t watch Trump’s holiday speech live, but may recap it if it turns out to be especially chaotic.

Core Message

The episode argues that America is worth celebrating only if we are honest about what it has been and committed to what it can still become. For Smith, patriotism means:

  • Telling the truth about history
  • Protecting institutions that preserve that truth
  • Defending a multiracial democracy
  • Continuing the unfinished work of making America live up to its founding promise