Fertility Specialist Helps Couples Get Pregnant, Then Has Affair With Wives- Mysteriously Found Dead

Summary of Fertility Specialist Helps Couples Get Pregnant, Then Has Affair With Wives- Mysteriously Found Dead

by Stephanie Soo

1h 5m•February 24, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of "Fertility Specialist Helps Couples Get Pregnant, Then Has Affair With Wives — Mysteriously Found Dead" (host: Stephanie Soo)

This episode (Rotten Mango / Stephanie Soo) examines the 2022 murder of John Takuhara, a well‑liked Hawaiian acupuncturist known for fertility work, who was shot four times in his Waipahu clinic. The story unspools the tangled relationships between Takuhara and multiple female patients, a postnuptial agreement in one couple’s marriage, the investigation (surveillance, a discarded bucket hat, a backpack of cash, phone records), competing suspects, forensic problems with local DNA testing, the trials of Eric Thompson (the husband of one patient), and the broader ethical and social issues raised by the case.

Case summary — timeline & core facts

  • Victim: John (often called “the healer”), an acupuncturist known locally for treating pain and fertility issues; described by patients as generous and effective.
  • Affair(s): Takuhara engaged in sexual relationships with multiple female patients. One high‑profile affair was with Joyce Thompson, who had seen Takuhara for fertility/postpartum issues and later messaged him thousands of times over ~2 months.
  • Postnuptial agreement: After the affair, Joyce (the patient) and her husband Eric Thompson signed a postnuptial agreement that heavily favored Eric (he would get all assets and custody in a divorce). The agreement also included unusual clauses: Joyce was forbidden from visiting psychics and from seeing the fertility specialist (Takuhara).
  • Murder: On or around January 13, 2022, Takuhara was found shot to death in his clinic. The discovery was made when an elderly woman entered the clinic and found him in a pool of blood.
  • Surveillance: Street cameras show a person in all‑black clothing and a large white bucket hat enter the clinic for about 48 seconds and leave. The hat blew off in the wind on camera.
  • Hat recovered: Ten days later the white bucket hat was traced to the edge of a homeless camp; the hat is key to the investigation (possible DNA).
  • Other scene evidence: A backpack containing $4,000 in cash (paper labeled “herbs”), and a wheelbarrow/bucket with melted/charred contents found at Eric Thompson’s home (prosecutors alleged it was used to destroy a ghost gun). Video also shows a fire (disputed whether tiki torches or burning evidence).
  • Arrest/charges: Eric Thompson (the husband of Joyce) was arrested and charged; he posted $1M bond and was released.
  • Trials: First trial ended in mistrial (hung jurors). Second trial resulted in a guilty verdict. At sentencing, Eric was ordered to serve time with eligibility for parole after around 15 years (exact term/appeal details referenced).

Key evidence, holes, and forensic issues

  • Surveillance footage: Person in white bucket hat enters clinic for ~48 seconds — central circumstantial evidence. Ambiguities: hat concealed face; wig/hair under hat observed on tape; gait comparisons used by police (swinging right arm).
  • Hat DNA: DNA reportedly taken from inside the bucket hat initially linked to Eric, but later excluded from trial because Hawaii Police Department (HPD) used unvalidated DNA testing methods; an FBI audit flagged validation problems. This weakened the prosecution’s strongest forensic link.
  • Truck similarities: A white Chevrolet Silverado seen circling the area before the murder. Authorities narrowed to vehicles from that model/year range; only one (Eric’s) had a connection to the victim. Neighbors saw Eric removing his truck toolbox the day before and putting it back later — cited by prosecutors.
  • Phone/phone activity: John’s phone was unlocked after the 48‑second window, creating timeline questions about who accessed the phone and when.
  • No gun recovered: Prosecutors suggested a ghost gun; defense highlighted no murder weapon was found and contested claims about burning evidence (defendant said he burned metal for work / lit tiki torches).
  • Lack of phone tower/cell data placing Eric at scene; DNA evidence problems; several elements remained circumstantial.

