Jeffrey Gundlach Says Almost All Financial Assets Are Now Overvalued

Summary of Jeffrey Gundlach Says Almost All Financial Assets Are Now Overvalued

by Bloomberg

59mNovember 17, 2025

Overview of Odd Lots — Episode: Jeffrey Gundlach Says Almost All Financial Assets Are Now Overvalued

This Odd Lots / Odd Thoughts interview (hosts Traci Alloway and Joe Weisenthal) features Jeffrey Gundlach, founder & CEO of DoubleLine Capital. Gundlach lays out a broad, contrarian case that many financial assets are richly valued, identifies private credit as the most likely source of the next market crisis, and warns the U.S. Treasury and interest-rate regimes face structural stress that could force extraordinary policy responses (yield-curve control, debt restructuring). He also gives concrete portfolio guidance: favor short-duration cash-like instruments, non‑U.S. equities, emerging‑market fixed income, gold/real assets, and avoid long Treasuries and opaque private-credit allocations.

Key themes & main takeaways

  • Long-duration U.S. Treasuries are vulnerable. Gundlach expects long-term yields to rise in the next recession rather than fall, breaking the past secular pattern.
  • Private credit is the biggest systemic risk candidate: valuation opacity, liquidity mismatches, weak marking practices, and leverage-on-leverage create the conditions for a crisis.
  • Fiscal stress is real and accelerating: interest expense is already large and could consume an outsized share of tax receipts within a few years under pessimistic but plausible scenarios.
  • Monetary/fiscal policy can — and likely will — be changed dramatically if markets force the issue (yield-curve control, Treasury purchases, coupon restructurings).
  • Portfolio prescriptions: reduce U.S. equity/dollar concentration, prefer short-duration fixed income, add gold/real assets, use cash, shift meaningful equity exposure offshore.

Gundlach’s views on Treasuries and rates

  • Issuance profile: ~80% of Treasuries issued in the past 12 months have maturities <1 year; only ~1.7% were 20–30 year.
  • Historical oddity: despite 13 months of Fed cuts, long-end yields have increased (rare/unprecedented pattern).
  • Fiscal math: official deficit ≈ 6% of GDP today; interest expense ≈ $1.4–$1.5T of a ~$7T budget. Gundlach models scenarios where interest expense could consume a very large share of tax receipts by 2030 (he cites a pessimistic ~60% figure).
  • Policy risk: if long yields rise to a politically intolerable level (Gundlach suggests ~6% could be the tipping point), the government may enact aggressive measures: direct Treasury buys, yield-curve control, mortgage market interventions, or even debt "restructuring" (coupon resets).
  • Tactical stance: avoid long Treasuries; favor short-term Treasuries and cash while watching for an intervention-driven step change lower in long yields.

Private credit: why Gundlach is worried

  • Scale and growth: private credit has grown dramatically since 2015 (previously discussed as “shadow banks” and BDCs).
  • Opacity and marking: many private positions are still marked at par (100) despite clear balance-sheet deterioration in examples (he cites a Renovo Chapter 7 case where liabilities dwarfed assets).
  • Liquidity mismatch: issuance of daily‑NAV or publicly traded vehicles backed by illiquid private loans creates a run risk — promised liquidity vs. asset illiquidity.
  • Leverage layering: funds that buy private credit often use borrowed capital (leverage-on-leverage), amplifying losses when things go wrong.
  • Crisis potential: Gundlach calls private credit the frontrunner for the “next big crisis,” in structural similarity to subprime/CMO problems (though the mechanism differs).
  • Practical implication: don’t allocate to opaque private-credit strategies you can’t stress-test or quickly liquidate; it’s hard to short private credit directly.

Portfolio recommendations (Gundlach’s suggested allocations and rationale)

  • Equities: maximum ~40% overall equity exposure; favor non‑U.S. equities for dollar-based investors (to reduce currency risk and capture regions that have performed better this year).
  • Fixed income: reduce traditional allocation — Gundlach suggests around 20–25% in fixed income (not the classic 40% in a 60/40), favouring short-duration instruments and emerging-market fixed income (EM local currency has been strong for dollar investors).
  • Gold & real assets: add meaningful real-asset exposure — Gundlach historically advocated up to 25% but now suggests around 15% in gold/real assets (still views gold as a core real asset class).
  • Cash/liquidity: hold a meaningful cash position to weather policy shocks and valuation drawdowns.
  • Avoid: long-dated U.S. Treasuries, opaque private-credit funds (especially daily-NAV vehicles backed by illiquid loans), and speculative, momentum-driven equity pockets (AI, data center mania).

Fed, fiscal, and policy scenarios to watch

  • Yield-curve control (YCC): likely candidate if long yields rise to a politically unacceptable level; precedent exists (post-WWII, Japan).
  • Direct Treasury/Treasury-MBS purchases: the Treasury or Fed might buy Treasuries or agency MBS to suppress mortgage rates and reduce fiscal pain.
  • Debt/coupon restructuring: Gundlach raises the possibility of changing coupon terms on existing Treasuries as a blunt fiscal maneuver (controversial and market‑disruptive).
  • Market signals to monitor: widening credit spreads, increases in long Treasury yields toward high-single-digit territory, runs on daily-NAV private-credit vehicles, and any public talk/papers about “restructuring foreign-held Treasuries.”

Market behavior, history, and timing

  • Secular rate regime shift: Gundlach believes the long-term secular decline in rates is over — long rates may rise during the next recession.
  • Mania dynamics: transformative technologies (AI, internet, electricity historically) are often priced extremely early and create speculative manias; Gundlach sees current markets as exhibiting mania characteristics.
  • Timing caveat: being right on direction and wrong on timing is costly; Gundlach advises a multi‑year (he targets 18–24 months) investment horizon for decisions and acknowledges markets can stay irrational much longer than expected.

Notable quotes

  • “The next big crisis in the financial markets is going to be private credit.”
  • “There is only one price for private: 100.” (on persistent par-marking)
  • “By 2030 it’s quite plausible that 60% of all tax receipts go to interest expense.” (pessimistic scenario he presents to show fiscal constraints)

Practical action items for investors (summary)

  • Trim U.S.-centric equity/dollar exposure; consider increasing non‑U.S. equities.
  • Limit long-dated Treasury exposure; prefer short-duration Treasuries if you want government credit.
  • Avoid or be highly selective with private-credit products, especially daily-NAV/public vehicles backed by illiquid loans.
  • Maintain higher cash allocation to navigate policy shocks and possible forced reallocations.
  • Allocate to real assets (gold, high-quality land) — Gundlach favours ~15% in current environment.
  • Monitor market signals that could presage policy intervention: large moves in long yields, runs in liquidity-mismatched funds, and accelerating fiscal stress metrics.
  • Set and communicate an investment horizon of ~18–24 months to clients; manage expectations on short-term underperformance when taking a contrarian stance.

Who should pay attention

  • Portfolio managers and allocators considering private credit or long-duration Treasury positions.
  • Investors relying on traditional 60/40 portfolios for diversification and downside protection.
  • Anyone using daily-NAV vehicles for exposure to illiquid credit.
  • Policy watchers tracking yield-curve control, Treasury-market interventions, or nontraditional fiscal solutions.

This episode is a broad, prescriptive warning: valuations are elevated, private credit is the riskiest corner of today’s market structure, and fiscal/monetary policy may be forced into extraordinary actions that will reprice many “safe” assumptions.