The demise of David Jones

Summary of The demise of David Jones

by ABC Australia

14m•November 5, 2026
Listen to Episode

Overview of The demise of David Jones

This episode of ABC News Daily examines the collapse of David Jones, one of Australia’s most iconic department stores, after 188 years in business. Journalist Sam Hawley speaks with creative director Dee Madigan about how the brand went from a cultural institution and luxury shopping destination to a company in voluntary administration, with thousands of jobs and stores now at risk.

What Happened

  • David Jones has been placed into voluntary administration after years of financial decline.
  • The company reported a loss of more than $95 million last year.
  • It has reportedly not paid rent to Westfield since September across 17 stores.
  • Around 38 stores and about 6,000 staff are affected.
  • The administration is meant to give the business time to restructure, but it also signals serious financial distress.

Why David Jones Fell

Loss of brand power

Dee Madigan argues the biggest problem was not just online shopping, but the erosion of David Jones’ premium identity.

  • After being sold in 2014 to a South African owner, the business was run more like a balance sheet than a brand.
  • Heavy discounting taught shoppers to wait for sales, which damaged margins and prestige.
  • The company lost the sense of exclusivity that once made shopping there feel special.

Decline in customer experience

  • David Jones once offered a highly curated, luxurious in-store experience.
  • Over time, it became more ordinary and less personalised.
  • Reduced service, fewer distinctive features, and less emotional appeal made it harder to justify shopping there over competitors or online.

Strategic missteps

  • The business focused on short-term profit rather than long-term brand health.
  • Madigan says executive incentives often reward immediate financial gains, even if they damage the company’s future value.

Why David Jones Mattered

David Jones was more than a store; it was part of Australian cultural life.

  • Founded in 1838 as a corner shop.
  • The flagship Elizabeth Street, Sydney store opened in 1927.
  • It hosted major public and cultural moments, including:
    • the Queen’s visit in 1954
    • people watching the moon landing in 1969
    • the first showing of Christian Dior’s collection outside Paris in 1948
  • It was seen as a place where Australians encountered fashion, taste, and Christmas traditions.

What Happens Next

Madigan outlines three possible paths:

  1. Sale and restructure

    • The most likely outcome.
    • David Jones could survive in a smaller form, with fewer stores.

  2. Some kind of turnaround

    • Less likely, because the problems appear structural rather than temporary.

  3. Liquidation

    • If no buyer emerges, the company could be wound down.

She expects a buyer may want the brand name, but any rescue would likely require:

  • closing many stores
  • keeping flagship locations only
  • significant new investment

Wider Retail Lessons

The episode places David Jones in a broader retail context:

  • Other department stores overseas, like Macy’s and John Lewis, are also under pressure.
  • Yet some physical retailers still thrive when they become destinations, such as Harrods and Selfridges.
  • In Australia, brands like Mecca and Princess Polly show that physical stores can still work if the experience is strong.
  • The key difference is that successful stores give customers something online shopping cannot: service, atmosphere, and immediacy.

Consumer and Creditor Implications

The episode also highlights practical consequences for customers and suppliers:

  • People with gift cards are effectively unsecured creditors, so they should use them quickly.
  • Customers waiting on refunds or holding lay-bys are urged to act fast.
  • Staff wages and entitlements are expected to rank ahead of many creditors.
  • Suppliers and landlords are likely to take losses if the company restructures or closes stores.

Key Takeaways

  • David Jones’ collapse is not just about online shopping; it is about brand damage and poor strategic decisions.
  • The company lost the premium identity that once made it unique.
  • Its future likely depends on a sale, major downsizing, or liquidation.
  • The story serves as a warning that retail brands can survive only if they protect both experience and value.