How a Former Fed Vice-Chair Is thinking About the Next Fed Chair

Summary of How a Former Fed Vice-Chair Is thinking About the Next Fed Chair

by Bloomberg

50m•February 6, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of How a Former Fed Vice-Chair Is thinking About the Next Fed Chair

This Odd Lots / Bloomberg episode features hosts Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal interviewing Richard Clarida — former Federal Reserve vice‑chair and now a PIMCO advisor and Columbia professor — about President Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh for Fed chair. The conversation covers (a) Warsh’s intellectual profile and controversies, (b) the institutional mechanics of the Fed (chair power, meetings, communication), (c) forward guidance and balance‑sheet policy, (d) Fed–Treasury relations and a possible “new accord,” and (e) risks to Fed independence and near‑term market implications.

Key topics discussed

  • Kevin Warsh nomination: why it’s politically and intellectually unusual (bipartisan/ideological split among commentators).
  • Warsh’s track record: hawkish critiques of post‑GFC Fed policy, but more recently publicly supportive of rate cuts — raises questions about consistency and motives.
  • Fed–Treasury relationship: practical need for coordination (Treasury market liquidity, bank regulation) vs. risks to independence.
  • Fed chair power and FOMC mechanics: chair has one vote but sets agenda, conducts extensive pre‑meeting outreach and shapes staff briefing content.
  • Forward guidance: its origins at the zero lower bound, benefits and diminishing returns, and potential costs if rolled back (higher interest‑rate volatility).
  • Fed balance sheet: Warsh’s criticism of QE and enlarged balance sheet; technical and political complications of materially shrinking or changing the composition.
  • Models, data and the supply side: Warsh’s skepticism of conventional Phillips‑curve emphasis; Clarida stresses supply‑side/productivity considerations and warns against cherry‑picking historical episodes.
  • AI and near‑term inflation: long‑run disinflationary potential via productivity, but short‑run demand/CapEx could be inflationary.
  • Central bank independence: legal/political threats (subpoena of Powell, pending cases referenced) and how a chair can signal independence.

Main takeaways

  • Clarida judges Warsh a “sensible” pick in some respects, particularly for working with Treasury, but acknowledges open questions about his past crisis judgment and recent tone on rates.
  • The Fed chair’s real institutional power is persuasion and agenda control, not unilateral policymaking — the FOMC structure constrains any chair.
  • Forward guidance and QE are powerful tools that helped stabilize markets at the zero lower bound, but they carry costs and may have diminishing returns; reassessing their role is reasonable.
  • Reducing forward guidance or reversing communication innovations likely raises interest‑rate volatility and would be felt especially in bond markets.
  • Shrinking or materially reorienting the Fed’s balance sheet is technically and politically difficult (reserves, IOER, reluctance to sell MBS) and would probably require negotiated approaches with Treasury.
  • AI complicates the inflation outlook: it may be disinflationary longer term, but investment buildouts could add near‑term demand and upward pressure.
  • Despite political pressures (tweets, subpoenas), Clarida expects the Fed’s institutional independence to persist; however, legal and political contests could test it.

Notable quotes & succinct insights

  • “The power of the Fed chair is the power of persuasion” — Clarida on the chair’s real influence.
  • “Forward guidance and quantitative easing are not exempt from the laws of economics” — costs and diminishing returns exist.
  • On QE and IOER: buying Treasuries today “isn’t really printing money… it’s changing the maturity composition of government debt from fixed to floating.”
  • Clarida: forward guidance became central because, at ZLB, markets priced in hikes the Fed didn’t intend — guidance was needed to reassure markets.

Market and policy implications — what to watch

  • Committee composition and voting rotation: who is a current voter matters (several hawkish/dovish governors and Reserve Bank presidents rotate).
  • Fed communications: look for changes to press conferences, dot‑plots, and public guidance; less guidance → more implied/realized rate volatility (MOVE index, futures).
  • Balance‑sheet signals: any talk of selling MBS or changing composition vs. using Treasury coordination will be slow and technical — watch Fed minutes, transcripts and Treasury exchanges.
  • Legal/political developments: subpoenas and court cases touching Fed independence (referenced in the discussion) are material for institutional risk.
  • Macro data and AI investment cycles: monitor capex trends, labor market tightness and break‑even inflation measures to gauge near‑term inflation vs longer‑term productivity gains.

Practical summary for listeners (3–4 action items)

  • Follow FOMC communications (dot plots, minutes, pressers) for early signals of any rollback of forward guidance.
  • Track bond‑market volatility indices (MOVE, futures-implied vols) that would respond quickly if communication changes occur.
  • Watch Treasury–Fed public interactions (speeches, op-eds, meetings) for signs of a formal or informal “accord” about balance‑sheet composition.
  • Monitor capex and AI‑related investment flows as a potential source of near‑term demand pressure distinct from long‑term productivity effects.

Final note

Clarida blends institutional history, technical mechanics and wonky detail to argue that many of the changes to Fed practice since 2008 were purposeful responses to the crisis. Reassessing some of those innovations under a new chair (like Warsh) is reasonable — but any substantive changes (balance sheet, communication strategy) will be complex, politically visible, and likely gradual.