Overview of Masters in Business — "Maximizing Luck" (Judd Kessler)
This episode features Judd Kessler (Howard Marks Professor, Wharton) discussing his book Lucky by Design: The Hidden Economics You Need to Get More of What You Want. The central idea: many outcomes we call “luck” are actually determined by underlying allocation rules — hidden markets — and learning those rules (or improving them) changes who wins, who loses, and how fairly resources are distributed. Kessler blends experimental economics and market design to explain everyday examples (restaurant reservations, concert tickets, school slots, organ transplants, college admissions) and gives practical strategies for individuals and policy fixes for designers.
Key themes & main takeaways
- Hidden markets: Scarce resources are often allocated by rules other than price (lotteries, queues, matching algorithms, waitlists, verification systems). Recognize these as markets you can study and influence.
- Three E’s of market design:
- Equity — fairness in who gets access.
- Efficiency — are resources put to their best use, minimizing waste?
- Ease — how simple is participation? (Often overlooked by standard economics.)
- Game-theory perspective: Success requires understanding other participants’ incentives and the allocation rule, then choosing a strategy (settle for silver vs. go for gold).
- Designers matter: Rules create winners, losers, and external actors (brokers, bots). Good design can reduce waste and improve fairness without relying only on price signals.
- You are a market designer too: your time, calendar and attention are scarce resources you allocate — consider design choices there.
Notable examples & case studies
Everyday allocation games
- After-school class registration: often a first-come, first-served race; strategy includes avoiding the most-contested slots (settle for silver) or coordinating entries.
- Restaurant reservations (French Laundry example): choose less-contested time zones (4:30 vs. 7:30) or act as if your secondary choice is primary.
- Last-minute theater/broadway tickets: buying near showtime can drastically reduce price (exploiting expiry).
Live events & tickets
- Taylor Swift / Eras tour: intentionally low base prices ($49 cheapest; ~$200 average) create massive excess demand. Artists may price low for equity, fan access, brand, or PR, not revenue maximization.
- Problems: bots, brokers and secondary platforms extract huge fees (Ticketmaster secondary fees ~30%), undermining artist intent.
- Design fixes: verified-fan lotteries, named tickets/ID verification, capped resales or structured resale markets (smart contracts or artist revenue share) and moving from first-come races to lotteries/random allocation that reward flexibility.
Public policy & allocations
- Vietnam draft: pre-lottery system favored politically connected, wealthier, whiter men (deferments, boards). The birth-date lottery made selection more random and increased anti-war pressure when elites were also at risk.
- Organ transplantation:
- ~100,000 Americans on the transplant waiting list; ~90% await a kidney (dialysis prolongs waiting).
- Waste: about 20% of donated kidneys are discarded under current response/offer systems.
- Policy example: Israel’s system links donor registration to priority (sign up to be a donor → higher allocation priority later). Increases in registrations were substantial around the policy rollout. U.S. allocation is national (would require federal change).
- Opt-out systems show limited advantage because next-of-kin consent still influences recovery; incentive-based priority systems perform better in some contexts.
Housing & rent
- Affordable housing lotteries in major cities: extreme oversubscription (e.g., ~6 million applicants for ~10 units in a year in NYC examples), creating inefficient entry behavior and “golden handcuffs” for winners.
- Price caps or rent freezes: can help incumbents but often do not address underlying supply constraints; may create hidden markets and misallocation.
Water allocation
- Colorado River example: first-in-time, first-in-right (priority for early claimants) can entrench antiquated allocations that are neither efficient nor equitable—analogous to how recurring calendar meetings lock time in inefficiently.
Practical strategies listeners can use (actionable)
- Identify the market rule: Is it first-come, lottery, waitlist, matching, two-sided “choose-me” market (e.g., college admissions), or resale-enabled?
- Tailor strategy:
- First-come races: be available at start, or intentionally pick less-contested options (silver).
- Lotteries: increase the number of entries legitimately (friends/family entering), coordinate multiple entries, reveal flexibility in preferences.
- Choose-me markets (college, jobs): research both sides — what institutions value (yield, fit, demonstrable interest) — and position accordingly (early decision if likely to convert).
- Reduce broker/bot exposure: use verified-registration processes where available; prefer platforms with name/ID verification or controlled resale policies.
- Be a market designer for personal time: reassess recurring commitments and treat your schedule as a scarce resource — consider consolidation of tasks or redesigning recurring meetings for efficiency.
- Advocate/push for policy/design improvements: for public goods (organ donation priority programs, better ticket allocation), support reforms that increase supply, limit intermediary rent extraction, or redesign allocation rules to balance the three E’s.
Data & striking numbers from the conversation
- Organ transplant: ~100,000 on U.S. waiting list; ~90% waiting for kidneys. ~20% of donated kidneys discarded.
- Ticket/secondary fees: example cited ~30% transaction fees on resale platforms.
- Housing lotteries: millions of applicants for a handful of affordable units (example ~6M applicants for ~10 units — ~1 in 600 chance).
- Vietnam draft (pre-lottery): African-Americans constituted ~11% of population but ~22% of draftees and casualties.
About the guest & background
- Judd Kessler — Howard Marks Professor, Wharton School (UPenn); experimental economist and market designer. Education: Harvard (BA, MA, PhD), MPhil in economics at Cambridge, plus a master’s in philosophy from Cambridge noted earlier.
- Mentors: Alvin Roth (major influence), work spans organ allocation, course allocation, youth employment, experimental studies.
- Honors: Vernon L. Smith Prize (2021) for experimental economics contributions.
Recommended reading & resources
- Lucky by Design — Judd Kessler (podcast’s focal book).
- Who Gets What and Why — Alvin E. Roth (recommended companion on market design).
- Corinne Low (Having It All) — related reading on household production norms and gendered division of labor.
Memorable quotes & framing (paraphrased)
- “Hidden markets are everywhere — scarce resources allocated without prices doing all the work.”
- The Three E’s: “Equity, Efficiency, Ease — design should balance these.”
- “You are a market designer — your time and attention are scarce resources you allocate.”
Final practical takeaway
Look for the rule behind the outcome. Once you identify whether the allocation is a race, lottery, queue, or matching market, you can choose better tactics (or push for better design) to turn apparent luck into predictable advantage or fairer outcomes for many.
