Trump Retreats After Alex Pretti's Killing

Summary of Trump Retreats After Alex Pretti's Killing

by Crooked Media

1h 27mJanuary 27, 2026

Overview of Trump Retreats After Alex Pretti's Killing

This Pod Save America episode (Crooked Media) examines the killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis by federal agents, the immediate false/misleading official narrative pushed by administration allies, the local protests and community response, and the political fallout that appears to be forcing at least a partial White House retreat. Hosts Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett and Tommy Vietor mix on-the-ground reporting from Minneapolis with analysis of the White House reaction, personnel changes at DHS, and how Democrats plan to use an upcoming government-funding deadline to press for immigration enforcement reforms.

Key facts about the killing and immediate official response

  • Victim: Alex Pretti (described in the episode as a 37-year-old ICU nurse and community volunteer who filmed federal agents and tried to help a pepper-sprayed protester).
  • Incident: Video shows federal agents tackling, disarming Pretti, then shooting him multiple times (hosts report “at least 10 times”).
  • Officials’ early narrative: Senior administration and aligned commentators (Stephen Miller, J.D. Vance, Kristi Noem, Greg Bovino and others) quickly labeled Pretti a “domestic terrorist,” “assassin,” or claimed he came armed to do “maximum damage.” The hosts characterize those claims as dishonest and unsupported by available footage.
  • Evidence/reaction: Multiple bystander videos contradict the initial claims; community members, medical personnel and some law-enforcement observers dispute the agent narratives. Reporting suggests agents counted bullet holes and delayed medical care.

On-the-ground reporting from Minneapolis (Lovett)

  • Protests and vigils: Mostly peaceful demonstrations, widespread neighborhood vigils, and disciplined nonviolent organizing—people report many first-time protesters showing up.
  • Community impact: Residents afraid to call police, to go to hospitals, or to interact normally because of heavy ICE/CBP presence. Local organizing included mutual aid (coats, food, phones, help for released detainees).
  • Local security: Minnesota National Guard deployed in high-visibility vests to distinguish them from federal agents. Local police are cautious and trying to de-escalate.
  • Atmosphere: Deep community grief and anger; sustained, broad-based outrage that includes voices who normally avoid politics.

Political fallout and White House response

  • Public/political blowback: The killing broke through widely—sports teams, celebrities, some conservatives and Republican officials publicly criticized DHS/ICE/CBP tactics. Polling cited showed rising disapproval of Trump on immigration.
  • Personnel moves: Trump announced Tom Homan would be sent to Minneapolis and Greg Bovino was reported removed from his commander-at-large role (returning to El Centro). Some Border Patrol units are expected to pull back.
  • White House tone shift: Trump reportedly agreed to allow a Minnesota-involved impartial investigation, to consider reducing federal agents in Minnesota, and made outreach calls to the governor and mayor. Press secretary Caroline Leavitt distanced the president from some of the more inflammatory official statements but did not condemn them outright.
  • Continuing concerns: Hosts warn personnel/tone changes don’t resolve the underlying mass-deportation policy or the institutional problems at DHS/CBP/ICE.

How the episode frames the propaganda and lying problem

  • Hosts make the argument that the most chilling aspect is the rapid, blatant disinformation from high-level officials—even when multiple videos exist—and that this lying escalates violence and erodes trust in government.
  • They call out specific figures (Stephen Miller, J.D. Vance, Kristi Noem, Kash Patel, Greg Bovino) for promoting false or misleading narratives and highlight broader patterns of institutional impunity and lack of oversight.

Congressional leverage and the Jan. 30 funding deadline

  • Tactical moment: Senate Democrats are weighing using the DHS funding vote (part of the government funding process) to demand reforms and oversight on ICE/DHS operations; Schumer’s caucus is pushing to separate DHS funding for focused negotiations.
  • Demands being discussed: mandatory identification by federal agents, warrants for interior arrests, body cameras, cooperation with state/local investigations, and stronger inspector-general/civil rights oversight.
  • Political reality: Hosts note limits—ICE has significant pre-allocated funding and structural problems; modest legislative reforms are possible but far short of systemic change (abolish/restructure ICE and DHS remain large, contested proposals).
  • Risks: A shutdown/partial shutdown could be used by the administration to shift blame (TSA delays, FEMA issues), and modest concessions may fail to solve root causes.

Notable quotes & soundbites highlighted by hosts

  • Stephen Miller (as reported/transcribed): called Pretti an “assassin” and suggested domestic terrorism—used by hosts as example of reckless, politicized rhetoric.
  • Jon Lovett/Tommy Vietor: emotional characterizations of Pretti as a hero who “put his body on the line” to protect others and was nevertheless executed.
  • Hosts’ framing: “The lying is escalation,” and “you shouldn't have to be a hero to not be lied about after being shot by agents of the state.”

Other items covered briefly

  • Trump’s optics and activities: Hosts noted Trump’s attendance at a Melania documentary screening and his public focus on legacy projects (ballroom), juxtaposing that with the policy crisis.
  • Media piece on Trump’s health: Ben Terris reporting is discussed—portrays an aging, increasingly frail president surrounded by sycophants; used mainly as cultural/political color.
  • Republicans breaking ranks: Several GOP senators and governors publicly criticized the surge or DHS tactics, highlighting unusual bipartisan pressure.

Main takeaways

  • The killing of Alex Pretti and the administration’s immediate narrative damaged the credibility of DHS/ICE/CBP and created broad public backlash that is politically costly.
  • The White House has made surface-level concessions (personnel tweaks, pledges of an investigation, possible drawdowns), but underlying policy goals (large-scale interior enforcement and deportation targets) remain.
  • Democrats have a tactical opening around the DHS funding vote to demand reforms and oversight—but substantive structural change would be difficult without broader political power.
  • Minneapolis’s response—peaceful, organized, community-focused—has limited immediate violence and sustained public attention; continued documenting and reporting matter for accountability.

What to watch next (actionable signals)

  • Court rulings in Minnesota: injunctions or orders to stop the DHS/CBP surge or preserve evidence.
  • Results of the DHS funding fight (Senate vote): whether DHS is split out and whether Democrats extract enforceable reforms.
  • Personnel changes at DHS/CBP (formal firings, reassignments) and whether those changes alter tactics on the ground.
  • Further video/documentary evidence release (body cams, surveillance) and the scope/tone of any federal investigation that includes state/local participation.
  • Ongoing local organizing and national public opinion shifts—whether this episode is a lasting inflection point or a temporary political backlash.

Closing note (from episode tone)

The hosts emphasize both outrage and admiration—outrage at the killing and the official lies, admiration for community organizing and Pretti’s actions. They argue transparency, independent investigations, and continuing pressure (media, congressional, civic) are essential to prevent recurrence.