Main suspects and motives explored

  • Eric Thompson (husband): Motive argued by prosecution — jealous, humiliated by his wife’s affair; postnuptial clause and other controlling acts presented as evidence of motive. Defense argued third‑party suspects and lack of direct proof.
  • Joyce Thompson (patient/affair partner): Not charged; publicly supported Eric at trial but was central to motive narrative. Signed post‑nup; many messages with Takuhara (5,600+ messages noted over a month).
  • Other men with grievances:
    • John DeMarco: Ex‑husband of a woman who had an affair with Takuhara; initially angry but denied motive for murder.
    • Daryl Fujita: Ex whose girlfriend left him for Takuhara then returned to Daryl; shares a child with her. Exhibited suspicious behavior (e.g., reformatted phone) but denied involvement.
  • Others: Pattern of other women and messages in Takuhara’s phone suggested more potential motives (gambling suggestions, other relationships), complicating a single‑motive narrative.

Legal proceedings & outcome

  • Prosecution theory: Eric killed Takuhara to remove the “stain” on his marriage and allow the family to move on; relied on circumstantial evidence (truck, gait, hat, burning, motive).
  • Defense strategy: Deny involvement; emphasize other men with motives (third‑party defense); attack HPD for poor forensic practice; highlight lack of direct physical evidence.
  • Trials:
    • Trial 1: Mistrial (hung jurors).
    • Trial 2: Guilty verdict (some jurors later said he “probably” did it — controversy over certainty).
  • Sentencing: Eric received a lengthy sentence; minimum eligibility for parole cited as about 15 years. Appeals and post‑conviction issues likely given forensic controversies.

Broader themes & public reaction

  • Ethics in fertility/medical care: Raises questions about power imbalance when practitioners have sexual relationships with vulnerable patients (professional boundaries, license risks).
  • Small‑town dynamics: Community pressures, influence of psychics, and cultural factors in a tight community like Waipahu complicated public discourse and investigation.
  • Forensics and trust in policing: HPD’s unvalidated DNA testing protocols seriously undercut prosecution evidence and illustrate how lab errors can affect justice — both in risking wrongful convictions and in letting guilty parties challenge cases.
  • Victim‑blaming online: Some public commentary blamed Takuhara for his affairs (suggesting he “had it coming”), which spurred debate about whether unethical behavior ever justifies violence.
  • Prenups/postnups oddities: The episode also explores unusual postnuptial clauses (weight clauses, TV limits, forbidding psychics) and why some clauses may be unenforceable. The Thompson post‑nup’s unusual terms (total forfeiture for mother, banning psychic visits and the fertility specialist) drew particular attention.

Unanswered questions / loose ends

  • Paternity: Persistent online speculation about the child’s paternity (whether Takuhara could be the biological father) was never fully addressed in open court or publicly resolved.
  • Complete forensic record: The exclusion of DNA evidence left gaps — no recovered murder weapon, and some physical links remained circumstantial.
  • Motive certainty: While many in the public believe Eric did it, the prosecution relied heavily on circumstantial links; some jurors in the first trial were not convinced beyond reasonable doubt.
  • Role/influence of psychic(s): The post‑nup forbidding psychics and claims that a psychic advised the affair complicate motive theory but are not proven causal factors.

Key takeaways

  • This is a classic example of a case dominated by circumstantial evidence: surveillance, behavioral inferences, and motive, rather than a smoking‑gun forensic trail.
  • Forensic procedure integrity matters enormously — flawed/ unvalidated lab methods can change trial outcomes and public confidence.
  • Ethical boundaries between healthcare providers and vulnerable patients are critical; violations can create cascading harms beyond the immediate relationship.
  • Odd legal documents (postnuptial clauses) may reflect emotional attempts at control or reconciliation, but they rarely cleanly translate into motive or criminal culpability.
  • Many important questions remain open; the case prompted broader conversations about accountability (for practitioners and for policing) and how communities process betrayal, grief, and justice.

If you want a quick reference: the episode focuses on the murder of fertility/acupuncture practitioner John Takuhara, the affair with Joyce Thompson, the Thompson post‑nup, circumstantial evidence pointing at her husband Eric (white bucket hat, similar truck, alleged burning of evidence), forensic lapses in HPD that weakened DNA evidence, two trials (first mistrial, second guilty), a controversial conviction/sentence, and a wider discussion about ethics, small‑town dynamics, and forensic reliability.