DONKEY: Florida Teen Runs Over Man And Asks ChatGPT How To Cover It Up

Summary of DONKEY: Florida Teen Runs Over Man And Asks ChatGPT How To Cover It Up

by iHeartPodcasts

6mNovember 18, 2025

Overview of DONKEY: Florida Teen Runs Over Man And Asks ChatGPT How To Cover It Up

This episode segment (Donkey of the Day) from The Breakfast Club / iHeartPodcasts highlights an alleged violent hit-and-run in Florida involving an 18-year-old, Jarrell Jones. Hosts recount the September incident in which Jones allegedly hit a man with his car, ran over him multiple times, fled, and — according to the police report — later used ChatGPT to ask how to cover up the crime. The segment mixes factual summary, commentary about youth and impulsivity, and broader observations about AI, social media permanence, and accountability.

Key facts / timeline

  • Incident occurred in September at the intersection of Silver Star Road and Belco Drive (Orlando area).
  • Alleged suspect: 18-year-old Jarrell Jones.
  • Allegations: Jones struck a man with his car, drove over the victim’s head multiple times (forward, reversed, and again), and then fled the scene.
  • Eyewitness: an Uber driver who was working at the time witnessed the event.
  • Passenger/girlfriend in Jones’s car allegedly said the act was intentional and they did not contact police immediately.
  • Police report claims Jones later asked ChatGPT how to cover up a hit-and-run.
  • Victim was hospitalized with serious injuries and is still alive.
  • Possible additional identifying details from witness: a new silver sedan with tinted windows and a Puerto Rican flag hanging from the rearview mirror.
  • Potential charge mentioned: second-degree attempted murder (probable cause per Orange County detectives).

Main takeaways

  • The story ties violent alleged conduct to a modern twist: using an AI chatbot (ChatGPT) for advice on committing or concealing a crime.
  • Hosts emphasize youth impulse and the permanence/amplifying effect of digital records (social media and AI logs).
  • The segment blends humor and scorn (“Donkey of the Day”) with a serious tone about the victim’s injuries and potential criminal consequences.
  • The report raises questions about how digital evidence (AI queries) might be used by police/prosecutors.

Notable quotes / soundbites

  • “The craziest people in America come from the Bronx and all of Florida.” — recurring joke used by hosts to frame “Florida man” stories.
  • “He asked ChatGPT how to cover up a hit and run.” — central shock line relayed from the police report.
  • “Trouble is easy to get into, but hard to get out of.” — host’s moral takeaway aimed at the suspect.
  • Hosts also questioned the need for lengthy legal proceedings, suggesting the available evidence (witness, girlfriend, alleged AI query) implies clear guilt — illustrating tensions around presumption of innocence vs. public commentary.

Topics discussed / contextual themes

  • Youthful impulsivity and poor decision-making at 18.
  • Social media and AI as permanent/amplifying records of wrongdoing.
  • Legal accountability: charged with attempted murder; role of eyewitness testimony and corroborating statements.
  • Ethics and risks of asking AI tools for illegal advice (and potential legal exposure).
  • Media/hosts’ role in public shaming and commentary on criminal incidents.

Legal and ethical implications (brief)

  • AI queries can be part of an investigative record: police may obtain logs/subpoenas; such queries can serve as evidence of intent or planning.
  • Public commentary before trial can influence public perception of guilt; hosts do express strong opinions despite due process principles.
  • The case highlights the need for caution when using digital tools for illicit purposes and the reality of digital traces.

Recommendations / practical takeaways for listeners

  • Never use AI or other digital services to plan or conceal illegal activity — those interactions may be retrievable and used in investigations.
  • Be mindful that impulsive actions at a young age can have life-defining consequences.
  • If you witness a violent crime, report it to law enforcement rather than staying silent; eyewitness accounts can be crucial.
  • Consider how public commentary about alleged crimes can affect victims and due process.

Final note

The segment uses humor and outrage to spotlight a disturbing alleged crime and the modern twist of AI involvement. It mixes factual reporting from police accounts with the hosts’ editorializing about youth, technology, and accountability.